* questions about pinned external buffers
@ 2025-01-09 12:11 Morten Brørup
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Morten Brørup @ 2025-01-09 12:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shahaf Shuler, Viacheslav Ovsiienko, dev; +Cc: Olivier Matz, thomas
Pinned external buffers were introduced with this patch:
https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h?id=6ef1107ad4c6d4fcb6be627367ee0b97bb13e822
Question 1:
Please confirm that the mbuf's pinned external buffer's refcnt is supposed to be 1 when an mbuf is returned to the mempool?
If so, the below assertion should be updated for completion:
rte_mbuf_raw_free(struct rte_mbuf *m)
{
RTE_ASSERT(!RTE_MBUF_CLONED(m) &&
- (!RTE_MBUF_HAS_EXTBUF(m) || RTE_MBUF_HAS_PINNED_EXTBUF(m)));
+ (!RTE_MBUF_HAS_EXTBUF(m) ||
+ (RTE_MBUF_HAS_PINNED_EXTBUF(m) &&
+ rte_mbuf_ext_refcnt_read(m->shinfo) == 1)));
__rte_mbuf_raw_sanity_check(m);
rte_mempool_put(m->pool, m);
}
The increased performance cost should be acceptable for debug builds (i.e. with assertions enabled).
Question 2:
Could this assertion be moved to __rte_mbuf_raw_sanity_check()?
I'm working on a new rte_mbuf_raw_free_bulk() function, for use with RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_MBUF_FAST_FREE; and if the assertion is not moved to __rte_mbuf_raw_sanity_check(), it needs to be copy-pasted into the new raw_free_bulk() function too.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2025-01-09 12:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-01-09 12:11 questions about pinned external buffers Morten Brørup
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).