From: "Wang, Xiao W" <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>
To: "Singh, Jasvinder" <jasvinder.singh@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"Dumitrescu, Cristian" <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/softnic: fix pipeline time calculation
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2019 10:46:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <B7F2E978279D1D49A3034B7786DACF407AF322CD@SHSMSX106.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54CBAA185211B4429112C315DA58FF6D3FD15433@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Singh, Jasvinder
> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 10:46 PM
> To: Wang, Xiao W <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Dumitrescu, Cristian <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>;
> stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] net/softnic: fix pipeline time calculation
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wang, Xiao W
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2019 2:59 PM
> > To: Singh, Jasvinder <jasvinder.singh@intel.com>
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Dumitrescu, Cristian <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>;
> > Wang, Xiao W <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>; stable@dpdk.org
> > Subject: [PATCH] net/softnic: fix pipeline time calculation
> >
> > When a new pipeline is added to a thread, the "time_next_min" value may
> > need update, otherwise this pipeline won't get served timely.
> >
> > Fixes: 70709c78fda6 ("net/softnic: add command to enable/disable pipeline")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xiao Wang <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/softnic/rte_eth_softnic_thread.c | 6 ++++++
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/softnic/rte_eth_softnic_thread.c
> > b/drivers/net/softnic/rte_eth_softnic_thread.c
> > index 855408e98..2b482117d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/softnic/rte_eth_softnic_thread.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/softnic/rte_eth_softnic_thread.c
> > @@ -337,6 +337,9 @@ softnic_thread_pipeline_enable(struct
> pmd_internals
> > *softnic,
> > tdp->timer_period = (rte_get_tsc_hz() * p->timer_period_ms)
> /
> > 1000;
> > tdp->time_next = rte_get_tsc_cycles() + tdp->timer_period;
> >
> > + if (tdp->time_next < td->time_next_min)
> > + td->time_next_min = tdp->time_next;
> > +
> > td->n_pipelines++;
> >
> > /* Pipeline */
> > @@ -522,6 +525,9 @@ thread_msg_handle_pipeline_enable(struct
> > softnic_thread_data *t,
> > (rte_get_tsc_hz() * req->pipeline_enable.timer_period_ms) /
> > 1000;
> > p->time_next = rte_get_tsc_cycles() + p->timer_period;
> >
> > + if (p->time_next < t->time_next_min)
> > + t->time_next_min = p->time_next;
> > +
> > t->n_pipelines++;
> >
> > /* Response */
> > --
> > 2.15.1
>
>
> Hi Wang,
>
> Timer values for pipelines and thread level message handlers are already
> adjusted in runtime function rte_pmd_softnic_run_internal(). In runtime
> function, the values of t->time_next_min is updated as well. IMO, above
> changes not needed. Could you help with the case where timer adjustments in
> runtime not working?
Hi Jasvinder,
the values of t->time_next_min is updated only when the pipeline message and thread message get handled, but not when the pipeline is added to that thread. E.g. when a thread t->time_next_min is ~100ms later, and a new pipeline is added to that thread with timer_period_ms parameter set to 10ms, then this pipeline's control message will not be served until 100ms later.
BRs,
Xiao
>
> Thanks,
> Jasvinder
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-02 10:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-15 13:59 Xiao Wang
2019-05-15 13:59 ` Xiao Wang
2019-05-31 14:45 ` Singh, Jasvinder
2019-06-02 10:46 ` Wang, Xiao W [this message]
2019-06-04 9:27 ` Singh, Jasvinder
2019-07-09 10:32 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2019-07-09 14:00 ` Wang, Xiao W
2019-07-09 14:18 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=B7F2E978279D1D49A3034B7786DACF407AF322CD@SHSMSX106.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=xiao.w.wang@intel.com \
--cc=cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jasvinder.singh@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).