DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chen, Junjie J" <junjie.j.chen@intel.com>
To: "Tan, Jianfeng" <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>,
	"maxime.coquelin@redhat.com" <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
	"mtetsuyah@gmail.com" <mtetsuyah@gmail.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/vhost: fix vhost invalid state
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 09:17:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AA85A5A5E706C44BACB0BEFD5AC08BF6313C70F7@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7946ae32-8728-fca3-f5da-61bda57f2289@intel.com>

Hi Jianfeng.

> On 4/11/2018 4:35 PM, Chen, Junjie J wrote:
> >>
> >> On 4/11/2018 6:53 PM, Junjie Chen wrote:
> >>> dev_start sets *dev_attached* after setup queues, this sets device
> >>> to invalid state since no frontend is attached. Also destroy_device
> >>> set
> >>> *started* to zero which makes *allow_queuing* always zero until
> >>> dev_start get called again. Actually, we should not determine queues
> >>> existence by
> >>> *dev_attached* but by queues pointers or other separated variable(s).
> >> I see two issues from your description:
> >>
> >> - We shall fix the wrong use of dev_attached by commit 30a701a53737.
> >> - The allow_queuing is not set correctly. But I doubt if it's a real
> >> issue, as we do update the queue status in dev_start(), dev_stop(),
> >> and new_device(). Can you explain more?
> > The started is set to 0 in destroy_device in 30a701a53737 commit, so
> > allow_queuing is always set to 0 once update_queuing_status get called. We
> have to use "port start" to reset to 1.
> 
> OK, that means it is also due to the wrong use of dev_attached?
Yes, a mixed wrong. That is why I tried to use new variable to track queue. One variable for one state.
> 
> >>> Fixes: 30a701a53737 ("net/vhost: fix crash when creating vdev
> >>> dynamically")
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Junjie Chen <junjie.j.chen@intel.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> Changes in v2:
> >>> - use started to determine vhost queues readiness
> >>> - revert setting started to zero in destroy_device
> >>>    drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c | 61
> >> ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> >>>    1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c
> >> b/drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c
> >>> index 11b6076..ff462b3 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c
> >>> @@ -528,10 +528,13 @@ update_queuing_status(struct rte_eth_dev
> *dev)
> >>>    	unsigned int i;
> >>>    	int allow_queuing = 1;
> >>>
> >>> -	if (rte_atomic32_read(&internal->dev_attached) == 0)
> >>> +	if (!dev->data->rx_queues || !dev->data->tx_queues) {
> >>> +		RTE_LOG(ERR, PMD, "RX/TX queues not exist yet\n");
> >> Even it's not introduced in this patch, but I think we shall not
> >> report error log here.
> > if you attach one port with "port attach" (no vhost queue setup yet),
> > and then execute "port stop", the queue status is not exist yet, right?
> 
> My point is that we allow a dev is not started but attached, so it's not an error,
> and we shall not print error log.
OK, will remove it in V3. 

> 
> >>>    		return;
> >>> +	}
> >>>
> >>> -	if (rte_atomic32_read(&internal->started) == 0)
> >>> +	if (rte_atomic32_read(&internal->started) == 0 ||
> >>> +	    rte_atomic32_read(&internal->dev_attached) == 0)
> >>>    		allow_queuing = 0;
> >>>
> >>>    	/* Wait until rx/tx_pkt_burst stops accessing vhost device */ @@
> >>> -607,13 +610,10 @@ new_device(int vid)
> >>>    #endif
> >>>
> >>>    	internal->vid = vid;
> >>> -	if (eth_dev->data->rx_queues && eth_dev->data->tx_queues) {
> >>> +	if (rte_atomic32_read(&internal->started) == 1)
> >>>    		queue_setup(eth_dev, internal);
> >>> -		rte_atomic32_set(&internal->dev_attached, 1);
> >>> -	} else {
> >>> -		RTE_LOG(INFO, PMD, "RX/TX queues have not setup yet\n");
> >>> -		rte_atomic32_set(&internal->dev_attached, 0);
> >>> -	}
> >>> +	else
> >>> +		RTE_LOG(INFO, PMD, "RX/TX queues not exist yet\n");
> >>>
> >>>    	for (i = 0; i < rte_vhost_get_vring_num(vid); i++)
> >>>    		rte_vhost_enable_guest_notification(vid, i, 0); @@ -622,6
> >>> +622,7 @@ new_device(int vid)
> >>>
> >>>    	eth_dev->data->dev_link.link_status = ETH_LINK_UP;
> >>>
> >>> +	rte_atomic32_set(&internal->dev_attached, 1);
> >>>    	update_queuing_status(eth_dev);
> >>>
> >>>    	RTE_LOG(INFO, PMD, "Vhost device %d created\n", vid); @@
> -651,23
> >>> +652,24 @@ destroy_device(int vid)
> >>>    	eth_dev = list->eth_dev;
> >>>    	internal = eth_dev->data->dev_private;
> >>>
> >>> -	rte_atomic32_set(&internal->started, 0);
> >>> -	update_queuing_status(eth_dev);
> >>>    	rte_atomic32_set(&internal->dev_attached, 0);
> >>> +	update_queuing_status(eth_dev);
> >>>
> >>>    	eth_dev->data->dev_link.link_status = ETH_LINK_DOWN;
> >>>
> >>> -	for (i = 0; i < eth_dev->data->nb_rx_queues; i++) {
> >>> -		vq = eth_dev->data->rx_queues[i];
> >>> -		if (vq == NULL)
> >>> -			continue;
> >>> -		vq->vid = -1;
> >>> -	}
> >>> -	for (i = 0; i < eth_dev->data->nb_tx_queues; i++) {
> >>> -		vq = eth_dev->data->tx_queues[i];
> >>> -		if (vq == NULL)
> >>> -			continue;
> >>> -		vq->vid = -1;
> >>> +	if (eth_dev->data->rx_queues && eth_dev->data->tx_queues) {
> >>> +		for (i = 0; i < eth_dev->data->nb_rx_queues; i++) {
> >>> +			vq = eth_dev->data->rx_queues[i];
> >>> +			if (!vq)
> >>> +				continue;
> >>> +			vq->vid = -1;
> >>> +		}
> >>> +		for (i = 0; i < eth_dev->data->nb_tx_queues; i++) {
> >>> +			vq = eth_dev->data->tx_queues[i];
> >>> +			if (!vq)
> >>> +				continue;
> >>> +			vq->vid = -1;
> >>> +		}
> >>>    	}
> >>>
> >>>    	state = vring_states[eth_dev->data->port_id];
> >>> @@ -792,11 +794,7 @@ eth_dev_start(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev)
> >>>    {
> >>>    	struct pmd_internal *internal = eth_dev->data->dev_private;
> >>>
> >>> -	if (unlikely(rte_atomic32_read(&internal->dev_attached) == 0)) {
> >>> -		queue_setup(eth_dev, internal);
> >>> -		rte_atomic32_set(&internal->dev_attached, 1);
> >>> -	}
> >>> -
> >>> +	queue_setup(eth_dev, internal);
> >>>    	rte_atomic32_set(&internal->started, 1);
> >>>    	update_queuing_status(eth_dev);
> >>>
> >>> @@ -836,10 +834,13 @@ eth_dev_close(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> >>>    	pthread_mutex_unlock(&internal_list_lock);
> >>>    	rte_free(list);
> >>>
> >>> -	for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_rx_queues; i++)
> >>> -		rte_free(dev->data->rx_queues[i]);
> >>> -	for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_tx_queues; i++)
> >>> -		rte_free(dev->data->tx_queues[i]);
> >>> +	if (dev->data->rx_queues)
> >>> +		for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_rx_queues; i++)
> >>> +			rte_free(dev->data->rx_queues[i]);
> >>> +
> >>> +	if (dev->data->tx_queues)
> >>> +		for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_tx_queues; i++)
> >>> +			rte_free(dev->data->tx_queues[i]);
> >>>
> >>>    	rte_free(dev->data->mac_addrs);
> >>>    	free(internal->dev_name);

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-11  9:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-10 14:18 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Junjie Chen
2018-04-10  9:39 ` Tan, Jianfeng
2018-04-10 11:13 ` Jens Freimann
2018-04-11  2:54   ` Chen, Junjie J
2018-04-11 10:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Junjie Chen
2018-04-11  8:11   ` Tan, Jianfeng
2018-04-11  8:35     ` Chen, Junjie J
2018-04-11  9:00       ` Tan, Jianfeng
2018-04-11  9:17         ` Chen, Junjie J [this message]
2018-04-11  9:08   ` Jens Freimann
2018-04-11 17:02   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Junjie Chen
2018-04-12  7:21     ` Tan, Jianfeng
2018-04-12  7:29       ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-04-12  7:34         ` Chen, Junjie J
2018-04-12  7:35           ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-04-12  7:40             ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-04-12  7:36         ` Tan, Jianfeng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AA85A5A5E706C44BACB0BEFD5AC08BF6313C70F7@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=junjie.j.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jianfeng.tan@intel.com \
    --cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=mtetsuyah@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).