From: "Tone Zhang (Arm Technology China)" <Tone.Zhang@arm.com>
To: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)" <Gavin.Hu@arm.com>,
Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@arm.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] pci_vfio: Support 64KB kernel page_size with vfio-pci driver
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 02:34:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AM0PR08MB34094D67C6DD620DB9B455A18FDD0@AM0PR08MB3409.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR08MB3409F30EF4AB36BEBAF7F3C48FDC0@AM0PR08MB3409.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Anatoly,
I have some comments.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tone Zhang (Arm Technology China)
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 8:49 AM
> To: Burakov, Anatoly <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China) <Gavin.Hu@arm.com>; Honnappa
> Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>; Steve Capper
> <Steve.Capper@arm.com>; nd <nd@arm.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] pci_vfio: Support 64KB kernel page_size with vfio-pci
> driver
>
> Hi Anatoly,
>
> Sorry for the late response.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Burakov, Anatoly <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
> > Sent: Friday, November 9, 2018 8:15 PM
> > To: Tone Zhang (Arm Technology China) <Tone.Zhang@arm.com>;
> > dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China) <Gavin.Hu@arm.com>; Honnappa
> > Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>; Steve Capper
> > <Steve.Capper@arm.com>; nd <nd@arm.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pci_vfio: Support 64KB kernel page_size with
> > vfio-pci driver
> >
> > On 09-Nov-18 5:57 AM, tone.zhang wrote:
> > > With a larger PAGE_SIZE it is possible for the MSI table to very
> > > close to the end of the BAR s.t. when we align the start and end of
> > > the MSI table to the PAGE_SIZE, the end offset of the MSI table is
> > > out of the PCI BAR boundary.
> > >
> > > This patch addresses the issue by comparing both the start and the
> > > end offset of the MSI table with the BAR size, and skip the mapping
> > > if it is out of Bar scope.
> > >
> > > The patch fixes the debug log as below:
> > > EAL: Skipping BAR0
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: tone.zhang <tone.zhang@arm.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <Gavin.Hu@arm.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@arm.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Burakov Anatoly <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
> >
> > In the future, please don't include my Reviewed tag unless i actually
> > sent one :)
>
> Thanks a lot! Will keep in mind. 😊
>
> >
> > > ---
> > > drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci_vfio.c | 36
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > --
> > > 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci_vfio.c
> > > b/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci_vfio.c
> > > index 305cc06..9a0affe 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci_vfio.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci_vfio.c
> > > @@ -445,9 +445,11 @@ pci_vfio_mmap_bar(int vfio_dev_fd, struct
> > mapped_pci_resource *vfio_res,
> > > struct pci_msix_table *msix_table = &vfio_res->msix_table;
> > > struct pci_map *bar = &vfio_res->maps[bar_index];
> > >
> > > - if (bar->size == 0)
> > > + if (bar->size == 0) {
> > > /* Skip this BAR */
> > > + RTE_LOG(INFO, EAL, "Skipping BAR%d\n", bar_index);
> > > return 0;
> > > + }
> > >
> > > if (msix_table->bar_index == bar_index) {
> > > /*
> > > @@ -456,8 +458,22 @@ pci_vfio_mmap_bar(int vfio_dev_fd, struct
> > mapped_pci_resource *vfio_res,
> > > */
> > > uint32_t table_start = msix_table->offset;
> > > uint32_t table_end = table_start + msix_table->size;
> > > - table_end = (table_end + ~PAGE_MASK) & PAGE_MASK;
> > > - table_start &= PAGE_MASK;
> > > + table_end = RTE_ALIGN(table_end, PAGE_SIZE);
> > > + table_start = RTE_ALIGN(table_start, PAGE_SIZE);
> > > + /* after rounding to PAGE_SIZE, it is over the bar->size,
> > > + * fall back to the MSI-X table offset in the bar and
> > > + * align with PAGE_SIZE.
> > > + */
> >
> > Minor nitpick - wording of comment could be better, for example:
> >
> > if page-aligned start of MSI-X table is beyond BAR size, shrink the
> > mapping size to MSI-X table start address.
> >
> > Also, probably needs newline before comment.
> >
>
> Will update the code in next version. Thanks!
>
> > > + if (table_start >= bar->size) {
> > > + table_start = RTE_ALIGN_FLOOR(msix_table->offset,
> > > + PAGE_SIZE);
> > > + /* after aligning with PAGE_SIZE, if it is less than
> > > + * the MSI-X table offset, continue falling back to
> > > + * the actual MSI-X table offset in the bar.
> > > + */
> >
> > Same here, wording could probably be improved. Suggested rewording:
> >
> > If MSI-X table address, floor-aligned by page size, is lower than
> > actual MSI-X table offset, fall back to using MSI-X table offset as table start.
> >
> > Now that i think of it, this could really be expressed like this:
> >
> > uint32_t aligned = RTE_ALIGN_FLOOR(msix_table->offset, PAGE_SIZE);
> > table_start = RTE_MAX(aligned, msix_table_offset);
> >
> > I believe this would be much clearer.
> >
>
> Will update the patch.
>
When enter the judgement, it implies the "msix_table->offset" is NOT page size aligned, I think we can replace the code in the judgement with one line: table_start = msix_table->offset;
It looks more simple. What's your opinion? Thanks!
> > > + if (table_start < msix_table->offset)
> > > + table_start = msix_table->offset;
> > > + }
> > >
> > > if (table_start == 0 && table_end >= bar->size) {
> > > /* Cannot map this BAR */
> > > @@ -469,8 +485,18 @@ pci_vfio_mmap_bar(int vfio_dev_fd, struct
> > > mapped_pci_resource *vfio_res,
> > >
> > > memreg[0].offset = bar->offset;
> > > memreg[0].size = table_start;
> > > - memreg[1].offset = bar->offset + table_end;
> > > - memreg[1].size = bar->size - table_end;
> > > + if (bar->size < table_end) {
> > > + /*
> > > + * after rounding to PAGE_SIZE we don't have any space
> > > + * left after the MSI table, so don't try and map it.
> > > + */
> >
> > Suggested rewording:
> >
> > If MSI-X table end is beyond BAR end, don't attempt to perform second
> mapping.
> >
>
> Thanks a lot. Will update.
>
> > > + memreg[1].offset = 0;
> > > + memreg[1].size = 0;
> > > + }
> > > + else {
> > > + memreg[1].offset = bar->offset + table_end;
> > > + memreg[1].size = bar->size - table_end;
> > > + }
> > >
> > > RTE_LOG(DEBUG, EAL,
> > > "Trying to map BAR%d that contains the MSI-X "
> > >
> >
> > However, the patch can go in as is if needed, so
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
> >
>
> Thanks! 😉
>
> > --
> > Thanks,
> > Anatoly
>
> Br,
> Tone
Br,
Tone
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-16 2:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-24 2:20 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " tone.zhang
2018-10-24 9:09 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-11-01 2:33 ` Tone Zhang (Arm Technology China)
2018-11-01 10:01 ` Burakov, Anatoly
[not found] ` <DB7PR08MB33859242951014EF340C897AE9C80@DB7PR08MB3385.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
2018-11-03 5:46 ` Tone Zhang (Arm Technology China)
2018-11-06 11:03 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-11-07 4:55 ` Tone Zhang (Arm Technology China)
2018-11-07 10:12 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-11-08 0:45 ` Tone Zhang (Arm Technology China)
2018-11-09 5:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " tone.zhang
2018-11-09 12:15 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-11-15 0:49 ` Tone Zhang (Arm Technology China)
2018-11-16 2:34 ` Tone Zhang (Arm Technology China) [this message]
2018-11-16 10:36 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-11-19 2:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " tone.zhang
2018-12-03 7:25 ` Tone Zhang (Arm Technology China)
2018-12-10 11:40 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-12-10 11:45 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-12-10 15:55 ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-12-12 10:49 ` Tone Zhang (Arm Technology China)
2018-12-12 10:48 ` Tone Zhang (Arm Technology China)
2018-12-12 11:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " tone.zhang
2018-12-12 11:27 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-12-19 23:05 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AM0PR08MB34094D67C6DD620DB9B455A18FDD0@AM0PR08MB3409.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
--to=tone.zhang@arm.com \
--cc=Gavin.Hu@arm.com \
--cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=Steve.Capper@arm.com \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).