DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
To: "Stephen Hemminger" <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: RE: bugs in rte_pktmbuf_copy
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2025 10:16:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35F6556F@smartserver.smartshare.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251117154320.1fe3c651@phoenix>

> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen@networkplumber.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, 18 November 2025 00.43
> 
> On Mon, 17 Nov 2025 12:51:51 +0100
> Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com> wrote:
> 
> > While working on a rte_pktmbuf_copy_bulk() function, I noticed a
> couple of bugs in rte_pktmbuf_copy():
> >
> > 1. If the copy is allocated from a mempool using pinned external
> buffers, the copy's RTE_MBUF_F_EXTERNAL flag is lost.
> > This is simple to fix:
> >
> > -	/* copied mbuf is not indirect or external */
> > -	mc->ol_flags = m->ol_flags &
> ~(RTE_MBUF_F_INDIRECT|RTE_MBUF_F_EXTERNAL);
> > +	/* copy flags except indirect and external */
> > +	mc->ol_flags |= m->ol_flags &
> ~(RTE_MBUF_F_INDIRECT|RTE_MBUF_F_EXTERNAL);
> 
> Good catch, external flag needs to be preserved.
> 
> 
> > 2. If the packet is copied with non-zero offset, much of the metadata
> do not apply to the copy, e.g. many of the offload flags and the
> packet_type field.
> > Maybe metadata should be reset when copying with a non-zero offset?
> > Or maybe rte_pktmbuf_copy() should be considered "payload copy", so
> the copy should have all metadata reset?
> 
> The use case for using offset, is for removing tunnel headers. I expect
> that the code doing so
> would know what manipulation of offloads was required.

IMO, rte_pktmbuf_copy() should behave the same way as rte_pktmbuf_clone(), which doesn't copy any metadata to the clone.
Reusing your argument: the application would know what manipulation of metadata was required.
WDYT?

Having looked deeper into rte_pktmbuf_copy() now, I think the support for partial copy (offset and length parameters) might have been a mistake, for multiple reasons:
- The rte_pktmbuf_clone() doesn't support partial payload cloning.
- The Kernel's skb_copy() doesn't support partial copy. There are other functions for that.
- If used for tunnels, it only supports decapsulation; it lacks support for encapsulation, i.e. a parameter for specifying extra headroom in the allocated "copy" packet mbuf.
On the positive side, partial copy is useful for packet capturing with header stripping and snap length. So not all bad. :-)

Anyway, removing the offset and length parameters would break the API and ABI, so that's too late now.


      reply	other threads:[~2025-11-18  9:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-17 11:51 Morten Brørup
2025-11-17 23:43 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-11-18  9:16   ` Morten Brørup [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35F6556F@smartserver.smartshare.dk \
    --to=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).