From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A3E7F24
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 03:32:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23])
 by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Oct 2014 19:41:33 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,807,1406617200"; d="scan'208";a="613163844"
Received: from pgsmsx101.gar.corp.intel.com ([10.221.44.78])
 by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Oct 2014 19:38:05 -0700
Received: from kmsmsx151.gar.corp.intel.com (172.21.73.86) by
 PGSMSX101.gar.corp.intel.com (10.221.44.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
 id 14.3.195.1; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 10:35:42 +0800
Received: from shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.154) by
 KMSMSX151.gar.corp.intel.com (172.21.73.86) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
 id 14.3.195.1; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 10:35:41 +0800
Received: from shsmsx104.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.174]) by
 shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.156]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001;
 Wed, 29 Oct 2014 10:35:40 +0800
From: "Wu, Jingjing" <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 21/21] testpmd: add test command to
 configure flexible masks
Thread-Index: AQHP7ZPmRVSSamVX7EiAbeked/hhJ5xFErGAgAFPbnA=
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 02:35:40 +0000
Message-ID: <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F8B24F81@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
References: <1411711418-12881-1-git-send-email-jingjing.wu@intel.com>
 <1413939687-11177-1-git-send-email-jingjing.wu@intel.com>
 <1413939687-11177-22-git-send-email-jingjing.wu@intel.com>
 <6372294.ZImQoBpb39@xps13>
In-Reply-To: <6372294.ZImQoBpb39@xps13>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 21/21] testpmd: add test command to
 configure flexible masks
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 02:32:47 -0000



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 10:18 PM
> To: Wu, Jingjing
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 21/21] testpmd: add test command to
> configure flexible masks
>=20
> 2014-10-22 09:01, Jingjing Wu:
> > add test command to configure flexible masks for each flow type
> [...]
> > --- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> > +++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
> > +			"flow_director_flex_mask (port_id)"
> > +			" flow
> (ether|ip4|tcp4|udp4|sctp4|ip6|tcp6|udp6|sctp6)"
> > +			" words_mask (words) (word_mask_list)\n"
> > +			"    Configure mask of flex payload.\n\n"
>=20
> Does it mean we cannot use it for PPP? or for IP over PPPoE?
>=20

Yes, we cannot use it for PPP. While about IP over PPPoE, I haven't test it=
 yet. I have no idea
What the hardware will consider such packet as IP or Ethernet? I guess it w=
ill be Ethernet.

> --
> Thomas