From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E70902BC9 for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2017 12:04:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Aug 2017 03:04:11 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.41,320,1498546800"; d="scan'208";a="133522441" Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.220.48]) ([10.237.220.48]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Aug 2017 03:04:10 -0700 To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: dev@dpdk.org, John McNamara , Olivier Matz References: <20170720092303.97525-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> <46961328.cqyKbn3m1e@xps> <628b3af4-6c4e-f262-110d-f899f0422501@intel.com> <1557856.DY0fuUa5Sa@xps> From: Ferruh Yigit Message-ID: <9e854181-70a1-810d-8e6e-ebf6589bab00@intel.com> Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 11:04:09 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1557856.DY0fuUa5Sa@xps> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] doc: document NIC features X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2017 10:04:13 -0000 On 8/4/2017 10:32 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 04/08/2017 10:56, Ferruh Yigit: >> On 8/3/2017 11:57 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >>> 01/08/2017 17:23, Ferruh Yigit: >>>> +:orphan: >>>> + >>>> +.. _nic_overview_features: >>> >>> Why have you done an orphan page? >>> I think it should be in doc/guides/nics/overview.rst >> >> There is a link from nics/overview.rst to this file. But this file is >> not in the index and not making it orphan is causing a build warning. > > But why creating a new page? > It could be below the table in overview.rst. Overview page is mostly just a table, this is more simple and clean I believe. Instead, I was thinking to be able to find a way to make each feature name a link to its description in this file.