Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: update ABI/API policy

["Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richardson, Bruce
> Sent: Monday, November 6, 2017 11:28 AM
> To: Mcnamara, John <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] doc: update ABI/API policy
> 
> Following agreement at the DPDK Technical Board meeting of 2017-10-13 [1],
> update the documentation with the ABI/API policy changes.
> 
> [1] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-October/079961.html
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> ---
>  doc/guides/contributing/versioning.rst | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/doc/guides/contributing/versioning.rst
> b/doc/guides/contributing/versioning.rst
> index 8d0fdb777..a1d8492a1 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/contributing/versioning.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/contributing/versioning.rst
> @@ -13,7 +13,9 @@ General Guidelines
>  ------------------
> 
>  #. Whenever possible, ABI should be preserved -#. The libraries marked in
> experimental state may change without constraint.
> +#. Libraries or APIs marked in ``experimental`` state may change without
> constraint.
> +#. New API will be marked as ``experimental`` for at least one release to

s/API/APIs/


> +APIs marked as ``experimental`` are not considered part of the ABI and
> +may change without warning at any time.  Since changes to APIs are most
> +likely immediately after their introduction, as users begin to take
> +advantage of those new API and start finding issues with them, new DPDK

s/API/APIs/


> +   - The acknowledgment of the maintainer of the component is mandatory, or if
> +     no maintainer is available for the component, the tree/sub-tree maintainer
> +     for that component must be acknowledge the ABI change instead.

s/must be/must/

Apart from that:

Acked-by: John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>