From: "Zhao1, Wei" <wei.zhao1@intel.com>
To: "Ye, Xiaolong" <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ixgbe: fix issue for change definitions of bool
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 03:13:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <A2573D2ACFCADC41BB3BE09C6DE313CA0801C929@PGSMSX103.gar.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200227030912.GA20899@intel.com>
Ok,more info will be update to this patch
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ye, Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2020 11:09 AM
> To: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zhao1@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/ixgbe: fix issue for change definitions of bool
>
> Hi,
>
> On 02/27, Wei Zhao wrote:
> >We had better not to change code in base folder, that patch will
> >introduce a bug for etag/etag_strip for x550 NIC. So change back to the
> >aboriginal definition.
> >
> >Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >Fixes: ad43b7bce95b ("net/ixgbe: avoid multiple definitions of bool")
>
> I think this patch makes sense to remove local bool type to avoid possible
> multiple definitions of 'bool', could you try to investigate the root cause of the
> bug that this patch revealed?
>
> Thanks,
> Xiaolong
>
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Wei Zhao <wei.zhao1@intel.com>
> >---
> > drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_osdep.h | 5 ++++-
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_osdep.h
> >b/drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_osdep.h
> >index 844d1701f..19ce2d1c8 100644
> >--- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_osdep.h
> >+++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/base/ixgbe_osdep.h
> >@@ -9,7 +9,6 @@
> > #include <stdint.h>
> > #include <stdio.h>
> > #include <stdarg.h>
> >-#include <stdbool.h>
> > #include <rte_common.h>
> > #include <rte_debug.h>
> > #include <rte_cycles.h>
> >@@ -84,6 +83,10 @@ typedef uint32_t u32;
> > typedef int32_t s32;
> > typedef uint64_t u64;
> >
> >+#ifndef __cplusplus
> >+typedef int bool;
> >+#endif
> >+
> > #define mb() rte_mb()
> > #define wmb() rte_wmb()
> > #define rmb() rte_rmb()
> >--
> >2.17.1
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-27 3:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-26 23:44 Wei Zhao
2020-02-27 1:57 ` Ye Xiaolong
2020-02-27 3:09 ` Ye Xiaolong
2020-02-27 3:13 ` Zhao1, Wei [this message]
2020-03-30 6:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/ixgbe: fix issue for e-tag defination Wei Zhao
2020-03-30 7:37 ` Ye Xiaolong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=A2573D2ACFCADC41BB3BE09C6DE313CA0801C929@PGSMSX103.gar.corp.intel.com \
--to=wei.zhao1@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=xiaolong.ye@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).