From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B05AA43B61; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 11:38:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71B50402D1; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 11:38:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from dkmailrelay1.smartsharesystems.com (smartserver.smartsharesystems.com [77.243.40.215]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09398402CE for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 11:38:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from smartserver.smartsharesystems.com (smartserver.smartsharesys.local [192.168.4.10]) by dkmailrelay1.smartsharesystems.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC37B20B47; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 11:38:35 +0100 (CET) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: [PATCH v5] mempool: test performance with larger bursts X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 11:38:34 +0100 Message-ID: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35E9F23D@smartserver.smartshare.dk> In-Reply-To: <3407155.BzM5BlMlMQ@thomas> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [PATCH v5] mempool: test performance with larger bursts Thread-Index: Adpkr+j7Jp9b1dr+Tz6qX7n5bZJCjgAAUlpA References: <20240121045249.22465-1-mb@smartsharesystems.com> <3522622.fIoEIV5pvu@thomas> <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35E9F237@smartserver.smartshare.dk> <3407155.BzM5BlMlMQ@thomas> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Morten_Br=F8rup?= To: "Thomas Monjalon" Cc: , , X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net] > Sent: Wednesday, 21 February 2024 11.23 >=20 > 20/02/2024 14:49, Morten Br=F8rup: > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net] > > > > > > How the test duration is changed after this patch? > > > > On my test machine, the expanded test parameter set increased the > duration of one test run from 20 minutes to 100 minutes. > > Before the patch, all three test runs were always executed, i.e. a > total duration of 60 minutes. > > > > In other words: > > The expanded test parameter set increased the test run duration by > factor five. > > Introducing the ability to optionally only test with a specific > number of lcores reduced the total test duration to a third. >=20 > That's a very long test. > It would be interesting to find a way to make it shorter. I tried looking into this, but I couldn't figure out how to pass = parameters to a test, so I added the three variants with shorter tests, = as suggested by Chengwen Feng.