DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
To: "Thomas Monjalon" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	"Tyler Retzlaff" <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] eal: provide rte attribute macro for GCC attribute
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2024 13:53:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35E9F22A@smartserver.smartshare.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3556729.8hb0ThOEGa@thomas>

> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net]
> Sent: Sunday, 18 February 2024 13.24
> 
> 15/02/2024 23:20, Tyler Retzlaff:
> > Provide a new macro __rte_attribute(a) that when directly used
> > compiles to empty for MSVC and to __attribute__(a) when using
> GCC/LLVM.
> >
> > Replace direct use of __attribute__ in __rte_xxx macros where there
> is
> > existing empty expansion of the macro for MSVC allowing removal of
> > repeated #ifdef RTE_TOOLCHAIN_MSVC per macro to expand empty.
> 
> I'm not sure it makes sense.
> I prefer seeing clearly what is empty with MSVC.

This topic has previously been discussed in another context - adding external libraries [1].

Like you do here, I generally preferred #ifdefs in the code, but the majority preferred stubs "promoting improved code readability".

I might argue that Tyler is following that guidance here; and perhaps the decision should be reconsidered, now that we have a real-life example of how it affects code readability. ;-)

[1]: https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/20240109141009.497807-1-jerinj@marvell.com/


  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-18 12:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-15 22:20 [PATCH] remove some MSVC conditional compile to empty Tyler Retzlaff
2024-02-15 22:20 ` [PATCH] eal: provide rte attribute macro for GCC attribute Tyler Retzlaff
2024-02-18 12:24   ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-02-18 12:53     ` Morten Brørup [this message]
2024-02-18 15:34       ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-02-18 16:38         ` Morten Brørup
2024-02-18 16:44           ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-02-20 17:50             ` Tyler Retzlaff
2024-02-18 14:51     ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-02-18 15:31       ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-02-20 18:06         ` Tyler Retzlaff
2024-02-20 18:27           ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-02-27 22:45 ` [PATCH] remove some MSVC conditional compile to empty Tyler Retzlaff

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35E9F22A@smartserver.smartshare.dk \
    --to=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).