Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: fix some typos in prog_guide

["Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Xingyou Chen [mailto:niatlantice@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 8, 2017 3:09 AM
> To: Mcnamara, John <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Xingyou Chen <niatlantice@gmail.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] doc: fix some typos in prog_guide
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xingyou Chen <niatlantice@gmail.com>
> ---
>  doc/guides/prog_guide/perf_opt_guidelines.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/perf_opt_guidelines.rst
> b/doc/guides/prog_guide/perf_opt_guidelines.rst
> index 7c24aa485..286bf9837 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/perf_opt_guidelines.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/perf_opt_guidelines.rst
> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ Performance Optimization Guidelines  Introduction
>  ------------
> 
> -The following sections describe optimizations used in the DPDK and
> optimizations that should be considered for a new applications.
> +The following sections describe optimizations used in DPDK and
> optimizations that should be considered for new applications.
> 
>  They also highlight the performance-impacting coding techniques that
> should,  and should not be, used when developing an application using the
> DPDK.

Just to note on the first typo that "the DPDK" is actually
correct and the original documentation was written like that and
some people say it that way. In that usage I think the definite
article is being associated with the "Kit" part of the spelled
out acronym. However, in practice many people now use DPDK as a
proper noun and omit the definite article. Either way is fine
with me.

Acked-by: John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>