From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE6A15934
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 15:14:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18])
 by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Jul 2015 06:14:44 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,446,1432623600"; d="scan'208";a="726433017"
Received: from irsmsx153.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.192.75])
 by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Jul 2015 06:14:43 -0700
Received: from irsmsx103.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.3.216]) by
 IRSMSX153.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.9.140]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002;
 Fri, 10 Jul 2015 14:14:43 +0100
From: "Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
To: "Sanford, Robert" <rsanford@akamai.com>, "Richardson, Bruce"
 <bruce.richardson@intel.com>, Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>,
 "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Thread-Topic: Ethernet API - multiple post-RX-burst callbacks' run-order is
 opposite to their add-order
Thread-Index: AQHQtQq6522JRvZBpUKYMH/FZfH73Z3UuZCQ
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 13:14:41 +0000
Message-ID: <B27915DBBA3421428155699D51E4CFE2F6A381@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com>
References: <D1BB0052.A7DB%rsanford@akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <D1BB0052.A7DB%rsanford@akamai.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.181]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Ethernet API - multiple post-RX-burst callbacks'
 run-order is opposite to their add-order
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 13:14:46 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Sanford, Robert
> Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2015 10:05 PM
> To: Richardson, Bruce; Thomas Monjalon; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] Ethernet API - multiple post-RX-burst callbacks' run-
> order is opposite to their add-order
>=20
> When one adds multiple post-RX-burst callbacks to a queue, their executio=
n
> order is the opposite of the order in which they are added.

Hi,

I think you are right and that the current order of execution for callbacks=
 is counter-intuitive.

I've submitted a patch to fix the order:

    http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/6300/

If the patch is accepted I'll add a note to the release notes also.

John.
--=20