From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9026FA04DB; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 23:58:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71AE5BE31; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 23:58:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20030BE2F; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 23:58:38 +0200 (CEST) IronPort-SDR: ItYlrUkZmDbUctZJ/SmcthpsfDbhl+t7LTFXnO/5VrolcSN0psVyt/ffPW5MT4pwZRTUl9DO24 oitiL/9AMBTA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9776"; a="153615584" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,384,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="153615584" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Oct 2020 14:58:32 -0700 IronPort-SDR: nKeGBYH+TsQd8u/3DcgJVko6Bqg3RFyEB7YK9NesKb3p2bcBtMKYlOJCtFZ+PgAao7gx79eZBN BqniHC1ur9sQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,384,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="531886511" Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.252.19.66]) ([10.252.19.66]) by orsmga005-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Oct 2020 14:58:30 -0700 From: Ferruh Yigit To: Andrew Rybchenko , dev@dpdk.org Cc: Thomas Monjalon , Andrew Rybchenko , "techboard@dpdk.org" References: <1602600818-7473-1-git-send-email-arybchenko@solarflare.com> <8f8907cf-d905-c867-cf42-694d16b0a0cf@intel.com> <76f63a45-01a5-a3d1-2107-37fe8cf5ca2d@intel.com> Message-ID: <9dcbd6e0-265c-f520-d060-1ab494a9e53f@intel.com> Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 22:58:26 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <76f63a45-01a5-a3d1-2107-37fe8cf5ca2d@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: unify error code if port ID is invalid X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 10/16/2020 1:05 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 10/13/2020 4:32 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: >> On 10/13/2020 3:53 PM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote: >>> Use ENODEV as the error code if specified port ID is invalid. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko >>> --- >>>   lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++---------------- >>>   lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------- >>>   2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c >>> index 5b7979a3b8..1f862f918a 100644 >>> --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c >>> +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c >>> @@ -784,7 +784,7 @@ rte_eth_dev_get_name_by_port(uint16_t port_id, char *name) >>>   { >>>       char *tmp; >>> -    RTE_ETH_VALID_PORTID_OR_ERR_RET(port_id, -EINVAL); >>> +    RTE_ETH_VALID_PORTID_OR_ERR_RET(port_id, -ENODEV); >> >> Thanks Andrew, +1 to this error unification. >> >> This will be API change without deprecation notice, cc'ed techboard for it. >> >> If this should (almost) always return '-ENODEV', does it make sense to make >> another wrapper macro for it, to prevent later other error types used again. >> >> And there are a few instances returning '-1', are they left intentionally? >> > > Reviewed-by: Ferruh Yigit > Applied to dpdk-next-net/main, thanks.