From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 653D74610B;
	Sat, 25 Jan 2025 13:56:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C54BB4028A;
	Sat, 25 Jan 2025 13:56:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: from dkmailrelay1.smartsharesystems.com
 (smartserver.smartsharesystems.com [77.243.40.215])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E77B40279
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sat, 25 Jan 2025 13:56:52 +0100 (CET)
Received: from smartserver.smartsharesystems.com
 (smartserver.smartsharesys.local [192.168.4.10])
 by dkmailrelay1.smartsharesystems.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 440FB2056C;
 Sat, 25 Jan 2025 13:56:51 +0100 (CET)
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] lib/hash: avoid implicit conversion to 64 bit number
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2025 13:56:49 +0100
Message-ID: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35E9F9EA@smartserver.smartshare.dk>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
In-Reply-To: <20250123174212.GA9872@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: [PATCH 2/2] lib/hash: avoid implicit conversion to 64 bit number
Thread-Index: AdttviPX7YifoDsQSDKdwzHu1CIPEQBajabg
References: <1732758837-6350-1-git-send-email-andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
 <1732758837-6350-2-git-send-email-andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
 <Z5EZAXq5o9PXx0Be@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <20250122213643.GA26516@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net>
 <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35E9F9DC@smartserver.smartshare.dk>
 <20250123174212.GA9872@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net>
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Morten_Br=F8rup?= <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
To: "Andre Muezerie" <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: "Bruce Richardson" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
 "Yipeng Wang" <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>,
 "Sameh Gobriel" <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>,
 "Vladimir Medvedkin" <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>, <dev@dpdk.org>
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org

> > How about reducing the formula to directly shift the sizeof()
> instead, i.e.:
> > sizeof(uint32_t) << ctx->reta_sz_log,
>=20
> Shifting the sizeof() directly is better indeed. Let me know how we
> should
> proceed. Do you want me to send out a new series incorporating this
> suggestion?

Yes, please.