From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEA9C48A43; Fri, 31 Oct 2025 12:48:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B13D402DC; Fri, 31 Oct 2025 12:48:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from dkmailrelay1.smartsharesystems.com (smartserver.smartsharesystems.com [77.243.40.215]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0465B40150 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2025 12:48:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from smartserver.smartsharesystems.com (smartserver.smartsharesys.local [192.168.4.10]) by dkmailrelay1.smartsharesystems.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBA50206E7; Fri, 31 Oct 2025 12:48:29 +0100 (CET) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] test/memcpy: reduce duration Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 12:48:26 +0100 Message-ID: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35F65521@smartserver.smartshare.dk> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 In-Reply-To: <20251031114310.4062899-1-thomas@monjalon.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [PATCH 1/1] test/memcpy: reduce duration Thread-Index: AdxKW5HGUOdeyl1xRU2L1U6xOCw2nwAAIN9Q References: <20251031114310.4062899-1-thomas@monjalon.net> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Morten_Br=F8rup?= To: "Thomas Monjalon" , Cc: , "Tyler Retzlaff" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net] > Sent: Friday, 31 October 2025 12.43 >=20 > When running on limited platforms like GitHub Actions, > the functional unit test "memcpy_autotest" > may hit a timeout, especially when running with UBSan. >=20 > This change skips testing some alignment offsets (from 0 to 31). > It will test only every 3-byte offsets for the source buffer, > and every 2-byte offsets for the destination buffer. > So it is supposed to be 6x faster with a reasonably smaller coverage. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon > --- Seems reasonable. Acked-by: Morten Br=F8rup