From: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@mellanox.com>
To: Bing Zhao <bingz@mellanox.com>, Ori Kam <orika@mellanox.com>,
Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@mellanox.com>
Cc: Matan Azrad <matan@mellanox.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
Jack Min <jackmin@mellanox.com>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix the matching for ICMP fragments
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 14:20:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AM0PR05MB6707E9D95BD193BE5AEC759EC2110@AM0PR05MB6707.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1581948655-2491-1-git-send-email-bingz@mellanox.com>
Hi,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bing Zhao <bingz@mellanox.com>
> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2020 4:11 PM
> To: Ori Kam <orika@mellanox.com>; Slava Ovsiienko
> <viacheslavo@mellanox.com>
> Cc: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@mellanox.com>; Matan Azrad
> <matan@mellanox.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Jack Min
> <jackmin@mellanox.com>; stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix the matching for ICMP fragments
>
> The hardware can recognize and mark the layer 4 protocol type for TCP,
> UDP and IPSec non-fragmented packets. For all the fragmented packets,
> L4 type will be considered as None. This can be used when creating a
> flow with L4 matching, then hops number will be reduced and a better
> performance could be gained.
>
> But for ICMP packets, it cannot be recognized correctly because it is
> not a L4 protocol in the stack, even if the packet format is similar.
>
> All the fragmented and non-fragmented ICMP will have the None L4 type.
> Fragmented packets with incomplete headers could not hit the flow,
> even for the first fragment. Because then it will make it complex to
> defragment for both HW and SW. For other types, the implicit rules
> could be used directly and all the fragments will miss the flow.
>
> For ICMP packets, this should be done explicitly because all packets
> have None type. The first fragment will still hit the flow if there is
> no explicit rule.
>
> All ICMP fragments will still hit the rules like ETH, ETH + IP, and
> ETH + IP + "ICMP protocol" only since they are wildcard rules, and
> there is no next layer protocol specified field in such rules.
>
> Fixes: d53aa89aea91 ("net/mlx5: support matching on ICMP/ICMP6")
> Cc: jackmin@mellanox.com
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Bing Zhao <bingz@mellanox.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
> b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
> index a9bb0b4..0e31c69 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
> @@ -6403,6 +6403,12 @@ struct field_modify_info modify_tcp[] = {
> return;
> if (!icmp6_m)
> icmp6_m = &rte_flow_item_icmp6_mask;
> + /*
> + * Force flow only to match the non-fragmented IPv6 ICMPv6
> packets.
> + * If only the protocol is specified, no need to match the frag.
> + */
> + MLX5_SET(fte_match_set_lyr_2_4, headers_m, frag, 1);
> + MLX5_SET(fte_match_set_lyr_2_4, headers_v, frag, 0);
> MLX5_SET(fte_match_set_misc3, misc3_m, icmpv6_type, icmp6_m-
> >type);
> MLX5_SET(fte_match_set_misc3, misc3_v, icmpv6_type,
> icmp6_v->type & icmp6_m->type);
> @@ -6450,6 +6456,12 @@ struct field_modify_info modify_tcp[] = {
> return;
> if (!icmp_m)
> icmp_m = &rte_flow_item_icmp_mask;
> + /*
> + * Force flow only to match the non-fragmented IPv4 ICMP packets.
> + * If only the protocol is specified, no need to match the frag.
> + */
> + MLX5_SET(fte_match_set_lyr_2_4, headers_m, frag, 1);
> + MLX5_SET(fte_match_set_lyr_2_4, headers_v, frag, 0);
> MLX5_SET(fte_match_set_misc3, misc3_m, icmp_type,
> icmp_m->hdr.icmp_type);
> MLX5_SET(fte_match_set_misc3, misc3_v, icmp_type,
> --
> 1.8.3.1
Patch applied to next-net-mlx,
Kindest regards,
Raslan Darawsheh
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-18 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-17 14:10 Bing Zhao
2020-02-18 9:05 ` Ori Kam
2020-02-18 14:20 ` Raslan Darawsheh [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AM0PR05MB6707E9D95BD193BE5AEC759EC2110@AM0PR05MB6707.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com \
--to=rasland@mellanox.com \
--cc=bingz@mellanox.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jackmin@mellanox.com \
--cc=matan@mellanox.com \
--cc=orika@mellanox.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=viacheslavo@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).