DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ixgbe: fix ntuple filter support for sctp
@ 2017-04-27  3:14 Wei Zhao
  2017-04-27  4:53 ` Ferruh Yigit
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wei Zhao @ 2017-04-27  3:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dev; +Cc: Wei Zhao

Add the support of RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_SCTP type packet for
ixgbe ntuple filter.

Fixes: 672be56d76a ("net/ixgbe: parse n-tuple filter")

Signed-off-by: Wei Zhao <wei.zhao1@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow.c b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow.c
index e2ba9c2..2c18bcd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow.c
@@ -142,6 +142,8 @@ cons_parse_ntuple_filter(const struct rte_flow_attr *attr,
 	const struct rte_flow_item_tcp *tcp_mask;
 	const struct rte_flow_item_udp *udp_spec;
 	const struct rte_flow_item_udp *udp_mask;
+	const struct rte_flow_item_sctp *sctp_spec;
+	const struct rte_flow_item_sctp *sctp_mask;
 	uint32_t index;
 
 	if (!pattern) {
@@ -319,7 +321,7 @@ cons_parse_ntuple_filter(const struct rte_flow_attr *attr,
 		filter->dst_port  = tcp_spec->hdr.dst_port;
 		filter->src_port  = tcp_spec->hdr.src_port;
 		filter->tcp_flags = tcp_spec->hdr.tcp_flags;
-	} else {
+	} else if (item->type == RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_UDP) {
 		udp_mask = (const struct rte_flow_item_udp *)item->mask;
 
 		/**
@@ -342,6 +344,29 @@ cons_parse_ntuple_filter(const struct rte_flow_attr *attr,
 		udp_spec = (const struct rte_flow_item_udp *)item->spec;
 		filter->dst_port = udp_spec->hdr.dst_port;
 		filter->src_port = udp_spec->hdr.src_port;
+	} else {
+		sctp_mask = (const struct rte_flow_item_sctp *)item->mask;
+
+		/**
+		 * Only support src & dst ports,
+		 * others should be masked.
+		 */
+		if (sctp_mask->hdr.tag ||
+		    sctp_mask->hdr.cksum) {
+			memset(filter, 0,
+				sizeof(struct rte_eth_ntuple_filter));
+			rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
+				RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM,
+				item, "Not supported by ntuple filter");
+			return -rte_errno;
+		}
+
+		filter->dst_port_mask = sctp_mask->hdr.dst_port;
+		filter->src_port_mask = sctp_mask->hdr.src_port;
+
+		sctp_spec = (const struct rte_flow_item_sctp *)item->spec;
+		filter->dst_port = sctp_spec->hdr.dst_port;
+		filter->src_port = sctp_spec->hdr.src_port;
 	}
 
 	/* check if the next not void item is END */
-- 
2.9.3

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ixgbe: fix ntuple filter support for sctp
  2017-04-27  3:14 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ixgbe: fix ntuple filter support for sctp Wei Zhao
@ 2017-04-27  4:53 ` Ferruh Yigit
  2017-04-27  5:39   ` Zhao1, Wei
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ferruh Yigit @ 2017-04-27  4:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wei Zhao, dev

On 4/27/2017 4:14 AM, Wei Zhao wrote:
> Add the support of RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_SCTP type packet for
> ixgbe ntuple filter.

The function comment also should be updated for this pattern type.

And is this a fix or adding new type support? If this is not fixing
something existing, lets postpone this to next release.

> 
> Fixes: 672be56d76a ("net/ixgbe: parse n-tuple filter")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Zhao <wei.zhao1@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow.c b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow.c
> index e2ba9c2..2c18bcd 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow.c
> @@ -142,6 +142,8 @@ cons_parse_ntuple_filter(const struct rte_flow_attr *attr,
>  	const struct rte_flow_item_tcp *tcp_mask;
>  	const struct rte_flow_item_udp *udp_spec;
>  	const struct rte_flow_item_udp *udp_mask;
> +	const struct rte_flow_item_sctp *sctp_spec;
> +	const struct rte_flow_item_sctp *sctp_mask;
>  	uint32_t index;
>  
>  	if (!pattern) {
> @@ -319,7 +321,7 @@ cons_parse_ntuple_filter(const struct rte_flow_attr *attr,
>  		filter->dst_port  = tcp_spec->hdr.dst_port;
>  		filter->src_port  = tcp_spec->hdr.src_port;
>  		filter->tcp_flags = tcp_spec->hdr.tcp_flags;
> -	} else {
> +	} else if (item->type == RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_UDP) {
>  		udp_mask = (const struct rte_flow_item_udp *)item->mask;
>  
>  		/**
> @@ -342,6 +344,29 @@ cons_parse_ntuple_filter(const struct rte_flow_attr *attr,
>  		udp_spec = (const struct rte_flow_item_udp *)item->spec;
>  		filter->dst_port = udp_spec->hdr.dst_port;
>  		filter->src_port = udp_spec->hdr.src_port;
> +	} else {

There is a check for this item if it is TCP or UDP, else it returns an
error (in line 255), so it should not be hitting this else at all, am I
missing something?

> +		sctp_mask = (const struct rte_flow_item_sctp *)item->mask;
> +
> +		/**
> +		 * Only support src & dst ports,
> +		 * others should be masked.
> +		 */
> +		if (sctp_mask->hdr.tag ||
> +		    sctp_mask->hdr.cksum) {
> +			memset(filter, 0,
> +				sizeof(struct rte_eth_ntuple_filter));
> +			rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
> +				RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM,
> +				item, "Not supported by ntuple filter");
> +			return -rte_errno;
> +		}
> +
> +		filter->dst_port_mask = sctp_mask->hdr.dst_port;
> +		filter->src_port_mask = sctp_mask->hdr.src_port;
> +
> +		sctp_spec = (const struct rte_flow_item_sctp *)item->spec;
> +		filter->dst_port = sctp_spec->hdr.dst_port;
> +		filter->src_port = sctp_spec->hdr.src_port;
>  	}
>  
>  	/* check if the next not void item is END */
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ixgbe: fix ntuple filter support for sctp
  2017-04-27  4:53 ` Ferruh Yigit
@ 2017-04-27  5:39   ` Zhao1, Wei
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Zhao1, Wei @ 2017-04-27  5:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yigit, Ferruh, dev

Hi,  Ferruh

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yigit, Ferruh
> Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2017 12:53 PM
> To: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zhao1@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ixgbe: fix ntuple filter support for sctp
> 
> On 4/27/2017 4:14 AM, Wei Zhao wrote:
> > Add the support of RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_SCTP type packet for ixgbe
> > ntuple filter.
> 
> The function comment also should be updated for this pattern type.
> 
> And is this a fix or adding new type support? If this is not fixing something
> existing, lets postpone this to next release.
> 

No, it is a fix patch for our missing support for sctp packet type filter.
There are also other 2 had better been merge to this release also, they are high risk bug need to be fix.  
http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/23761/
http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/23760/

> >
> > Fixes: 672be56d76a ("net/ixgbe: parse n-tuple filter")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Zhao <wei.zhao1@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow.c
> > b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow.c index e2ba9c2..2c18bcd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_flow.c
> > @@ -142,6 +142,8 @@ cons_parse_ntuple_filter(const struct rte_flow_attr
> *attr,
> >  	const struct rte_flow_item_tcp *tcp_mask;
> >  	const struct rte_flow_item_udp *udp_spec;
> >  	const struct rte_flow_item_udp *udp_mask;
> > +	const struct rte_flow_item_sctp *sctp_spec;
> > +	const struct rte_flow_item_sctp *sctp_mask;
> >  	uint32_t index;
> >
> >  	if (!pattern) {
> > @@ -319,7 +321,7 @@ cons_parse_ntuple_filter(const struct rte_flow_attr
> *attr,
> >  		filter->dst_port  = tcp_spec->hdr.dst_port;
> >  		filter->src_port  = tcp_spec->hdr.src_port;
> >  		filter->tcp_flags = tcp_spec->hdr.tcp_flags;
> > -	} else {
> > +	} else if (item->type == RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_UDP) {
> >  		udp_mask = (const struct rte_flow_item_udp *)item->mask;
> >
> >  		/**
> > @@ -342,6 +344,29 @@ cons_parse_ntuple_filter(const struct
> rte_flow_attr *attr,
> >  		udp_spec = (const struct rte_flow_item_udp *)item->spec;
> >  		filter->dst_port = udp_spec->hdr.dst_port;
> >  		filter->src_port = udp_spec->hdr.src_port;
> > +	} else {
> 
> There is a check for this item if it is TCP or UDP, else it returns an error (in line
> 255), so it should not be hitting this else at all, am I missing something?

Yes,  you are right, I miss SOME in line 255, a v2 later to be commit.

> 
> > +		sctp_mask = (const struct rte_flow_item_sctp *)item->mask;
> > +
> > +		/**
> > +		 * Only support src & dst ports,
> > +		 * others should be masked.
> > +		 */
> > +		if (sctp_mask->hdr.tag ||
> > +		    sctp_mask->hdr.cksum) {
> > +			memset(filter, 0,
> > +				sizeof(struct rte_eth_ntuple_filter));
> > +			rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
> > +				RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM,
> > +				item, "Not supported by ntuple filter");
> > +			return -rte_errno;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		filter->dst_port_mask = sctp_mask->hdr.dst_port;
> > +		filter->src_port_mask = sctp_mask->hdr.src_port;
> > +
> > +		sctp_spec = (const struct rte_flow_item_sctp *)item->spec;
> > +		filter->dst_port = sctp_spec->hdr.dst_port;
> > +		filter->src_port = sctp_spec->hdr.src_port;
> >  	}
> >
> >  	/* check if the next not void item is END */
> >


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-04-27  5:40 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-04-27  3:14 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ixgbe: fix ntuple filter support for sctp Wei Zhao
2017-04-27  4:53 ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-04-27  5:39   ` Zhao1, Wei

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).