* Re: [dpdk-dev] using rte_flow via tespmd with Intel X552 [not found] ` <42be0cc3-a69b-4e07-be84-41a8deba75cf@lab.ntt.co.jp> @ 2017-08-02 7:28 ` Zhao1, Wei 2017-08-02 9:02 ` TETSURO NAKAMURA 2017-08-02 13:00 ` Lu, Wenzhuo 0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Zhao1, Wei @ 2017-08-02 7:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: TETSURO NAKAMURA; +Cc: TAKADA Naoki, Satoshi NISHIYAMA, Lu, Wenzhuo, dev Hi, NAKAMURA I have upload 2 documents about command format when creating flow for NIC igb and ixgbe in the email attachment. I have decided to commit the context in the doc to doc\guides\nics\ixgbe.rst before, BUT by now it seems the content of the document is too much To store there. So, is there any other doc more suitable in DPDK to record this. And welcome for any other suggestion. AND, Wenzhuo, what is your opinion for this? > -----Original Message----- > From: TETSURO NAKAMURA [mailto:nakamura.tetsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp] > Sent: Wednesday, August 2, 2017 12:22 PM > To: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zhao1@intel.com> > Cc: TAKADA Naoki <takada.naoki@lab.ntt.co.jp>; Satoshi NISHIYAMA > <nishiyama.s@lab.ntt.co.jp>; Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; > dev@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: using rte_flow via tespmd with Intel X552 > > Wei Zhao - san > (Cc'ing Wenzhuo - san) > > According to the e-mail thread [1] in April, you have a document about > command format when creating flows on ixgbe NIC. > > I would appreciate your uploading that document to community or could you > just share it with me via an e-mail ?? > > [1] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/2017-April/001786.html > > Thanks, > > Tetsuro > > # re-sending the e-mail because I failed to submit the e-mail to > users@dpdk.org. > > -- > Tetsuro Nakamura <nakamura.tetsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> NTT Network Service > Systems Laboratories > TEL:0422 59 6914(National)/+81 422 59 6914(International) 3-9-11, Midori-Cho > Musashino-Shi, Tokyo 180-8585 Japan > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] using rte_flow via tespmd with Intel X552 2017-08-02 7:28 ` [dpdk-dev] using rte_flow via tespmd with Intel X552 Zhao1, Wei @ 2017-08-02 9:02 ` TETSURO NAKAMURA 2017-08-02 9:15 ` Zhao1, Wei 2017-08-02 13:00 ` Lu, Wenzhuo 1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: TETSURO NAKAMURA @ 2017-08-02 9:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Zhao1, Wei; +Cc: TAKADA Naoki, Satoshi NISHIYAMA, Lu, Wenzhuo, dev Hi Zhao1, Wei - san, I really appreciate your help ! I have no idea where to upload this, but I'm sure it should be uploaded to somewhere public. On 2017/08/02 16:28, Zhao1, Wei wrote: > Hi, NAKAMURA > > I have upload 2 documents about command format when creating flow for NIC igb and ixgbe in the email attachment. > I have decided to commit the context in the doc to doc\guides\nics\ixgbe.rst before, BUT by now it seems the content of the document is too much > To store there. So, is there any other doc more suitable in DPDK to record this. And welcome for any other suggestion. > AND, Wenzhuo, what is your opinion for this? > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: TETSURO NAKAMURA [mailto:nakamura.tetsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp] >> Sent: Wednesday, August 2, 2017 12:22 PM >> To: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zhao1@intel.com> >> Cc: TAKADA Naoki <takada.naoki@lab.ntt.co.jp>; Satoshi NISHIYAMA >> <nishiyama.s@lab.ntt.co.jp>; Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; >> dev@dpdk.org >> Subject: Re: using rte_flow via tespmd with Intel X552 >> >> Wei Zhao - san >> (Cc'ing Wenzhuo - san) >> >> According to the e-mail thread [1] in April, you have a document about >> command format when creating flows on ixgbe NIC. >> >> I would appreciate your uploading that document to community or could you >> just share it with me via an e-mail ?? >> >> [1] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/2017-April/001786.html >> >> Thanks, >> >> Tetsuro >> >> # re-sending the e-mail because I failed to submit the e-mail to >> users@dpdk.org. >> >> -- >> Tetsuro Nakamura <nakamura.tetsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> NTT Network Service >> Systems Laboratories >> TEL:0422 59 6914(National)/+81 422 59 6914(International) 3-9-11, Midori-Cho >> Musashino-Shi, Tokyo 180-8585 Japan >> > -- Tetsuro Nakamura <nakamura.tetsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> NTT Network Service Systems Laboratories TEL:0422 59 6914(National)/+81 422 59 6914(International) 3-9-11, Midori-Cho Musashino-Shi, Tokyo 180-8585 Japan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] using rte_flow via tespmd with Intel X552 2017-08-02 9:02 ` TETSURO NAKAMURA @ 2017-08-02 9:15 ` Zhao1, Wei 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Zhao1, Wei @ 2017-08-02 9:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: TETSURO NAKAMURA; +Cc: TAKADA Naoki, Satoshi NISHIYAMA, Lu, Wenzhuo, dev Hi, NAKAMURA > -----Original Message----- > From: TETSURO NAKAMURA [mailto:nakamura.tetsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp] > Sent: Wednesday, August 2, 2017 5:02 PM > To: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zhao1@intel.com> > Cc: TAKADA Naoki <takada.naoki@lab.ntt.co.jp>; Satoshi NISHIYAMA > <nishiyama.s@lab.ntt.co.jp>; Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; > dev@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: using rte_flow via tespmd with Intel X552 > > Hi Zhao1, Wei - san, > > I really appreciate your help ! > I have no idea where to upload this, > but I'm sure it should be uploaded to somewhere public. > No problem! (●'◡'●) > On 2017/08/02 16:28, Zhao1, Wei wrote: > > Hi, NAKAMURA > > > > I have upload 2 documents about command format when creating flow for > NIC igb and ixgbe in the email attachment. > > I have decided to commit the context in the doc to > > doc\guides\nics\ixgbe.rst before, BUT by now it seems the content of the > document is too much To store there. So, is there any other doc more > suitable in DPDK to record this. And welcome for any other suggestion. > > AND, Wenzhuo, what is your opinion for this? > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: TETSURO NAKAMURA [mailto:nakamura.tetsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp] > >> Sent: Wednesday, August 2, 2017 12:22 PM > >> To: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zhao1@intel.com> > >> Cc: TAKADA Naoki <takada.naoki@lab.ntt.co.jp>; Satoshi NISHIYAMA > >> <nishiyama.s@lab.ntt.co.jp>; Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; > >> dev@dpdk.org > >> Subject: Re: using rte_flow via tespmd with Intel X552 > >> > >> Wei Zhao - san > >> (Cc'ing Wenzhuo - san) > >> > >> According to the e-mail thread [1] in April, you have a document > >> about command format when creating flows on ixgbe NIC. > >> > >> I would appreciate your uploading that document to community or could > >> you just share it with me via an e-mail ?? > >> > >> [1] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/2017-April/001786.html > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Tetsuro > >> > >> # re-sending the e-mail because I failed to submit the e-mail to > >> users@dpdk.org. > >> > >> -- > >> Tetsuro Nakamura <nakamura.tetsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> NTT Network > Service > >> Systems Laboratories > >> TEL:0422 59 6914(National)/+81 422 59 6914(International) 3-9-11, > >> Midori-Cho Musashino-Shi, Tokyo 180-8585 Japan > >> > > > > -- > Tetsuro Nakamura <nakamura.tetsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> NTT Network Service > Systems Laboratories > TEL:0422 59 6914(National)/+81 422 59 6914(International) 3-9-11, Midori-Cho > Musashino-Shi, Tokyo 180-8585 Japan > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] using rte_flow via tespmd with Intel X552 2017-08-02 7:28 ` [dpdk-dev] using rte_flow via tespmd with Intel X552 Zhao1, Wei 2017-08-02 9:02 ` TETSURO NAKAMURA @ 2017-08-02 13:00 ` Lu, Wenzhuo 2017-08-02 13:41 ` Adrien Mazarguil 1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Lu, Wenzhuo @ 2017-08-02 13:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Zhao1, Wei, TETSURO NAKAMURA, Mcnamara, John, Adrien Mazarguil (adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com) Cc: TAKADA Naoki, Satoshi NISHIYAMA, dev Hi, > -----Original Message----- > From: Zhao1, Wei > Sent: Wednesday, August 2, 2017 3:28 AM > To: TETSURO NAKAMURA <nakamura.tetsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> > Cc: TAKADA Naoki <takada.naoki@lab.ntt.co.jp>; Satoshi NISHIYAMA > <nishiyama.s@lab.ntt.co.jp>; Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; > dev@dpdk.org > Subject: RE: using rte_flow via tespmd with Intel X552 > > Hi, NAKAMURA > > I have upload 2 documents about command format when creating flow for > NIC igb and ixgbe in the email attachment. > I have decided to commit the context in the doc to doc\guides\nics\ixgbe.rst > before, BUT by now it seems the content of the document is too much To > store there. So, is there any other doc more suitable in DPDK to record this. > And welcome for any other suggestion. > AND, Wenzhuo, what is your opinion for this? I also have the same feeling that it may make the ixgbe.rst too big. + John and Adrien. Hi John, Adrien, I'm think about creating a specific doc for rte flow, we can include the examples for every NIC here. Is it good? If so, where's the good place to put it? Thanks. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: TETSURO NAKAMURA [mailto:nakamura.tetsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 2, 2017 12:22 PM > > To: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zhao1@intel.com> > > Cc: TAKADA Naoki <takada.naoki@lab.ntt.co.jp>; Satoshi NISHIYAMA > > <nishiyama.s@lab.ntt.co.jp>; Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; > > dev@dpdk.org > > Subject: Re: using rte_flow via tespmd with Intel X552 > > > > Wei Zhao - san > > (Cc'ing Wenzhuo - san) > > > > According to the e-mail thread [1] in April, you have a document about > > command format when creating flows on ixgbe NIC. > > > > I would appreciate your uploading that document to community or could > > you just share it with me via an e-mail ?? > > > > [1] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/2017-April/001786.html > > > > Thanks, > > > > Tetsuro > > > > # re-sending the e-mail because I failed to submit the e-mail to > > users@dpdk.org. > > > > -- > > Tetsuro Nakamura <nakamura.tetsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> NTT Network Service > > Systems Laboratories > > TEL:0422 59 6914(National)/+81 422 59 6914(International) 3-9-11, > > Midori-Cho Musashino-Shi, Tokyo 180-8585 Japan > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] using rte_flow via tespmd with Intel X552 2017-08-02 13:00 ` Lu, Wenzhuo @ 2017-08-02 13:41 ` Adrien Mazarguil 2017-08-07 8:33 ` Zhao1, Wei 2017-08-08 8:57 ` Ferruh Yigit 0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Adrien Mazarguil @ 2017-08-02 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lu, Wenzhuo Cc: Zhao1, Wei, TETSURO NAKAMURA, Mcnamara, John, TAKADA Naoki, Satoshi NISHIYAMA, dev Hi Wenzhuo, On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 01:00:47PM +0000, Lu, Wenzhuo wrote: > Hi, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Zhao1, Wei > > Sent: Wednesday, August 2, 2017 3:28 AM > > To: TETSURO NAKAMURA <nakamura.tetsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> > > Cc: TAKADA Naoki <takada.naoki@lab.ntt.co.jp>; Satoshi NISHIYAMA > > <nishiyama.s@lab.ntt.co.jp>; Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; > > dev@dpdk.org > > Subject: RE: using rte_flow via tespmd with Intel X552 > > > > Hi, NAKAMURA > > > > I have upload 2 documents about command format when creating flow for > > NIC igb and ixgbe in the email attachment. > > I have decided to commit the context in the doc to doc\guides\nics\ixgbe.rst > > before, BUT by now it seems the content of the document is too much To > > store there. So, is there any other doc more suitable in DPDK to record this. > > And welcome for any other suggestion. > > AND, Wenzhuo, what is your opinion for this? > I also have the same feeling that it may make the ixgbe.rst too big. > + John and Adrien. Hi John, Adrien, I'm think about creating a specific doc for rte flow, we can include the examples for every NIC here. Is it good? If so, where's the good place to put it? Thanks. Depends on the kind of examples. Code samples or testpmd flow command? Unless you mean a document that describes individual rte_flow features supported by each NIC? Code samples could be added to a new "Programming flow rules" (or something) section in doc/guide/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst. Another section about NICs could be added in that documentation as well but should only contain a short summary for each of them and a link to the relevant PMD documentation in nics/$PMD.rst (or elsewhere in the DPDK tree), if any. If you want to describe individual rte_flow features supported by each NIC, I think there's no other choice but to create a bunch of doc/guides/nics/features/rte_flow/*.ini files. > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: TETSURO NAKAMURA [mailto:nakamura.tetsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp] > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 2, 2017 12:22 PM > > > To: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zhao1@intel.com> > > > Cc: TAKADA Naoki <takada.naoki@lab.ntt.co.jp>; Satoshi NISHIYAMA > > > <nishiyama.s@lab.ntt.co.jp>; Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; > > > dev@dpdk.org > > > Subject: Re: using rte_flow via tespmd with Intel X552 > > > > > > Wei Zhao - san > > > (Cc'ing Wenzhuo - san) > > > > > > According to the e-mail thread [1] in April, you have a document about > > > command format when creating flows on ixgbe NIC. > > > > > > I would appreciate your uploading that document to community or could > > > you just share it with me via an e-mail ?? > > > > > > [1] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/2017-April/001786.html > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Tetsuro > > > > > > # re-sending the e-mail because I failed to submit the e-mail to > > > users@dpdk.org. > > > > > > -- > > > Tetsuro Nakamura <nakamura.tetsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> NTT Network Service > > > Systems Laboratories > > > TEL:0422 59 6914(National)/+81 422 59 6914(International) 3-9-11, > > > Midori-Cho Musashino-Shi, Tokyo 180-8585 Japan > > > > -- Adrien Mazarguil 6WIND ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] using rte_flow via tespmd with Intel X552 2017-08-02 13:41 ` Adrien Mazarguil @ 2017-08-07 8:33 ` Zhao1, Wei 2017-08-08 8:57 ` Ferruh Yigit 1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Zhao1, Wei @ 2017-08-07 8:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Adrien Mazarguil, Lu, Wenzhuo Cc: TETSURO NAKAMURA, Mcnamara, John, TAKADA Naoki, Satoshi NISHIYAMA, dev Hi, Adrien > -----Original Message----- > From: Adrien Mazarguil [mailto:adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 2, 2017 9:41 PM > To: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com> > Cc: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zhao1@intel.com>; TETSURO NAKAMURA > <nakamura.tetsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>; Mcnamara, John > <john.mcnamara@intel.com>; TAKADA Naoki <takada.naoki@lab.ntt.co.jp>; > Satoshi NISHIYAMA <nishiyama.s@lab.ntt.co.jp>; dev@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: using rte_flow via tespmd with Intel X552 > > Hi Wenzhuo, > > On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 01:00:47PM +0000, Lu, Wenzhuo wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Zhao1, Wei > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 2, 2017 3:28 AM > > > To: TETSURO NAKAMURA <nakamura.tetsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> > > > Cc: TAKADA Naoki <takada.naoki@lab.ntt.co.jp>; Satoshi NISHIYAMA > > > <nishiyama.s@lab.ntt.co.jp>; Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; > > > dev@dpdk.org > > > Subject: RE: using rte_flow via tespmd with Intel X552 > > > > > > Hi, NAKAMURA > > > > > > I have upload 2 documents about command format when creating flow > > > for NIC igb and ixgbe in the email attachment. > > > I have decided to commit the context in the doc to > > > doc\guides\nics\ixgbe.rst before, BUT by now it seems the content of > > > the document is too much To store there. So, is there any other doc more > suitable in DPDK to record this. > > > And welcome for any other suggestion. > > > AND, Wenzhuo, what is your opinion for this? > > I also have the same feeling that it may make the ixgbe.rst too big. > > + John and Adrien. Hi John, Adrien, I'm think about creating a specific doc > for rte flow, we can include the examples for every NIC here. Is it good? If so, > where's the good place to put it? Thanks. > > Depends on the kind of examples. Code samples or testpmd flow command? > Unless you mean a document that describes individual rte_flow features > supported by each NIC? > > Code samples could be added to a new "Programming flow rules" (or > something) section in doc/guide/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst. > > Another section about NICs could be added in that documentation as well > but should only contain a short summary for each of them and a link to the > relevant PMD documentation in nics/$PMD.rst (or elsewhere in the DPDK > tree), if any. > > If you want to describe individual rte_flow features supported by each NIC, I > think there's no other choice but to create a bunch of > doc/guides/nics/features/rte_flow/*.ini files. Your suggestion of create a bunch under > doc/guides/nics/features/rte_flow/*.ini to record these for every type of NIC of igb/ixgbe/i40e, It seems very reasonable, but will DPDK community will agree to such a big change for this a specific feature? Maybe your suggestion of "in doc/guide/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst, add a short summary for each of them and a link to the relevant PMD documentation in nics/$PMD.rst ". and also record to doc\guides\nics\ixgbe.rst will be the only feasible scheme? Although it will be too much to store. Wenzhuo and Adrien, If none of you has no objection to this, I will implement as Adrien's first suggestion. Thank you. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: TETSURO NAKAMURA [mailto:nakamura.tetsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 2, 2017 12:22 PM > > > > To: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zhao1@intel.com> > > > > Cc: TAKADA Naoki <takada.naoki@lab.ntt.co.jp>; Satoshi NISHIYAMA > > > > <nishiyama.s@lab.ntt.co.jp>; Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; > > > > dev@dpdk.org > > > > Subject: Re: using rte_flow via tespmd with Intel X552 > > > > > > > > Wei Zhao - san > > > > (Cc'ing Wenzhuo - san) > > > > > > > > According to the e-mail thread [1] in April, you have a document > > > > about command format when creating flows on ixgbe NIC. > > > > > > > > I would appreciate your uploading that document to community or > > > > could you just share it with me via an e-mail ?? > > > > > > > > [1] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/2017-April/001786.html > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Tetsuro > > > > > > > > # re-sending the e-mail because I failed to submit the e-mail to > > > > users@dpdk.org. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Tetsuro Nakamura <nakamura.tetsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> NTT Network > > > > Service Systems Laboratories > > > > TEL:0422 59 6914(National)/+81 422 59 6914(International) 3-9-11, > > > > Midori-Cho Musashino-Shi, Tokyo 180-8585 Japan > > > > > > > > -- > Adrien Mazarguil > 6WIND ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] using rte_flow via tespmd with Intel X552 2017-08-02 13:41 ` Adrien Mazarguil 2017-08-07 8:33 ` Zhao1, Wei @ 2017-08-08 8:57 ` Ferruh Yigit 2017-08-29 7:26 ` Adrien Mazarguil 1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Ferruh Yigit @ 2017-08-08 8:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Adrien Mazarguil, Lu, Wenzhuo Cc: Zhao1, Wei, TETSURO NAKAMURA, Mcnamara, John, TAKADA Naoki, Satoshi NISHIYAMA, dev On 8/2/2017 2:41 PM, Adrien Mazarguil wrote: > Hi Wenzhuo, > > On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 01:00:47PM +0000, Lu, Wenzhuo wrote: >> Hi, >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Zhao1, Wei >>> Sent: Wednesday, August 2, 2017 3:28 AM >>> To: TETSURO NAKAMURA <nakamura.tetsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> >>> Cc: TAKADA Naoki <takada.naoki@lab.ntt.co.jp>; Satoshi NISHIYAMA >>> <nishiyama.s@lab.ntt.co.jp>; Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; >>> dev@dpdk.org >>> Subject: RE: using rte_flow via tespmd with Intel X552 >>> >>> Hi, NAKAMURA >>> >>> I have upload 2 documents about command format when creating flow for >>> NIC igb and ixgbe in the email attachment. >>> I have decided to commit the context in the doc to doc\guides\nics\ixgbe.rst >>> before, BUT by now it seems the content of the document is too much To >>> store there. So, is there any other doc more suitable in DPDK to record this. >>> And welcome for any other suggestion. >>> AND, Wenzhuo, what is your opinion for this? >> I also have the same feeling that it may make the ixgbe.rst too big. >> + John and Adrien. Hi John, Adrien, I'm think about creating a specific doc for rte flow, we can include the examples for every NIC here. Is it good? If so, where's the good place to put it? Thanks. > > Depends on the kind of examples. Code samples or testpmd flow command? > Unless you mean a document that describes individual rte_flow features > supported by each NIC? > > Code samples could be added to a new "Programming flow rules" (or something) > section in doc/guide/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst. > > Another section about NICs could be added in that documentation as well but > should only contain a short summary for each of them and a link to the > relevant PMD documentation in nics/$PMD.rst (or elsewhere in the DPDK > tree), if any. > > If you want to describe individual rte_flow features supported by each NIC, > I think there's no other choice but to create a bunch of > doc/guides/nics/features/rte_flow/*.ini files. Indeed I was thinking doing a change in .ini files related rte flow in 17.11 rte_flow is a method to implement some filtering features, rte_flow itself is not a device feature. And filtering features already listed in .ini file. So I was thinking removing rte_flow from feature table, and update existing filter features as something like: "Ethertype filter = L" --> Feature exist and implemented using Legacy method. "Ethertype filter = Y" --> Feature exist and implemented using rte flow Does it make sense? > >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: TETSURO NAKAMURA [mailto:nakamura.tetsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp] >>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 2, 2017 12:22 PM >>>> To: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zhao1@intel.com> >>>> Cc: TAKADA Naoki <takada.naoki@lab.ntt.co.jp>; Satoshi NISHIYAMA >>>> <nishiyama.s@lab.ntt.co.jp>; Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; >>>> dev@dpdk.org >>>> Subject: Re: using rte_flow via tespmd with Intel X552 >>>> >>>> Wei Zhao - san >>>> (Cc'ing Wenzhuo - san) >>>> >>>> According to the e-mail thread [1] in April, you have a document about >>>> command format when creating flows on ixgbe NIC. >>>> >>>> I would appreciate your uploading that document to community or could >>>> you just share it with me via an e-mail ?? >>>> >>>> [1] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/2017-April/001786.html >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Tetsuro >>>> >>>> # re-sending the e-mail because I failed to submit the e-mail to >>>> users@dpdk.org. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Tetsuro Nakamura <nakamura.tetsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> NTT Network Service >>>> Systems Laboratories >>>> TEL:0422 59 6914(National)/+81 422 59 6914(International) 3-9-11, >>>> Midori-Cho Musashino-Shi, Tokyo 180-8585 Japan >>>> >> > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] using rte_flow via tespmd with Intel X552 2017-08-08 8:57 ` Ferruh Yigit @ 2017-08-29 7:26 ` Adrien Mazarguil 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Adrien Mazarguil @ 2017-08-29 7:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: Lu, Wenzhuo, Zhao1, Wei, TETSURO NAKAMURA, Mcnamara, John, TAKADA Naoki, Satoshi NISHIYAMA, dev On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 09:57:34AM +0100, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 8/2/2017 2:41 PM, Adrien Mazarguil wrote: > > Hi Wenzhuo, > > > > On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 01:00:47PM +0000, Lu, Wenzhuo wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Zhao1, Wei > >>> Sent: Wednesday, August 2, 2017 3:28 AM > >>> To: TETSURO NAKAMURA <nakamura.tetsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> > >>> Cc: TAKADA Naoki <takada.naoki@lab.ntt.co.jp>; Satoshi NISHIYAMA > >>> <nishiyama.s@lab.ntt.co.jp>; Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; > >>> dev@dpdk.org > >>> Subject: RE: using rte_flow via tespmd with Intel X552 > >>> > >>> Hi, NAKAMURA > >>> > >>> I have upload 2 documents about command format when creating flow for > >>> NIC igb and ixgbe in the email attachment. > >>> I have decided to commit the context in the doc to doc\guides\nics\ixgbe.rst > >>> before, BUT by now it seems the content of the document is too much To > >>> store there. So, is there any other doc more suitable in DPDK to record this. > >>> And welcome for any other suggestion. > >>> AND, Wenzhuo, what is your opinion for this? > >> I also have the same feeling that it may make the ixgbe.rst too big. > >> + John and Adrien. Hi John, Adrien, I'm think about creating a specific doc for rte flow, we can include the examples for every NIC here. Is it good? If so, where's the good place to put it? Thanks. > > > > Depends on the kind of examples. Code samples or testpmd flow command? > > Unless you mean a document that describes individual rte_flow features > > supported by each NIC? > > > > Code samples could be added to a new "Programming flow rules" (or something) > > section in doc/guide/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst. > > > > Another section about NICs could be added in that documentation as well but > > should only contain a short summary for each of them and a link to the > > relevant PMD documentation in nics/$PMD.rst (or elsewhere in the DPDK > > tree), if any. > > > > If you want to describe individual rte_flow features supported by each NIC, > > I think there's no other choice but to create a bunch of > > doc/guides/nics/features/rte_flow/*.ini files. > > Indeed I was thinking doing a change in .ini files related rte flow in 17.11 > > rte_flow is a method to implement some filtering features, rte_flow > itself is not a device feature. And filtering features already listed in > .ini file. > > So I was thinking removing rte_flow from feature table, and update > existing filter features as something like: > "Ethertype filter = L" --> Feature exist and implemented using Legacy > method. > "Ethertype filter = Y" --> Feature exist and implemented using rte flow > > Does it make sense? Yes, I'm fine with that. Detailed information about rte_flow support can be added later to the relevant PMD documentation if necessary then. -- Adrien Mazarguil 6WIND ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-08-29 7:26 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- [not found] <725d0083-decc-1427-c0c1-b8c3515aa429@lab.ntt.co.jp> [not found] ` <42be0cc3-a69b-4e07-be84-41a8deba75cf@lab.ntt.co.jp> 2017-08-02 7:28 ` [dpdk-dev] using rte_flow via tespmd with Intel X552 Zhao1, Wei 2017-08-02 9:02 ` TETSURO NAKAMURA 2017-08-02 9:15 ` Zhao1, Wei 2017-08-02 13:00 ` Lu, Wenzhuo 2017-08-02 13:41 ` Adrien Mazarguil 2017-08-07 8:33 ` Zhao1, Wei 2017-08-08 8:57 ` Ferruh Yigit 2017-08-29 7:26 ` Adrien Mazarguil
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).