From: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
To: "Konstantin Ananyev" <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>,
<dev@dpdk.org>, <techboard@dpdk.org>,
<bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Subject: RE: mbuf fast-free requirements analysis
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2025 08:33:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35F65601@smartserver.smartshare.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d290adf103244ff7be53844ee32bb6d0@huawei.com>
> From: Konstantin Ananyev [mailto:konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com]
> Sent: Friday, 19 December 2025 18.08
> > > >
> > > > Executive Summary:
> > > >
> > > > My analysis shows that the mbuf library is not a barrier for
> fast-
> > > freeing
> > > > segmented packet mbufs, and thus fast-free of jumbo frames is
> > > possible.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Detailed Analysis:
> > > >
> > > > The purpose of the mbuf fast-free Tx optimization is to reduce
> > > > rte_pktmbuf_free_seg() to something much simpler in the ethdev
> > > drivers, by
> > > > eliminating the code path related to indirect mbufs.
> > > > Optimally, we want to simplify the ethdev driver's function that
> > > frees the
> > > > transmitted mbufs, so it can free them directly to their mempool
> > > without
> > > > accessing the mbufs themselves.
> > > >
> > > > If the driver cannot access the mbuf itself, it cannot determine
> > > which
> > > > mempool it belongs to.
> > > > We don't want the driver to access every mbuf being freed; but if
> all
> > > > mbufs of a Tx queue belong to the same mempool, the driver can
> > > determine
> > > > which mempool by looking into just one of the mbufs.
> > > >
> > > > REQUIREMENT 1: The mbufs of a Tx queue must come from the same
> > > mempool.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > When an mbuf is freed to its mempool, some of the fields in the
> mbuf
> > > must
> > > > be initialized.
> > > > So, for fast-free, this must be done by the driver's function
> that
> > > > prepares the Tx descriptor.
> > > > This is a requirement to the driver, not a requirement to the
> > > application.
> > > >
> > > > Now, let's dig into the code for freeing an mbuf.
> > > > Note: For readability purposes, I'll cut out some code and
> comments
> > > > unrelated to this topic.
> > > >
> > > > static __rte_always_inline void
> > > > rte_pktmbuf_free_seg(struct rte_mbuf *m)
> > > > {
> > > > m = rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(m);
> > > > if (likely(m != NULL))
> > > > rte_mbuf_raw_free(m);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > rte_mbuf_raw_free(m) is simple, so nothing to gain there:
> > > >
> > > > /**
> > > > * Put mbuf back into its original mempool.
> > > > *
> > > > * The caller must ensure that the mbuf is direct and properly
> > > > * reinitialized (refcnt=1, next=NULL, nb_segs=1), as done by
> > > > * rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg().
> > > > */
> > > > static __rte_always_inline void
> > > > rte_mbuf_raw_free(struct rte_mbuf *m)
> > > > {
> > > > rte_mbuf_history_mark(m, RTE_MBUF_HISTORY_OP_LIB_FREE);
> > > > rte_mempool_put(m->pool, m);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > Note that the description says that the mbuf must be direct.
> > > > This is not entirely accurate; the mbuf is allowed to use a
> pinned
> > > > external buffer, if the mbuf holds the only reference to it.
> > > > (Most of the mbuf library functions have this documentation
> > > inaccuracy,
> > > > which should be fixed some day.)
> > > >
> > > > So, the fast-free optimization really comes down to
> > > > rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(m), which must not return NULL.
> > > >
> > > > Let's dig into that.
> > > >
> > > > /**
> > > > * Decrease reference counter and unlink a mbuf segment
> > > > *
> > > > * This function does the same than a free, except that it does
> not
> > > > * return the segment to its pool.
> > > > * It decreases the reference counter, and if it reaches 0, it is
> > > > * detached from its parent for an indirect mbuf.
> > > > *
> > > > * @return
> > > > * - (m) if it is the last reference. It can be recycled or
> freed.
> > > > * - (NULL) if the mbuf still has remaining references on it.
> > > > */
> > > > static __rte_always_inline struct rte_mbuf *
> > > > rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(struct rte_mbuf *m)
> > > > {
> > > > bool refcnt_not_one;
> > > >
> > > > refcnt_not_one = unlikely(rte_mbuf_refcnt_read(m) != 1);
> > > > if (refcnt_not_one && __rte_mbuf_refcnt_update(m, -1) != 0)
> > > > return NULL;
> > > >
> > > > if (unlikely(!RTE_MBUF_DIRECT(m))) {
> > > > rte_pktmbuf_detach(m);
> > > > if (RTE_MBUF_HAS_EXTBUF(m) &&
> > > > RTE_MBUF_HAS_PINNED_EXTBUF(m) &&
> > > > __rte_pktmbuf_pinned_extbuf_decref(m))
> > > > return NULL;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > if (refcnt_not_one)
> > > > rte_mbuf_refcnt_set(m, 1);
> > > > if (m->nb_segs != 1)
> > > > m->nb_segs = 1;
> > > > if (m->next != NULL)
> > > > m->next = NULL;
> > > >
> > > > return m;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > This function can only succeed (i.e. return non-NULL) when
> 'refcnt'
> > > is 1
> > > > (or reaches 0).
> > > >
> > > > REQUIREMENT 2: The driver must hold the only reference to the
> mbuf,
> > > > i.e. 'm->refcnt' must be 1.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > When the function succeeds, it initializes the mbuf fields as
> > > required by
> > > > rte_mbuf_raw_free() before returning.
> > > >
> > > > Now, since the driver has exclusive access to the mbuf, it is
> free to
> > > > initialize the 'm->next' and 'm->nb_segs' at any time.
> > > > It could do that when preparing the Tx descriptor.
> > > >
> > > > This is very interesting, because it means that fast-free does
> not
> > > > prohibit segmented packets!
> > > > (But the driver must have sufficient Tx descriptors for all
> segments
> > > in
> > > > the mbuf.)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Now, lets dig into rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg()'s block handling
> non-
> > > direct
> > > > mbufs, i.e. cloned mbufs and mbufs with external buffer:
> > > >
> > > > if (unlikely(!RTE_MBUF_DIRECT(m))) {
> > > > rte_pktmbuf_detach(m);
> > > > if (RTE_MBUF_HAS_EXTBUF(m) &&
> > > > RTE_MBUF_HAS_PINNED_EXTBUF(m) &&
> > > > __rte_pktmbuf_pinned_extbuf_decref(m))
> > > > return NULL;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > Starting with rte_pktmbuf_detach():
> > > >
> > > > static inline void rte_pktmbuf_detach(struct rte_mbuf *m)
> > > > {
> > > > struct rte_mempool *mp = m->pool;
> > > > uint32_t mbuf_size, buf_len;
> > > > uint16_t priv_size;
> > > >
> > > > if (RTE_MBUF_HAS_EXTBUF(m)) {
> > > > /*
> > > > * The mbuf has the external attached buffer,
> > > > * we should check the type of the memory pool where
> > > > * the mbuf was allocated from to detect the pinned
> > > > * external buffer.
> > > > */
> > > > uint32_t flags = rte_pktmbuf_priv_flags(mp);
> > > >
> > > > if (flags & RTE_PKTMBUF_POOL_F_PINNED_EXT_BUF) {
> > > > /*
> > > > * The pinned external buffer should not be
> > > > * detached from its backing mbuf, just exit.
> > > > */
> > > > return;
> > > > }
> > > > __rte_pktmbuf_free_extbuf(m);
> > > > } else {
> > > > __rte_pktmbuf_free_direct(m);
> > > > }
> > > > priv_size = rte_pktmbuf_priv_size(mp);
> > > > mbuf_size = (uint32_t)(sizeof(struct rte_mbuf) +
> priv_size);
> > > > buf_len = rte_pktmbuf_data_room_size(mp);
> > > >
> > > > m->priv_size = priv_size;
> > > > m->buf_addr = (char *)m + mbuf_size;
> > > > rte_mbuf_iova_set(m, rte_mempool_virt2iova(m) + mbuf_size);
> > > > m->buf_len = (uint16_t)buf_len;
> > > > rte_pktmbuf_reset_headroom(m);
> > > > m->data_len = 0;
> > > > m->ol_flags = 0;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > The only quick and simple code path through this function is when
> the
> > > mbuf
> > > > uses a pinned external buffer:
> > > > if (RTE_MBUF_HAS_EXTBUF(m)) {
> > > > uint32_t flags = rte_pktmbuf_priv_flags(mp);
> > > > if (flags & RTE_PKTMBUF_POOL_F_PINNED_EXT_BUF)
> > > > return;
> > > >
> > > > REQUIREMENT 3: The mbuf must not be cloned or use a non-pinned
> > > external
> > > > buffer.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Continuing with the next part of rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg()'s
> block:
> > > > if (RTE_MBUF_HAS_EXTBUF(m) &&
> > > > RTE_MBUF_HAS_PINNED_EXTBUF(m) &&
> > > > __rte_pktmbuf_pinned_extbuf_decref(m))
> > > > return NULL;
> > > >
> > > > Continuing with the next part of the block in
> > > rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg():
> > > >
> > > > /**
> > > > * @internal Handle the packet mbufs with attached pinned
> external
> > > buffer
> > > > * on the mbuf freeing:
> > > > *
> > > > * - return zero if reference counter in shinfo is one. It means
> > > there is
> > > > * no more reference to this pinned buffer and mbuf can be
> returned
> > > to
> > > > * the pool
> > > > *
> > > > * - otherwise (if reference counter is not one), decrement
> > > reference
> > > > * counter and return non-zero value to prevent freeing the
> backing
> > > mbuf.
> > > > *
> > > > * Returns non zero if mbuf should not be freed.
> > > > */
> > > > static inline int __rte_pktmbuf_pinned_extbuf_decref(struct
> rte_mbuf
> > > *m)
> > > > {
> > > > struct rte_mbuf_ext_shared_info *shinfo;
> > > >
> > > > /* Clear flags, mbuf is being freed. */
> > > > m->ol_flags = RTE_MBUF_F_EXTERNAL;
> > > > shinfo = m->shinfo;
> > > >
> > > > /* Optimize for performance - do not dec/reinit */
> > > > if (likely(rte_mbuf_ext_refcnt_read(shinfo) == 1))
> > > > return 0;
> > > >
> > > > /*
> > > > * Direct usage of add primitive to avoid
> > > > * duplication of comparing with one.
> > > > */
> > > > if (likely(rte_atomic_fetch_add_explicit(&shinfo->refcnt, -
> 1,
> > > > rte_memory_order_acq_rel) - 1))
> > > > return 1;
> > > >
> > > > /* Reinitialize counter before mbuf freeing. */
> > > > rte_mbuf_ext_refcnt_set(shinfo, 1);
> > > > return 0;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > Essentially, if the mbuf does use a pinned external buffer,
> > > > rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg() only succeeds if that pinned external
> > > buffer is
> > > > only referred to by the mbuf.
> > > >
> > > > REQUIREMENT 4: If the mbuf uses a pinned external buffer, the
> mbuf
> > > must
> > > > hold the only reference to that pinned external buffer, i.e. in
> that
> > > case,
> > > > 'm->shinfo->refcnt' must be 1.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Please review.
> > > >
> > > > If I'm not mistaken, the mbuf library is not a barrier for fast-
> > > freeing
> > > > segmented packet mbufs, and thus fast-free of jumbo frames is
> > > possible.
> > > >
> > > > We need a driver developer to confirm that my suggested approach
> -
> > > > resetting the mbuf fields, incl. 'm->nb_segs' and 'm->next', when
> > > > preparing the Tx descriptor - is viable.
> > >
> > > Great analysis, makes a lot of sense to me.
> > > Shall we add then a special API to make PMD maintainers life a bit
> > > easier:
> > > Something like rte_mbuf_fast_free_prep(mp, mb), that will
> optionally
> > > check
> > > that requirements outlined above are satisfied for given mbuf and
> > > also reset mbuf fields to expected values?
> >
> > Good idea, Konstantin.
> >
> > Detailed suggestion below.
> > Note that __rte_mbuf_raw_sanity_check_mp() is used to checks the
> requirements
> > after 'nb_segs' and 'next' have been initialized.
> >
> > /**
> > * Reinitialize an mbuf for freeing back into the mempool.
> > *
> > * The caller must ensure that the mbuf comes from the specified
> mempool,
> > * is direct and only referred to by the caller (refcnt=1).
> > *
> > * This function is used by drivers in their transmit function for
> mbuf fast release
> > * when the transmit descriptor is initialized,
> > * so the driver can call rte_mbuf_raw_free()
> > * when the packet segment has been transmitted.
> > *
> > * @see RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_MBUF_FAST_FREE
> > *
> > * @param mp
> > * The mempool to which the mbuf belong.
> > * @param m
> > * The mbuf being reinitialized.
> > */
> > static __rte_always_inline void
> > rte_mbuf_raw_prefree_seg(const struct rte_mempool *mp, struct
> rte_mbuf *m)
> > {
> > if (m->nb_segs != 1)
> > m->nb_segs = 1;
> > if (m->next != NULL)
> > m->next = NULL;
> >
> > __rte_mbuf_raw_sanity_check_mp(m, mp);
> > rte_mbuf_history_mark(mbuf,
> > RTE_MBUF_HISTORY_OP_LIB_PREFREE_RAW);
> > }
>
> Thanks Morten, though should we really panic if condition is not met?
> Might be just do check first and return an error.
__rte_mbuf_raw_sanity_check_mp() is a no-op unless RTE_LIBRTE_MBUF_DEBUG is enabled.
Using it everywhere in alloc/free in the mbuf library is the convention.
And if we don't do it here, the __rte_mbuf_raw_sanity_check_mp() in rte_mbuf_raw_free() will panic later instead.
Better to fail early.
>
> >
> > /**
> > * Reinitialize a bulk of mbufs for freeing back into the mempool.
> > *
> > * The caller must ensure that the mbufs come from the specified
> mempool,
> > * are direct and only referred to by the caller (refcnt=1).
> > *
> > * This function is used by drivers in their transmit function for
> mbuf fast release
> > * when the transmit descriptors are initialized,
> > * so the driver can call rte_mbuf_raw_free_bulk()
> > * when the packet segments have been transmitted.
> > *
> > * @see RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_MBUF_FAST_FREE
> > *
> > * @param mp
> > * The mempool to which the mbufs belong.
> > * @param mbufs
> > * Array of pointers to mbufs being reinitialized.
> > * The array must not contain NULL pointers.
> > * @param count
> > * Array size.
> > */
> > static __rte_always_inline void
> > rte_mbuf_raw_prefree_seg_bulk(const struct rte_mempool *mp, struct
> rte_mbuf
> > **mbufs, unsigned int count)
> > {
> > for (unsigned int idx = 0; idx < count; idx++) {
> > struct rte_mbuf *m = mbufs[idx];
> >
> > if (m->nb_segs != 1)
> > m->nb_segs = 1;
> > if (m->next != NULL)
> > m->next = NULL;
> >
> > __rte_mbuf_raw_sanity_check_mp(m, mp);
> > }
> > rte_mbuf_history_mark_bulk(mbufs, count,
> > RTE_MBUF_HISTORY_OP_LIB_PREFREE_RAW);
> > }
> >
> > > Konstantin
> > >
> > >
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-20 7:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-15 11:06 Morten Brørup
2025-12-15 11:46 ` Bruce Richardson
2025-12-15 14:41 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2025-12-15 16:14 ` Morten Brørup
2025-12-19 17:08 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2025-12-20 7:33 ` Morten Brørup [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35F65601@smartserver.smartshare.dk \
--to=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com \
--cc=techboard@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).