From: "Chen, Junjie J" <junjie.j.chen@intel.com>
To: "Tan, Jianfeng" <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>,
"maxime.coquelin@redhat.com" <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
"mtetsuyah@gmail.com" <mtetsuyah@gmail.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/vhost: fix segfault when creating vdev dynamically
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 10:18:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AA85A5A5E706C44BACB0BEFD5AC08BF63138CDFA@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bccc2fd8-867a-266e-7c99-8e5bbd79673e@intel.com>
>
> On 3/27/2018 5:24 PM, Chen, Junjie J wrote:
> >>>> On 3/28/2018 12:05 AM, Junjie Chen wrote:
> >>>>> when creating vdev dynamically, vhost pmd driver start directly
> >>>>> without checking TX/RX queues ready or not, and thus cause
> >>>>> segmentation fault when vhost library accessing queues. This patch
> >>>>> add flag to check whether queues setup or not, and add driver
> >>>>> start call into dev_start to allow user start it after setting up queue.
> >>>> The issue is clear now. But this patch just puts the situation
> >>>> before below
> >> fix:
> >>>> "it doesn't create the actual datagram socket until you call .dev_start()."
> >>> No, if the queue exist, the datagram socket still get created in
> >>> vhost_create
> >> API, since the vhost_driver_register still exist in vhost_create.
> >>
> >> The queue can never be created, as it's still not probed.
> > I think we need to separate this into two cases:
> > Statically create vdev, the datagram recreate logical is still there since
> queues are exist already, this patch doesn't change anything.
> > Dynamic create vdev, as you pointed out, queue can never be created,
> while this should be not valid since In normal process of creating vdev
> dynamically, we always need to config queues. Correct me if I'm wrong.
>
> My point is, either vdev is created statically or dynamically, when probe(),
> queues are not setup yet definitely, then *the unix socket will not be created*
> until we set up the queues and do dev_start(). If the unix socket is not created,
> then VM cannot connect to it.
Yes, I agree this.
In this patch, it just check whether queue is setup or not and give user a chance to setup queue with dev_start, it doesn't revert the logical from previously commit.
So the logical is change to stop creating unix socket before queue setup, what do you think about this?
>
> > In summary, I think the previously commit fixes the static code path and this
> patch fixes the dynamic code path (we need to at least setup queue once).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-27 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-27 16:05 Junjie Chen
2018-03-27 8:56 ` Tan, Jianfeng
2018-03-27 9:02 ` Chen, Junjie J
2018-03-27 9:10 ` Tan, Jianfeng
2018-03-27 9:24 ` Chen, Junjie J
2018-03-27 9:42 ` Tan, Jianfeng
2018-03-27 10:18 ` Chen, Junjie J [this message]
2018-03-27 13:54 ` Tan, Jianfeng
2018-03-27 11:28 ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-03-27 14:01 ` Tan, Jianfeng
2018-03-29 12:35 ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-03-29 15:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Junjie Chen
2018-03-29 13:16 ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-03-30 6:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Junjie Chen
2018-03-30 7:32 ` Yang, Zhiyong
2018-03-30 7:36 ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-03-30 7:35 ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-03-30 7:43 ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-04-09 12:37 ` Jens Freimann
2018-04-10 8:11 ` Chen, Junjie J
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AA85A5A5E706C44BACB0BEFD5AC08BF63138CDFA@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=junjie.j.chen@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jianfeng.tan@intel.com \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=mtetsuyah@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).