DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>
To: "jerinj@marvell.com" <jerinj@marvell.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	 "thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>,
	Declan Doherty <declan.doherty@intel.com>,
	"jerinj@marvell.com" <jerinj@marvell.com>,
	Jan Viktorin <viktorin@rehivetech.com>,
	Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	Ray Kinsella <mdr@ashroe.eu>,
	Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com>,
	Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>,
	Radha Mohan Chintakuntla <radhac@marvell.com>,
	Veerasenareddy Burru <vburru@marvell.com>,
	Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>,
	Nithin Dabilpuram <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>,
	Kiran Kumar K <kirankumark@marvell.com>,
	Sunil Kumar Kori <skori@marvell.com>,
	Satha Rao <skoteshwar@marvell.com>,
	Nalla Pradeep <pnalla@marvell.com>,
	Ciara Power <ciara.power@intel.com>,
	Shijith Thotton <sthotton@marvell.com>,
	Ashwin Sekhar T K <asekhar@marvell.com>,
	Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Cc: "david.marchand@redhat.com" <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
	"ferruh.yigit@intel.com" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 5/5] drivers: remove octeontx2 drivers
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 08:57:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AS8PR08MB7080ED025560ADEC85E4B6299E759@AS8PR08MB7080.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211211090435.2889574-6-jerinj@marvell.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: jerinj@marvell.com <jerinj@marvell.com>
> Sent: Saturday, December 11, 2021 5:05 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org; thomas@monjalon.net; Akhil Goyal
> <gakhil@marvell.com>; Declan Doherty <declan.doherty@intel.com>;
> jerinj@marvell.com; Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>; Jan Viktorin
> <viktorin@rehivetech.com>; Bruce Richardson
> <bruce.richardson@intel.com>; Ray Kinsella <mdr@ashroe.eu>; Ankur
> Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com>; Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>;
> Radha Mohan Chintakuntla <radhac@marvell.com>; Veerasenareddy Burru
> <vburru@marvell.com>; Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>;
> Nithin Dabilpuram <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>; Kiran Kumar K
> <kirankumark@marvell.com>; Sunil Kumar Kori <skori@marvell.com>; Satha
> Rao <skoteshwar@marvell.com>; Nalla Pradeep <pnalla@marvell.com>;
> Ciara Power <ciara.power@intel.com>; Shijith Thotton
> <sthotton@marvell.com>; Ashwin Sekhar T K <asekhar@marvell.com>;
> Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
> Cc: david.marchand@redhat.com; ferruh.yigit@intel.com
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 5/5] drivers: remove octeontx2 drivers
> 
> From: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>
> 
> As per the deprecation notice,  In the view of enabling unified driver
> for octeontx2(cn9k)/octeontx3(cn10k), removing drivers/octeontx2
> drivers and replace with drivers/cnxk/ which
> supports both octeontx2(cn9k) and octeontx3(cn10k) SoCs.
> 
> This patch does the following
> 
> - Replace drivers/common/octeontx2/ with drivers/common/cnxk/
> - Replace drivers/mempool/octeontx2/ with drivers/mempool/cnxk/
> - Replace drivers/net/octeontx2/ with drivers/net/cnxk/
> - Replace drivers/event/octeontx2/ with drivers/event/cnxk/
> - Replace drivers/crypto/octeontx2/ with drivers/crypto/cnxk/
> - Rename config/arm/arm64_octeontx2_linux_gcc as
>   config/arm/arm64_cn9k_linux_gcc
> - Update the documentation and MAINTAINERS to reflect the same.
> - Change the reference to OCTEONTX2 as OCTEON 9. Old release notes and
> the kernel related documentation is not accounted for this change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>
> Acked-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
> ---
>  MAINTAINERS                                   |   37 -
>  app/test/meson.build                          |    1 -
>  app/test/test_cryptodev.c                     |    7 -
>  app/test/test_cryptodev.h                     |    1 -
>  app/test/test_cryptodev_asym.c                |   17 -
>  app/test/test_eventdev.c                      |    8 -
>  config/arm/arm64_cn10k_linux_gcc              |    1 -
>  ...teontx2_linux_gcc => arm64_cn9k_linux_gcc} |    3 +-
>  config/arm/meson.build                        |   10 +-

For Arm configuration part:
Acked-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>


  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-14  8:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-03  6:23 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] common/cnxk: add REE support lironh
2021-10-28  9:30 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-11-23 19:13 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] regex/cn9k: use cnxk infrastructure lironh
2021-11-23 19:13   ` [PATCH v2 1/5] common/cnxk: add REE HW definitions lironh
2021-11-23 19:13   ` [PATCH v2 2/5] common/cnxk: add REE mbox definitions lironh
2021-11-23 19:13   ` [PATCH v2 3/5] common/cnxk: add REE support lironh
2021-11-23 19:13   ` [PATCH v2 4/5] common/cnxk: link REE support to ROC files lironh
2021-11-23 19:13   ` [PATCH v2 5/5] regex/cn9k: use cnxk infrastructure lironh
     [not found]     ` <20211123193835.20601-1-robot@bytheb.org>
2021-11-28 20:17       ` [EXT] |FAILURE| pw104631 " Liron Himi
2021-11-28 20:37         ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-11-29  9:55           ` Liron Himi
2021-11-29 10:10             ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-11-29 19:47   ` [PATCH v2 0/5] " lironh
2021-11-29 19:47     ` [PATCH v3 " lironh
2021-11-29 19:47     ` [PATCH v3 1/5] common/cnxk: add REE HW definitions lironh
2021-12-07 18:31       ` [PATCH v4 0/4] regex/cn9k: use cnxk infrastructure lironh
2021-12-07 18:31         ` [PATCH v4 1/4] common/cnxk: add REE HW definitions lironh
2021-12-07 18:31         ` [PATCH v4 2/4] common/cnxk: add REE mbox definitions lironh
2021-12-07 18:31         ` [PATCH v4 3/4] common/cnxk: add REE support lironh
2021-12-07 18:31         ` [PATCH v4 4/4] regex/cn9k: use cnxk infrastructure lironh
2021-12-08  9:14         ` [PATCH v4 0/4] " Jerin Jacob
2021-12-11  9:04         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/5] remove octeontx2 drivers jerinj
2021-12-11  9:04           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/5] common/cnxk: add REE HW definitions jerinj
2021-12-11  9:04           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/5] common/cnxk: add REE mbox definitions jerinj
2021-12-11  9:04           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/5] common/cnxk: add REE support jerinj
2021-12-11  9:04           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/5] regex/cn9k: use cnxk infrastructure jerinj
2021-12-11  9:04           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 5/5] drivers: remove octeontx2 drivers jerinj
2021-12-14  8:57             ` Ruifeng Wang [this message]
2022-01-12 14:37           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/5] " Thomas Monjalon
2021-11-29 19:47     ` [PATCH v3 2/5] common/cnxk: add REE mbox definitions lironh
2021-11-29 19:47     ` [PATCH v3 3/5] common/cnxk: add REE support lironh
2021-11-29 19:47     ` [PATCH v3 4/5] common/cnxk: link REE support to ROC files lironh
2021-11-29 19:47     ` [PATCH v3 5/5] regex/cn9k: use cnxk infrastructure lironh
2021-11-29 19:49   ` [PATCH v3 0/5] " lironh
2021-11-29 19:49     ` [PATCH v3 1/5] common/cnxk: add REE HW definitions lironh
2021-11-29 19:49     ` [PATCH v3 2/5] common/cnxk: add REE mbox definitions lironh
2021-11-29 19:49     ` [PATCH v3 3/5] common/cnxk: add REE support lironh
2021-11-29 19:49     ` [PATCH v3 4/5] common/cnxk: link REE support to ROC files lironh
2021-11-29 19:49     ` [PATCH v3 5/5] regex/cn9k: use cnxk infrastructure lironh
2021-11-29 19:59   ` [PATCH v3 0/5] " lironh
2021-11-29 19:59     ` [PATCH v3 1/5] common/cnxk: add REE HW definitions lironh
2021-11-29 19:59     ` [PATCH v3 2/5] common/cnxk: add REE mbox definitions lironh
2021-11-29 19:59     ` [PATCH v3 3/5] common/cnxk: add REE support lironh
2021-11-29 19:59     ` [PATCH v3 4/5] common/cnxk: link REE support to ROC files lironh
2021-12-06  5:07       ` Jerin Jacob
2021-12-06  6:54         ` [EXT] " Liron Himi
2021-12-06  8:08           ` Jerin Jacob
2021-11-29 19:59     ` [PATCH v3 5/5] regex/cn9k: use cnxk infrastructure lironh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AS8PR08MB7080ED025560ADEC85E4B6299E759@AS8PR08MB7080.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
    --cc=adwivedi@marvell.com \
    --cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
    --cc=asekhar@marvell.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=ciara.power@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=gakhil@marvell.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=kirankumark@marvell.com \
    --cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=ndabilpuram@marvell.com \
    --cc=pbhagavatula@marvell.com \
    --cc=pnalla@marvell.com \
    --cc=radhac@marvell.com \
    --cc=skori@marvell.com \
    --cc=skoteshwar@marvell.com \
    --cc=sthotton@marvell.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=vburru@marvell.com \
    --cc=viktorin@rehivetech.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).