From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39DD05595 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:07:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Mar 2016 04:07:57 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,344,1455004800"; d="scan'208";a="938325149" Received: from irsmsx102.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.155]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Mar 2016 04:07:56 -0700 Received: from irsmsx103.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.3.239]) by IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.19]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:07:54 +0000 From: "Mcnamara, John" To: Thomas Monjalon , "Yigit, Ferruh" CC: "dev@dpdk.org" , Panu Matilainen , David Marchand , "Zhang, Helin" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] slow data path communication between DPDK port and Linux Thread-Index: AQHRf3FI7X4V8seHcEykzlA5qTJk4p9b5e4Q Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:07:54 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1455858349-14639-1-git-send-email-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> <56E917AD.2060701@redhat.com> <56E934E5.4080905@intel.com> <2637434.UE2LQEG9YB@xps13> In-Reply-To: <2637434.UE2LQEG9YB@xps13> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ctpclassification: CTP_IC x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiMWJiYTI0ZDgtYzI5Ni00MzEzLWJkNDctOWQ5MDQ4M2Y3YzIyIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX0lDIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE1LjkuNi42IiwiVHJ1c3RlZExhYmVsSGFzaCI6IkJaNUhlK2dTQjlRSExJdmg3TnN4U0ZCeWtJYTFNMWJmam8zUzZQTzF2d009In0= x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.182] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] slow data path communication between DPDK port and Linux X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:07:57 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon > Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 10:46 AM > To: Yigit, Ferruh > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Panu Matilainen ; David > Marchand ; Zhang, Helin > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] slow data path communication > between DPDK port and Linux > > > > We can't remove it. >=20 > Why? There are a lot of people using KNI. > > We can't replace/improve it -you were one of the major opposition to th= is. > > This doesn't leave more option other than using it. >=20 > Why cannot we replace it by something upstream? In theory it could be upstreamed. Let's see how we get on with upstreaming = the KCP component first. John