DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
To: <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>, <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	<andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v7] mempool: test performance with larger bursts
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 10:56:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35E9F50B@smartserver.smartshare.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35E9F359@smartserver.smartshare.dk>

PING (again) for review.

Many applications use bursts of more than 32 packets,
and some applications buffer more than 512 packets.

This patch updates the mempool perf test accordingly.

-Morten

> From: Morten Brørup [mailto:mb@smartsharesystems.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 4 April 2024 11.27
> 
> PING for review. This patch is relatively trivial.
> 
> > From: Morten Brørup [mailto:mb@smartsharesystems.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, 2 March 2024 21.04
> >
> > Bursts of up to 64, 128 and 256 packets are not uncommon, so increase the
> > maximum tested get and put burst sizes from 32 to 256.
> > For convenience, also test get and put burst sizes of
> > RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_MAX_SIZE.
> >
> > Some applications keep more than 512 objects, so increase the maximum
> > number of kept objects from 512 to 32768, still in jumps of factor four.
> > This exceeds the typical mempool cache size of 512 objects, so the test
> > also exercises the mempool driver.
> >
> > Increased the precision of rate_persec calculation by timing the actual
> > duration of the test, instead of assuming it took exactly 5 seconds.
> >
> > Added cache guard to per-lcore stats structure.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
> > Acked-by: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
> > ---
> >
> > v7:
> > * Increase max burst size to 256. (Inspired by Honnappa)
> > v6:
> > * Do not test with more lcores than available. (Thomas)
> > v5:
> > * Increased N, to reduce measurement overhead with large numbers of kept
> >   objects.
> > * Increased precision of rate_persec calculation.
> > * Added missing cache guard to per-lcore stats structure.
> > v4:
> > * v3 failed to apply; I had messed up something with git.
> > * Added ACK from Chengwen Feng.
> > v3:
> > * Increased max number of kept objects to 32768.
> > * Added get and put burst sizes of RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_MAX_SIZE objects.
> > * Print error if unable to allocate mempool.
> > * Initialize use_external_cache with each test.
> >   A previous version of this patch had a bug, where all test runs
> >   following the first would use external cache. (Chengwen Feng)
> > v2: Addressed feedback by Chengwen Feng
> > * Added get and put burst sizes of 64 objects, which is probably also not
> >   uncommon packet burst size.
> > * Fixed list of number of kept objects so list remains in jumps of factor
> >   four.
> > * Added three derivative test cases, for faster testing.
> > ---
> >  app/test/test_mempool_perf.c | 144 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> >  1 file changed, 96 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test/test_mempool_perf.c b/app/test/test_mempool_perf.c
> > index 96de347f04..bb40d1d911 100644
> > --- a/app/test/test_mempool_perf.c
> > +++ b/app/test/test_mempool_perf.c
> > @@ -54,22 +54,25 @@
> >   *
> >   *    - Bulk size (*n_get_bulk*, *n_put_bulk*)
> >   *
> > - *      - Bulk get from 1 to 32
> > - *      - Bulk put from 1 to 32
> > - *      - Bulk get and put from 1 to 32, compile time constant
> > + *      - Bulk get from 1 to 256, and RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_MAX_SIZE
> > + *      - Bulk put from 1 to 256, and RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_MAX_SIZE
> > + *      - Bulk get and put from 1 to 256, and RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_MAX_SIZE,
> > compile time constant
> >   *
> >   *    - Number of kept objects (*n_keep*)
> >   *
> >   *      - 32
> >   *      - 128
> >   *      - 512
> > + *      - 2048
> > + *      - 8192
> > + *      - 32768
> >   */
> >
> > -#define N 65536
> >  #define TIME_S 5
> >  #define MEMPOOL_ELT_SIZE 2048
> > -#define MAX_KEEP 512
> > -#define MEMPOOL_SIZE
> > ((rte_lcore_count()*(MAX_KEEP+RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_MAX_SIZE))-1)
> > +#define MAX_KEEP 32768
> > +#define N (128 * MAX_KEEP)
> > +#define MEMPOOL_SIZE
> > ((rte_lcore_count()*(MAX_KEEP+RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_MAX_SIZE*2))-1)
> >
> >  /* Number of pointers fitting into one cache line. */
> >  #define CACHE_LINE_BURST (RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE / sizeof(uintptr_t))
> > @@ -100,9 +103,11 @@ static unsigned n_keep;
> >  /* true if we want to test with constant n_get_bulk and n_put_bulk */
> >  static int use_constant_values;
> >
> > -/* number of enqueues / dequeues */
> > +/* number of enqueues / dequeues, and time used */
> >  struct mempool_test_stats {
> >  	uint64_t enq_count;
> > +	uint64_t duration_cycles;
> > +	RTE_CACHE_GUARD;
> >  } __rte_cache_aligned;
> >
> >  static struct mempool_test_stats stats[RTE_MAX_LCORE];
> > @@ -185,6 +190,7 @@ per_lcore_mempool_test(void *arg)
> >  		GOTO_ERR(ret, out);
> >
> >  	stats[lcore_id].enq_count = 0;
> > +	stats[lcore_id].duration_cycles = 0;
> >
> >  	/* wait synchro for workers */
> >  	if (lcore_id != rte_get_main_lcore())
> > @@ -204,6 +210,15 @@ per_lcore_mempool_test(void *arg)
> >  					CACHE_LINE_BURST, CACHE_LINE_BURST);
> >  		else if (n_get_bulk == 32)
> >  			ret = test_loop(mp, cache, n_keep, 32, 32);
> > +		else if (n_get_bulk == 64)
> > +			ret = test_loop(mp, cache, n_keep, 64, 64);
> > +		else if (n_get_bulk == 128)
> > +			ret = test_loop(mp, cache, n_keep, 128, 128);
> > +		else if (n_get_bulk == 256)
> > +			ret = test_loop(mp, cache, n_keep, 256, 256);
> > +		else if (n_get_bulk == RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_MAX_SIZE)
> > +			ret = test_loop(mp, cache, n_keep,
> > +					RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_MAX_SIZE,
> > RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_MAX_SIZE);
> >  		else
> >  			ret = -1;
> >
> > @@ -215,6 +230,8 @@ per_lcore_mempool_test(void *arg)
> >  		stats[lcore_id].enq_count += N;
> >  	}
> >
> > +	stats[lcore_id].duration_cycles = time_diff;
> > +
> >  out:
> >  	if (use_external_cache) {
> >  		rte_mempool_cache_flush(cache, mp);
> > @@ -232,6 +249,7 @@ launch_cores(struct rte_mempool *mp, unsigned int cores)
> >  	uint64_t rate;
> >  	int ret;
> >  	unsigned cores_save = cores;
> > +	double hz = rte_get_timer_hz();
> >
> >  	__atomic_store_n(&synchro, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
> >
> > @@ -278,7 +296,9 @@ launch_cores(struct rte_mempool *mp, unsigned int cores)
> >
> >  	rate = 0;
> >  	for (lcore_id = 0; lcore_id < RTE_MAX_LCORE; lcore_id++)
> > -		rate += (stats[lcore_id].enq_count / TIME_S);
> > +		if (stats[lcore_id].duration_cycles != 0)
> > +			rate += (double)stats[lcore_id].enq_count * hz /
> > +					(double)stats[lcore_id].duration_cycles;
> >
> >  	printf("rate_persec=%" PRIu64 "\n", rate);
> >
> > @@ -287,11 +307,13 @@ launch_cores(struct rte_mempool *mp, unsigned int
> cores)
> >
> >  /* for a given number of core, launch all test cases */
> >  static int
> > -do_one_mempool_test(struct rte_mempool *mp, unsigned int cores)
> > +do_one_mempool_test(struct rte_mempool *mp, unsigned int cores, int
> > external_cache)
> >  {
> > -	unsigned int bulk_tab_get[] = { 1, 4, CACHE_LINE_BURST, 32, 0 };
> > -	unsigned int bulk_tab_put[] = { 1, 4, CACHE_LINE_BURST, 32, 0 };
> > -	unsigned int keep_tab[] = { 32, 128, 512, 0 };
> > +	unsigned int bulk_tab_get[] = { 1, 4, CACHE_LINE_BURST, 32, 64, 128,
> > 256,
> > +			RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_MAX_SIZE, 0 };
> > +	unsigned int bulk_tab_put[] = { 1, 4, CACHE_LINE_BURST, 32, 64, 128,
> > 256,
> > +			RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_MAX_SIZE, 0 };
> > +	unsigned int keep_tab[] = { 32, 128, 512, 2048, 8192, 32768, 0 };
> >  	unsigned *get_bulk_ptr;
> >  	unsigned *put_bulk_ptr;
> >  	unsigned *keep_ptr;
> > @@ -301,6 +323,10 @@ do_one_mempool_test(struct rte_mempool *mp, unsigned
> int
> > cores)
> >  		for (put_bulk_ptr = bulk_tab_put; *put_bulk_ptr; put_bulk_ptr++)
> > {
> >  			for (keep_ptr = keep_tab; *keep_ptr; keep_ptr++) {
> >
> > +				if (*keep_ptr < *get_bulk_ptr || *keep_ptr <
> > *put_bulk_ptr)
> > +					continue;
> > +
> > +				use_external_cache = external_cache;
> >  				use_constant_values = 0;
> >  				n_get_bulk = *get_bulk_ptr;
> >  				n_put_bulk = *put_bulk_ptr;
> > @@ -323,7 +349,7 @@ do_one_mempool_test(struct rte_mempool *mp, unsigned int
> > cores)
> >  }
> >
> >  static int
> > -test_mempool_perf(void)
> > +do_all_mempool_perf_tests(unsigned int cores)
> >  {
> >  	struct rte_mempool *mp_cache = NULL;
> >  	struct rte_mempool *mp_nocache = NULL;
> > @@ -337,8 +363,10 @@ test_mempool_perf(void)
> >  					NULL, NULL,
> >  					my_obj_init, NULL,
> >  					SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
> > -	if (mp_nocache == NULL)
> > +	if (mp_nocache == NULL) {
> > +		printf("cannot allocate mempool (without cache)\n");
> >  		goto err;
> > +	}
> >
> >  	/* create a mempool (with cache) */
> >  	mp_cache = rte_mempool_create("perf_test_cache", MEMPOOL_SIZE,
> > @@ -347,8 +375,10 @@ test_mempool_perf(void)
> >  				      NULL, NULL,
> >  				      my_obj_init, NULL,
> >  				      SOCKET_ID_ANY, 0);
> > -	if (mp_cache == NULL)
> > +	if (mp_cache == NULL) {
> > +		printf("cannot allocate mempool (with cache)\n");
> >  		goto err;
> > +	}
> >
> >  	default_pool_ops = rte_mbuf_best_mempool_ops();
> >  	/* Create a mempool based on Default handler */
> > @@ -376,65 +406,83 @@ test_mempool_perf(void)
> >
> >  	rte_mempool_obj_iter(default_pool, my_obj_init, NULL);
> >
> > -	/* performance test with 1, 2 and max cores */
> >  	printf("start performance test (without cache)\n");
> > -
> > -	if (do_one_mempool_test(mp_nocache, 1) < 0)
> > -		goto err;
> > -
> > -	if (do_one_mempool_test(mp_nocache, 2) < 0)
> > +	if (do_one_mempool_test(mp_nocache, cores, 0) < 0)
> >  		goto err;
> >
> > -	if (do_one_mempool_test(mp_nocache, rte_lcore_count()) < 0)
> > -		goto err;
> > -
> > -	/* performance test with 1, 2 and max cores */
> >  	printf("start performance test for %s (without cache)\n",
> >  	       default_pool_ops);
> > -
> > -	if (do_one_mempool_test(default_pool, 1) < 0)
> > +	if (do_one_mempool_test(default_pool, cores, 0) < 0)
> >  		goto err;
> >
> > -	if (do_one_mempool_test(default_pool, 2) < 0)
> > +	printf("start performance test (with cache)\n");
> > +	if (do_one_mempool_test(mp_cache, cores, 0) < 0)
> >  		goto err;
> >
> > -	if (do_one_mempool_test(default_pool, rte_lcore_count()) < 0)
> > +	printf("start performance test (with user-owned cache)\n");
> > +	if (do_one_mempool_test(mp_nocache, cores, 1) < 0)
> >  		goto err;
> >
> > -	/* performance test with 1, 2 and max cores */
> > -	printf("start performance test (with cache)\n");
> > +	rte_mempool_list_dump(stdout);
> >
> > -	if (do_one_mempool_test(mp_cache, 1) < 0)
> > -		goto err;
> > +	ret = 0;
> >
> > -	if (do_one_mempool_test(mp_cache, 2) < 0)
> > -		goto err;
> > +err:
> > +	rte_mempool_free(mp_cache);
> > +	rte_mempool_free(mp_nocache);
> > +	rte_mempool_free(default_pool);
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> >
> > -	if (do_one_mempool_test(mp_cache, rte_lcore_count()) < 0)
> > -		goto err;
> > +static int
> > +test_mempool_perf_1core(void)
> > +{
> > +	return do_all_mempool_perf_tests(1);
> > +}
> >
> > -	/* performance test with 1, 2 and max cores */
> > -	printf("start performance test (with user-owned cache)\n");
> > -	use_external_cache = 1;
> > +static int
> > +test_mempool_perf_2cores(void)
> > +{
> > +	if (rte_lcore_count() < 2) {
> > +		printf("not enough lcores\n");
> > +		return -1;
> > +	}
> > +	return do_all_mempool_perf_tests(2);
> > +}
> >
> > -	if (do_one_mempool_test(mp_nocache, 1) < 0)
> > -		goto err;
> > +static int
> > +test_mempool_perf_allcores(void)
> > +{
> > +	return do_all_mempool_perf_tests(rte_lcore_count());
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int
> > +test_mempool_perf(void)
> > +{
> > +	int ret = -1;
> >
> > -	if (do_one_mempool_test(mp_nocache, 2) < 0)
> > +	/* performance test with 1, 2 and max cores */
> > +	if (do_all_mempool_perf_tests(1) < 0)
> >  		goto err;
> > +	if (rte_lcore_count() == 1)
> > +		goto done;
> >
> > -	if (do_one_mempool_test(mp_nocache, rte_lcore_count()) < 0)
> > +	if (do_all_mempool_perf_tests(2) < 0)
> >  		goto err;
> > +	if (rte_lcore_count() == 2)
> > +		goto done;
> >
> > -	rte_mempool_list_dump(stdout);
> > +	if (do_all_mempool_perf_tests(rte_lcore_count()) < 0)
> > +		goto err;
> >
> > +done:
> >  	ret = 0;
> >
> >  err:
> > -	rte_mempool_free(mp_cache);
> > -	rte_mempool_free(mp_nocache);
> > -	rte_mempool_free(default_pool);
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> >
> >  REGISTER_PERF_TEST(mempool_perf_autotest, test_mempool_perf);
> > +REGISTER_PERF_TEST(mempool_perf_autotest_1core, test_mempool_perf_1core);
> > +REGISTER_PERF_TEST(mempool_perf_autotest_2cores, test_mempool_perf_2cores);
> > +REGISTER_PERF_TEST(mempool_perf_autotest_allcores,
> > test_mempool_perf_allcores);
> > --
> > 2.17.1


  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-10  8:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-21  4:52 [PATCH] " Morten Brørup
2024-01-22  7:10 ` fengchengwen
2024-01-22 14:34 ` [PATCH v2] " Morten Brørup
2024-01-24  2:41   ` fengchengwen
2024-01-24  8:58 ` [PATCH v3] " Morten Brørup
2024-01-24  9:10 ` [PATCH v4] " Morten Brørup
2024-01-24 11:21 ` [PATCH v5] " Morten Brørup
2024-02-18 18:03   ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-02-20 13:49     ` Morten Brørup
2024-02-21 10:22       ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-02-21 10:38         ` Morten Brørup
2024-02-21 10:40           ` Bruce Richardson
2024-02-20 14:01 ` [PATCH v6] " Morten Brørup
2024-03-02 20:04 ` [PATCH v7] " Morten Brørup
2024-04-04  9:26   ` Morten Brørup
2024-06-10  8:56     ` Morten Brørup [this message]
2024-06-18 13:21       ` Bruce Richardson
2024-06-18 13:48         ` Morten Brørup
2024-09-13 14:58           ` Morten Brørup
2024-09-16 12:40             ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-09-16 13:08               ` Morten Brørup
2024-09-16 14:04                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-09-16 15:37 ` [PATCH v8] " Morten Brørup
2024-09-17  8:10 ` [PATCH v9] " Morten Brørup
2024-10-08  9:14   ` Morten Brørup
2024-10-11 12:50   ` David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35E9F50B@smartserver.smartshare.dk \
    --to=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=fengchengwen@huawei.com \
    --cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).