DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
To: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
	Chenbo Xia <chenbo.xia@intel.com>,
	Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>,
	Remy Horton <remy.horton@intel.com>,
	Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Ivan Ilchenko <ivan.ilchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
	stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/virtio: remove handling of zero desc number on RxQ setup
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 09:40:09 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <997133b4-176e-44f2-1340-b66a3a72e182@oktetlabs.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47446316-5d49-9bf7-1d6c-3a422e045e11@redhat.com>

On 9/13/21 10:25 PM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> 
> 
> On 8/20/21 2:47 PM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
>> From: Ivan Ilchenko <ivan.ilchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
>>
>> Rx queue setup callback allows to use the whole ring when
>> descriptor number argument equals zero. There's no point to
>> handle zero in any way since RTE Rx queue setup function
>> rte_eth_rx_queue_setup() doesn't pass zero using fallback
>> values.
>>
>> Fixes: 3be82f5cc5e3 ("ethdev: support PMD-tuned Tx/Rx parameters")
>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ivan Ilchenko <ivan.ilchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
>> index 8a48fba5cc..18f03c9fc9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
>> @@ -706,7 +706,7 @@ virtio_dev_rx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>>  	}
>>  	vq->vq_free_thresh = rx_free_thresh;
>>  
>> -	if (nb_desc == 0 || nb_desc > vq->vq_nentries)
>> +	if (nb_desc > vq->vq_nentries)
>>  		nb_desc = vq->vq_nentries;
>>  	vq->vq_free_cnt = RTE_MIN(vq->vq_free_cnt, nb_desc);
>>  
>>
> 
> Is that really a fix?
> I see it more like an optimization in a cold path, so maybe it is not
> worth backporting?

The main idea is not an optimization, but simplification of
the code to make it easier to understand. Less special
cases is better.

I agree that it does not make sense to backport it.

> Other than that:
> Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>

Thanks,
Andrew.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-14  6:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-20 12:47 Andrew Rybchenko
2021-09-13 19:25 ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-09-14  6:40   ` Andrew Rybchenko [this message]
2021-09-14  7:26     ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-09-14  7:33       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-09-14 11:24 ` Maxime Coquelin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=997133b4-176e-44f2-1340-b66a3a72e182@oktetlabs.ru \
    --to=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=chenbo.xia@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=ivan.ilchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=remy.horton@intel.com \
    --cc=shreyansh.jain@nxp.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).