DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage <wathsala.vithanage@arm.com>
To: "Mattias Rönnblom" <hofors@lysator.liu.se>,
	"Shunzhi Wen" <Shunzhi.Wen@arm.com>,
	"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	"Mattias Rönnblom" <mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com>,
	"Ruifeng Wang" <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>,
	"Bruce Richardson" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	"Tyler Retzlaff" <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>,
	"Min Zhou" <zhoumin@loongson.cn>,
	"David Christensen" <drc@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Stanislaw Kardach" <stanislaw.kardach@gmail.com>,
	"Konstantin Ananyev" <konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
	Jack Bond-Preston <Jack.Bond-Preston@arm.com>,
	Dhruv Tripathi <Dhruv.Tripathi@arm.com>,
	Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
	nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] eal: add support for TRNG with Arm RNG feature
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 06:34:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AM0PR08MB5073BFA5D3C903606F272A1E9FB72@AM0PR08MB5073.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <298cc5e7-bb47-46a9-a904-c583edff7daa@lysator.liu.se>

> ...to have a non-zero chance of getting accepted.
> 

I see too much uncertainty in that statement with "non-zero chance". As the maintainer
of this library and someone with the community's best interest in mind, can you outline
the requirements for a rte_csrand implementation with a higher degree of confidence?

I want to know the criteria that must be satisfied for the acceptance probability to be
close to 1. I'm sorry if I have not been abundantly clear on the requirements that I thought
you would look for in such a patch. Maybe I misread your previous email.

> 
> That's circular. "The reason we want this feature implementation to be
> included is to satisfy those who want this feature implementation."
> 
> Stop thinking like an ARM developer on a "software enablement" mission, and
> start thinking like a DPDK library or application developer.

We all think different in one way or the other, but what's more important is finding a
common ground.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-07-29  6:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-23 21:27 Shunzhi Wen
2024-07-24  6:40 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-07-24 14:35   ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-07-24 15:07     ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-07-24 16:16       ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-07-24 19:14         ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-07-24 20:02           ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-07-25  4:48             ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-07-25 14:56               ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-07-26 18:34   ` Shunzhi Wen
2024-07-26 19:00     ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-07-26 20:12       ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
2024-07-26 22:33     ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-07-27 15:45       ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
2024-07-27 15:54         ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-07-27 22:27           ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
2024-07-27 23:55             ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-07-28  6:46               ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-07-29  4:48               ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
2024-07-27 17:07         ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-07-27 22:45           ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
2024-07-28  6:42             ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-07-28 15:52               ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-07-29  4:34                 ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
2024-07-29  6:34               ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage [this message]
2024-07-29  6:47                 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-07-29 18:16                   ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
2024-07-29 18:31                     ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-07-29 19:11                     ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-07-29 19:30                       ` Morten Brørup

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AM0PR08MB5073BFA5D3C903606F272A1E9FB72@AM0PR08MB5073.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=wathsala.vithanage@arm.com \
    --cc=Dhruv.Tripathi@arm.com \
    --cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=Jack.Bond-Preston@arm.com \
    --cc=Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com \
    --cc=Shunzhi.Wen@arm.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=drc@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hofors@lysator.liu.se \
    --cc=konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru \
    --cc=mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=stanislaw.kardach@gmail.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=zhoumin@loongson.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).