From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BB3646B80; Tue, 15 Jul 2025 17:04:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD2F440608; Tue, 15 Jul 2025 17:04:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dkmailrelay1.smartsharesystems.com (smartserver.smartsharesystems.com [77.243.40.215]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FB1C4028C; Tue, 15 Jul 2025 17:04:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smartserver.smartsharesystems.com (smartserver.smartsharesys.local [192.168.4.10]) by dkmailrelay1.smartsharesystems.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AADA200BA; Tue, 15 Jul 2025 17:04:45 +0200 (CEST) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH] doc: clarify VLAN and QinQ stripping behaviour X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 17:04:42 +0200 Message-ID: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35E9FDB5@smartserver.smartshare.dk> In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [RFC PATCH] doc: clarify VLAN and QinQ stripping behaviour Thread-Index: Adv031UNKC9n1QYPRsy9LvghDCkGrQADYruw References: <20250714133014.44597-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35E9FDB4@smartserver.smartshare.dk> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Morten_Br=F8rup?= To: "Bruce Richardson" Cc: , "Dengdui Huang" , "Vladimir Medvedkin" , , "Patrick Robb" , "Dean Marx" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org FYI: Last time I looked, it seemed like the VLAN/QINQ "tag present" mbuf RX = flags were only set along with the RX _STRIPPED flags, i.e. not set when = stripping was not enabled. Although setting the "tag present" flags (and the = vlan_tci/vlan_tci_outer fields) without stripping would be nice to have, = I think we should initially focus on stripping behavior.