DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: "Jakub Grajciar -X (jgrajcia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)"
	<jgrajcia@cisco.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC v3] net/memif: allow for full key size in socket name
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 19:47:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9c577458-7410-71d2-2a67-e28fcefecf62@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55a3d547efc04ad48ea416aae76cf0e0@XCH-ALN-004.cisco.com>

On 8/30/2019 8:17 AM, Jakub Grajciar -X (jgrajcia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at
Cisco) wrote:
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2019 7:21 PM
>> To: dev@dpdk.org; Jakub Grajciar -X (jgrajcia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at
>> Cisco) <jgrajcia@cisco.com>
>> Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
>> Subject: [RFC v3] net/memif: allow for full key size in socket name
>>
>> The key size for memif is 256 but the unix domain socket structure has
>> space for 100 bytes. Change it to use a larger buffer and not hard
>> code the keysize everywhere.
>>
>> Not sure what purpose of socket is anyway since there is no code
>> which connects to it in the current tree anyway?
> 
> 	See memif_connect_slave in memif_socket.c
> 
>>
>> Still an RFC, have no way to test.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> 
> Tested-by: Jakub Grajciar <jgrajcia@cisco.com>
> 

Applied to dpdk-next-net/master, thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-13 18:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-08 16:06 [dpdk-dev] [RFC] " Stephen Hemminger
2019-07-16 17:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC v2] " Stephen Hemminger
2019-07-16 17:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC v3] " Stephen Hemminger
2019-08-30  7:17   ` Jakub Grajciar -X (jgrajcia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
2019-09-13 18:47     ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2019-10-04 12:41   ` Yigit, Ferruh
2019-10-07  9:01     ` Jakub Grajciar -X (jgrajcia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
2019-10-07 15:21       ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9c577458-7410-71d2-2a67-e28fcefecf62@intel.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jgrajcia@cisco.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).