From: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
To: "Bruce Richardson" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, "Dengdui Huang" <huangdengdui@huawei.com>,
"Vladimir Medvedkin" <medvedkinv@gmail.com>, <techboard@dpdk.org>,
"Patrick Robb" <probb@iol.unh.edu>,
"fengchengwen" <fengchengwen@huawei.com>,
<stephen@networkplumber.org>, <jasvinder.singh@intel.com>,
<thomas@monjalon.net>, <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>,
<lihuisong@huawei.com>, <liuyonglong@huawei.com>,
"Dean Marx" <dmarx@iol.unh.edu>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH] doc: clarify VLAN and QinQ stripping behaviour
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2025 16:51:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35E9FDCD@smartserver.smartshare.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABD7UXOqkROef0_BreD1GHC_R+7EwxRTL8LF-fXQJBECp7J9SA@mail.gmail.com>
> From: Dean Marx [mailto:dmarx@iol.unh.edu]
> Sent: Friday, 18 July 2025 15.18
>
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 4:23 AM Bruce Richardson
> <bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 05:03:13PM -0400, Dean Marx wrote:
> > > I've created a v1 of a QinQ test suite around the set of test cases
> > > discussed earlier (which is not set in stone, and I expect it to
> > > change significantly across many future versions.) The PASS/FAIL
> > > values can be mostly disregarded in the context of this conversation,
> > > but I've added logging to explain which packets are sent, and what
> > > happened upon reception, which I hope will be more informative. After
> > > running on mlx5/i40e drivers, I got the following results:
> > >
> > > test_vlan_strip: QinQ strip OFF and VLAN strip ON
> > > test_qinq_strip: QinQ strip ON and VLAN strip ON
> > >
> > > i40e:
> > > test_qinq_strip (sent packet: Single VLAN): FAIL
> > > reason: VLAN tags found in packet when should have been
> > > stripped: Ether / Dot1Q / 802.1q (0x1c) vlan 1280 / LLC / Raw /
> > > Padding
> > > test_qinq_strip (sent packet: Stacked VLAN): FAIL
> > > reason: Expected one VLAN tag but found 2: Ether / Dot1Q / Dot1Q
> > > / 802.1q (0x1c) vlan 1280 / LLC / Raw / Padding
> > > test_qinq_strip (sent packet: Single S-VLAN): FAIL
> > > reason: VLAN tags found in packet when should have been
> > > stripped: Ether / Dot1Q / 802.1q (??) vlan ?? / LLC / Raw / Padding
> > > test_qinq_strip (sent packet: QinQ): FAIL
> > > reason: VLAN tags found in packet when should have been
> > > stripped: Ether / Dot1Q / Dot1AD / 802.1q (0x1c) vlan 1280 / LLC / Raw
> > > / Padding
> > > test_vlan_strip (sent packet: Single VLAN): PASS
> > > reason: VLAN tag stripped from packet
> > > test_vlan_strip (sent packet: Stacked VLAN): PASS
> > > reason: Received packet had outer VLAN stripped, with inner VLAN
> intact
> > > test_vlan_strip (sent packet: Single S-VLAN): PASS
> > > reason: S-VLAN tag stripped from packet
> > > test_vlan_strip (sent packet: QinQ): FAIL
> > > reason: Neither tag stripped
> > >
> >
> > Can you confirm exactly what is being sent in each case for the ethertype
> > of the VLAN tag? When you say single and stacked VLANs, that is VLANs with
> > 0x8100 type, correct? Is single S-VLAN a tag with ethertype 0x88a8, and
> > QinQ packet a packet with one 0x88a8 and one 0x8100? No other type options,
> > e.g. 0x9100 were checked, right?
> >
> > /Bruce
>
> That's correct, single VLAN is one 0x8100 tag, stacked is two, single
> S-VLAN is one 0x88a8, and QinQ is 0x88a8 and 0x8100. No other types
> were tested in the stripping case
Bruce,
It seems the drivers have the ability to set the EtherType of the Outer (and sometimes Inner) tag:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/dpdk/v25.07/source/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h#L3752
https://elixir.bootlin.com/dpdk/v25.07/source/drivers/net/intel/e1000/igb_ethdev.c#L2739
https://elixir.bootlin.com/dpdk/v25.07/source/drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c#L4038
-Morten
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-28 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-14 13:30 Bruce Richardson
2025-07-14 15:06 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-07-14 15:11 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-07-14 16:33 ` Morten Brørup
2025-07-14 16:49 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-07-15 15:04 ` Morten Brørup
2025-07-15 16:20 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-07-14 20:09 ` Dean Marx
2025-07-14 21:41 ` Patrick Robb
2025-07-15 7:47 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-07-15 21:15 ` Patrick Robb
2025-07-16 10:11 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-07-16 19:24 ` Dean Marx
2025-07-16 19:46 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-07-17 17:45 ` Morten Brørup
2025-07-17 21:03 ` Dean Marx
2025-07-18 8:22 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-07-18 13:18 ` Dean Marx
2025-07-28 14:51 ` Morten Brørup [this message]
2025-07-28 15:11 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-07-28 17:48 ` Morten Brørup
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35E9FDCD@smartserver.smartshare.dk \
--to=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=aman.deep.singh@intel.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=dmarx@iol.unh.edu \
--cc=fengchengwen@huawei.com \
--cc=huangdengdui@huawei.com \
--cc=jasvinder.singh@intel.com \
--cc=lihuisong@huawei.com \
--cc=liuyonglong@huawei.com \
--cc=medvedkinv@gmail.com \
--cc=probb@iol.unh.edu \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=techboard@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).