From: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
To: <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>, <thomas@monjalon.net>,
<andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v7] mempool: test performance with larger bursts
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 10:56:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35E9F50B@smartserver.smartshare.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35E9F359@smartserver.smartshare.dk>
PING (again) for review.
Many applications use bursts of more than 32 packets,
and some applications buffer more than 512 packets.
This patch updates the mempool perf test accordingly.
-Morten
> From: Morten Brørup [mailto:mb@smartsharesystems.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 4 April 2024 11.27
>
> PING for review. This patch is relatively trivial.
>
> > From: Morten Brørup [mailto:mb@smartsharesystems.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, 2 March 2024 21.04
> >
> > Bursts of up to 64, 128 and 256 packets are not uncommon, so increase the
> > maximum tested get and put burst sizes from 32 to 256.
> > For convenience, also test get and put burst sizes of
> > RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_MAX_SIZE.
> >
> > Some applications keep more than 512 objects, so increase the maximum
> > number of kept objects from 512 to 32768, still in jumps of factor four.
> > This exceeds the typical mempool cache size of 512 objects, so the test
> > also exercises the mempool driver.
> >
> > Increased the precision of rate_persec calculation by timing the actual
> > duration of the test, instead of assuming it took exactly 5 seconds.
> >
> > Added cache guard to per-lcore stats structure.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
> > Acked-by: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
> > ---
> >
> > v7:
> > * Increase max burst size to 256. (Inspired by Honnappa)
> > v6:
> > * Do not test with more lcores than available. (Thomas)
> > v5:
> > * Increased N, to reduce measurement overhead with large numbers of kept
> > objects.
> > * Increased precision of rate_persec calculation.
> > * Added missing cache guard to per-lcore stats structure.
> > v4:
> > * v3 failed to apply; I had messed up something with git.
> > * Added ACK from Chengwen Feng.
> > v3:
> > * Increased max number of kept objects to 32768.
> > * Added get and put burst sizes of RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_MAX_SIZE objects.
> > * Print error if unable to allocate mempool.
> > * Initialize use_external_cache with each test.
> > A previous version of this patch had a bug, where all test runs
> > following the first would use external cache. (Chengwen Feng)
> > v2: Addressed feedback by Chengwen Feng
> > * Added get and put burst sizes of 64 objects, which is probably also not
> > uncommon packet burst size.
> > * Fixed list of number of kept objects so list remains in jumps of factor
> > four.
> > * Added three derivative test cases, for faster testing.
> > ---
> > app/test/test_mempool_perf.c | 144 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> > 1 file changed, 96 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test/test_mempool_perf.c b/app/test/test_mempool_perf.c
> > index 96de347f04..bb40d1d911 100644
> > --- a/app/test/test_mempool_perf.c
> > +++ b/app/test/test_mempool_perf.c
> > @@ -54,22 +54,25 @@
> > *
> > * - Bulk size (*n_get_bulk*, *n_put_bulk*)
> > *
> > - * - Bulk get from 1 to 32
> > - * - Bulk put from 1 to 32
> > - * - Bulk get and put from 1 to 32, compile time constant
> > + * - Bulk get from 1 to 256, and RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_MAX_SIZE
> > + * - Bulk put from 1 to 256, and RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_MAX_SIZE
> > + * - Bulk get and put from 1 to 256, and RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_MAX_SIZE,
> > compile time constant
> > *
> > * - Number of kept objects (*n_keep*)
> > *
> > * - 32
> > * - 128
> > * - 512
> > + * - 2048
> > + * - 8192
> > + * - 32768
> > */
> >
> > -#define N 65536
> > #define TIME_S 5
> > #define MEMPOOL_ELT_SIZE 2048
> > -#define MAX_KEEP 512
> > -#define MEMPOOL_SIZE
> > ((rte_lcore_count()*(MAX_KEEP+RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_MAX_SIZE))-1)
> > +#define MAX_KEEP 32768
> > +#define N (128 * MAX_KEEP)
> > +#define MEMPOOL_SIZE
> > ((rte_lcore_count()*(MAX_KEEP+RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_MAX_SIZE*2))-1)
> >
> > /* Number of pointers fitting into one cache line. */
> > #define CACHE_LINE_BURST (RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE / sizeof(uintptr_t))
> > @@ -100,9 +103,11 @@ static unsigned n_keep;
> > /* true if we want to test with constant n_get_bulk and n_put_bulk */
> > static int use_constant_values;
> >
> > -/* number of enqueues / dequeues */
> > +/* number of enqueues / dequeues, and time used */
> > struct mempool_test_stats {
> > uint64_t enq_count;
> > + uint64_t duration_cycles;
> > + RTE_CACHE_GUARD;
> > } __rte_cache_aligned;
> >
> > static struct mempool_test_stats stats[RTE_MAX_LCORE];
> > @@ -185,6 +190,7 @@ per_lcore_mempool_test(void *arg)
> > GOTO_ERR(ret, out);
> >
> > stats[lcore_id].enq_count = 0;
> > + stats[lcore_id].duration_cycles = 0;
> >
> > /* wait synchro for workers */
> > if (lcore_id != rte_get_main_lcore())
> > @@ -204,6 +210,15 @@ per_lcore_mempool_test(void *arg)
> > CACHE_LINE_BURST, CACHE_LINE_BURST);
> > else if (n_get_bulk == 32)
> > ret = test_loop(mp, cache, n_keep, 32, 32);
> > + else if (n_get_bulk == 64)
> > + ret = test_loop(mp, cache, n_keep, 64, 64);
> > + else if (n_get_bulk == 128)
> > + ret = test_loop(mp, cache, n_keep, 128, 128);
> > + else if (n_get_bulk == 256)
> > + ret = test_loop(mp, cache, n_keep, 256, 256);
> > + else if (n_get_bulk == RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_MAX_SIZE)
> > + ret = test_loop(mp, cache, n_keep,
> > + RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_MAX_SIZE,
> > RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_MAX_SIZE);
> > else
> > ret = -1;
> >
> > @@ -215,6 +230,8 @@ per_lcore_mempool_test(void *arg)
> > stats[lcore_id].enq_count += N;
> > }
> >
> > + stats[lcore_id].duration_cycles = time_diff;
> > +
> > out:
> > if (use_external_cache) {
> > rte_mempool_cache_flush(cache, mp);
> > @@ -232,6 +249,7 @@ launch_cores(struct rte_mempool *mp, unsigned int cores)
> > uint64_t rate;
> > int ret;
> > unsigned cores_save = cores;
> > + double hz = rte_get_timer_hz();
> >
> > __atomic_store_n(&synchro, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
> >
> > @@ -278,7 +296,9 @@ launch_cores(struct rte_mempool *mp, unsigned int cores)
> >
> > rate = 0;
> > for (lcore_id = 0; lcore_id < RTE_MAX_LCORE; lcore_id++)
> > - rate += (stats[lcore_id].enq_count / TIME_S);
> > + if (stats[lcore_id].duration_cycles != 0)
> > + rate += (double)stats[lcore_id].enq_count * hz /
> > + (double)stats[lcore_id].duration_cycles;
> >
> > printf("rate_persec=%" PRIu64 "\n", rate);
> >
> > @@ -287,11 +307,13 @@ launch_cores(struct rte_mempool *mp, unsigned int
> cores)
> >
> > /* for a given number of core, launch all test cases */
> > static int
> > -do_one_mempool_test(struct rte_mempool *mp, unsigned int cores)
> > +do_one_mempool_test(struct rte_mempool *mp, unsigned int cores, int
> > external_cache)
> > {
> > - unsigned int bulk_tab_get[] = { 1, 4, CACHE_LINE_BURST, 32, 0 };
> > - unsigned int bulk_tab_put[] = { 1, 4, CACHE_LINE_BURST, 32, 0 };
> > - unsigned int keep_tab[] = { 32, 128, 512, 0 };
> > + unsigned int bulk_tab_get[] = { 1, 4, CACHE_LINE_BURST, 32, 64, 128,
> > 256,
> > + RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_MAX_SIZE, 0 };
> > + unsigned int bulk_tab_put[] = { 1, 4, CACHE_LINE_BURST, 32, 64, 128,
> > 256,
> > + RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_MAX_SIZE, 0 };
> > + unsigned int keep_tab[] = { 32, 128, 512, 2048, 8192, 32768, 0 };
> > unsigned *get_bulk_ptr;
> > unsigned *put_bulk_ptr;
> > unsigned *keep_ptr;
> > @@ -301,6 +323,10 @@ do_one_mempool_test(struct rte_mempool *mp, unsigned
> int
> > cores)
> > for (put_bulk_ptr = bulk_tab_put; *put_bulk_ptr; put_bulk_ptr++)
> > {
> > for (keep_ptr = keep_tab; *keep_ptr; keep_ptr++) {
> >
> > + if (*keep_ptr < *get_bulk_ptr || *keep_ptr <
> > *put_bulk_ptr)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + use_external_cache = external_cache;
> > use_constant_values = 0;
> > n_get_bulk = *get_bulk_ptr;
> > n_put_bulk = *put_bulk_ptr;
> > @@ -323,7 +349,7 @@ do_one_mempool_test(struct rte_mempool *mp, unsigned int
> > cores)
> > }
> >
> > static int
> > -test_mempool_perf(void)
> > +do_all_mempool_perf_tests(unsigned int cores)
> > {
> > struct rte_mempool *mp_cache = NULL;
> > struct rte_mempool *mp_nocache = NULL;
> > @@ -337,8 +363,10 @@ test_mempool_perf(void)
> > NULL, NULL,
> > my_obj_init, NULL,
> > SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
> > - if (mp_nocache == NULL)
> > + if (mp_nocache == NULL) {
> > + printf("cannot allocate mempool (without cache)\n");
> > goto err;
> > + }
> >
> > /* create a mempool (with cache) */
> > mp_cache = rte_mempool_create("perf_test_cache", MEMPOOL_SIZE,
> > @@ -347,8 +375,10 @@ test_mempool_perf(void)
> > NULL, NULL,
> > my_obj_init, NULL,
> > SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
> > - if (mp_cache == NULL)
> > + if (mp_cache == NULL) {
> > + printf("cannot allocate mempool (with cache)\n");
> > goto err;
> > + }
> >
> > default_pool_ops = rte_mbuf_best_mempool_ops();
> > /* Create a mempool based on Default handler */
> > @@ -376,65 +406,83 @@ test_mempool_perf(void)
> >
> > rte_mempool_obj_iter(default_pool, my_obj_init, NULL);
> >
> > - /* performance test with 1, 2 and max cores */
> > printf("start performance test (without cache)\n");
> > -
> > - if (do_one_mempool_test(mp_nocache, 1) < 0)
> > - goto err;
> > -
> > - if (do_one_mempool_test(mp_nocache, 2) < 0)
> > + if (do_one_mempool_test(mp_nocache, cores, 0) < 0)
> > goto err;
> >
> > - if (do_one_mempool_test(mp_nocache, rte_lcore_count()) < 0)
> > - goto err;
> > -
> > - /* performance test with 1, 2 and max cores */
> > printf("start performance test for %s (without cache)\n",
> > default_pool_ops);
> > -
> > - if (do_one_mempool_test(default_pool, 1) < 0)
> > + if (do_one_mempool_test(default_pool, cores, 0) < 0)
> > goto err;
> >
> > - if (do_one_mempool_test(default_pool, 2) < 0)
> > + printf("start performance test (with cache)\n");
> > + if (do_one_mempool_test(mp_cache, cores, 0) < 0)
> > goto err;
> >
> > - if (do_one_mempool_test(default_pool, rte_lcore_count()) < 0)
> > + printf("start performance test (with user-owned cache)\n");
> > + if (do_one_mempool_test(mp_nocache, cores, 1) < 0)
> > goto err;
> >
> > - /* performance test with 1, 2 and max cores */
> > - printf("start performance test (with cache)\n");
> > + rte_mempool_list_dump(stdout);
> >
> > - if (do_one_mempool_test(mp_cache, 1) < 0)
> > - goto err;
> > + ret = 0;
> >
> > - if (do_one_mempool_test(mp_cache, 2) < 0)
> > - goto err;
> > +err:
> > + rte_mempool_free(mp_cache);
> > + rte_mempool_free(mp_nocache);
> > + rte_mempool_free(default_pool);
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> >
> > - if (do_one_mempool_test(mp_cache, rte_lcore_count()) < 0)
> > - goto err;
> > +static int
> > +test_mempool_perf_1core(void)
> > +{
> > + return do_all_mempool_perf_tests(1);
> > +}
> >
> > - /* performance test with 1, 2 and max cores */
> > - printf("start performance test (with user-owned cache)\n");
> > - use_external_cache = 1;
> > +static int
> > +test_mempool_perf_2cores(void)
> > +{
> > + if (rte_lcore_count() < 2) {
> > + printf("not enough lcores\n");
> > + return -1;
> > + }
> > + return do_all_mempool_perf_tests(2);
> > +}
> >
> > - if (do_one_mempool_test(mp_nocache, 1) < 0)
> > - goto err;
> > +static int
> > +test_mempool_perf_allcores(void)
> > +{
> > + return do_all_mempool_perf_tests(rte_lcore_count());
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int
> > +test_mempool_perf(void)
> > +{
> > + int ret = -1;
> >
> > - if (do_one_mempool_test(mp_nocache, 2) < 0)
> > + /* performance test with 1, 2 and max cores */
> > + if (do_all_mempool_perf_tests(1) < 0)
> > goto err;
> > + if (rte_lcore_count() == 1)
> > + goto done;
> >
> > - if (do_one_mempool_test(mp_nocache, rte_lcore_count()) < 0)
> > + if (do_all_mempool_perf_tests(2) < 0)
> > goto err;
> > + if (rte_lcore_count() == 2)
> > + goto done;
> >
> > - rte_mempool_list_dump(stdout);
> > + if (do_all_mempool_perf_tests(rte_lcore_count()) < 0)
> > + goto err;
> >
> > +done:
> > ret = 0;
> >
> > err:
> > - rte_mempool_free(mp_cache);
> > - rte_mempool_free(mp_nocache);
> > - rte_mempool_free(default_pool);
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > REGISTER_PERF_TEST(mempool_perf_autotest, test_mempool_perf);
> > +REGISTER_PERF_TEST(mempool_perf_autotest_1core, test_mempool_perf_1core);
> > +REGISTER_PERF_TEST(mempool_perf_autotest_2cores, test_mempool_perf_2cores);
> > +REGISTER_PERF_TEST(mempool_perf_autotest_allcores,
> > test_mempool_perf_allcores);
> > --
> > 2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-10 8:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-21 4:52 [PATCH] " Morten Brørup
2024-01-22 7:10 ` fengchengwen
2024-01-22 14:34 ` [PATCH v2] " Morten Brørup
2024-01-24 2:41 ` fengchengwen
2024-01-24 8:58 ` [PATCH v3] " Morten Brørup
2024-01-24 9:10 ` [PATCH v4] " Morten Brørup
2024-01-24 11:21 ` [PATCH v5] " Morten Brørup
2024-02-18 18:03 ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-02-20 13:49 ` Morten Brørup
2024-02-21 10:22 ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-02-21 10:38 ` Morten Brørup
2024-02-21 10:40 ` Bruce Richardson
2024-02-20 14:01 ` [PATCH v6] " Morten Brørup
2024-03-02 20:04 ` [PATCH v7] " Morten Brørup
2024-04-04 9:26 ` Morten Brørup
2024-06-10 8:56 ` Morten Brørup [this message]
2024-06-18 13:21 ` Bruce Richardson
2024-06-18 13:48 ` Morten Brørup
2024-09-13 14:58 ` Morten Brørup
2024-09-16 12:40 ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-09-16 13:08 ` Morten Brørup
2024-09-16 14:04 ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-09-16 15:37 ` [PATCH v8] " Morten Brørup
2024-09-17 8:10 ` [PATCH v9] " Morten Brørup
2024-10-08 9:14 ` Morten Brørup
2024-10-11 12:50 ` David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35E9F50B@smartserver.smartshare.dk \
--to=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=fengchengwen@huawei.com \
--cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).