From: "Mo, YufengX" <yufengx.mo@intel.com>
To: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "drc@ibm.com" <drc@ibm.com>,
"pradeep@us.ibm.com" <pradeep@us.ibm.com>,
Takeshi Yoshimura <tyos@jp.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vfio: fix expanding DMA area in ppc64le
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 02:39:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <B8B15C44A3F2C044966E545C7B7371153E7FDFC2@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190613022239.6946-1-tyos@jp.ibm.com>
Sorry, missed send this mail. Ignore it pls.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mo, YufengX
> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2019 10:38 AM
> To: Mo, YufengX <yufengx.mo@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: drc@ibm.com; pradeep@us.ibm.com; Takeshi Yoshimura <tyos@jp.ibm.com>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vfio: fix expanding DMA area in ppc64le
>
> From: Takeshi Yoshimura <tyos@jp.ibm.com>
>
> In ppc64le, expanding DMA areas always fail because we cannot remove
> a DMA window. As a result, we cannot allocate more than one memseg in
> ppc64le. This is because vfio_spapr_dma_mem_map() doesn't unmap all
> the mapped DMA before removing the window. This patch fixes this
> incorrect behavior.
>
> I added a global variable to track current window size since we do
> not have better ways to get exact size of it than doing so. sPAPR
> IOMMU seems not to provide any ways to get window size with ioctl
> interfaces. rte_memseg_walk*() is currently used to calculate window
> size, but it walks memsegs that are marked as used, not mapped. So,
> we need to determine if a given memseg is mapped or not, otherwise
> the ioctl reports errors due to attempting to unregister memory
> addresses that are not registered. The global variable is excluded
> in non-ppc64le binaries.
>
> Similar problems happen in user maps. We need to avoid attempting to
> unmap the address that is given as the function's parameter. The
> compaction of user maps prevents us from passing correct length for
> unmapping DMA at the window recreation. So, I removed it in ppc64le.
>
> I also fixed the order of ioctl for unregister and unmap. The ioctl
> for unregister sometimes report device busy errors due to the
> existence of mapped area.
>
> Signed-off-by: Takeshi Yoshimura <tyos@jp.ibm.com>
> ---
> lib/librte_eal/linux/eal/eal_vfio.c | 154 +++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 103 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linux/eal/eal_vfio.c b/lib/librte_eal/linux/eal/eal_vfio.c
> index f16c5c3c0..c1b275b56 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/linux/eal/eal_vfio.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/linux/eal/eal_vfio.c
> @@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ is_null_map(const struct user_mem_map *map)
> return map->addr == 0 && map->iova == 0 && map->len == 0;
> }
>
> +#ifndef RTE_ARCH_PPC_64
> /* we may need to merge user mem maps together in case of user mapping/unmapping
> * chunks of memory, so we'll need a comparator function to sort segments.
> */
> @@ -126,6 +127,7 @@ user_mem_map_cmp(const void *a, const void *b)
>
> return 0;
> }
> +#endif
>
> /* adjust user map entry. this may result in shortening of existing map, or in
> * splitting existing map in two pieces.
> @@ -162,6 +164,7 @@ adjust_map(struct user_mem_map *src, struct user_mem_map *end,
> }
> }
>
> +#ifndef RTE_ARCH_PPC_64
> /* try merging two maps into one, return 1 if succeeded */
> static int
> merge_map(struct user_mem_map *left, struct user_mem_map *right)
> @@ -177,6 +180,7 @@ merge_map(struct user_mem_map *left, struct user_mem_map *right)
>
> return 1;
> }
> +#endif
>
> static struct user_mem_map *
> find_user_mem_map(struct user_mem_maps *user_mem_maps, uint64_t addr,
> @@ -211,6 +215,16 @@ find_user_mem_map(struct user_mem_maps *user_mem_maps, uint64_t addr,
> return NULL;
> }
>
> +#ifdef RTE_ARCH_PPC_64
> +/* Recreation of DMA window requires unregistering DMA memory.
> + * Compaction confuses the logic and causes false reports in the recreation.
> + * For now, we do not compact user maps in ppc64le.
> + */
> +static void
> +compact_user_maps(__rte_unused struct user_mem_maps *user_mem_maps)
> +{
> +}
> +#else
> /* this will sort all user maps, and merge/compact any adjacent maps */
> static void
> compact_user_maps(struct user_mem_maps *user_mem_maps)
> @@ -256,6 +270,7 @@ compact_user_maps(struct user_mem_maps *user_mem_maps)
> user_mem_maps->n_maps = cur_idx;
> }
> }
> +#endif
>
> static int
> vfio_open_group_fd(int iommu_group_num)
> @@ -1306,6 +1321,7 @@ vfio_type1_dma_map(int vfio_container_fd)
> return rte_memseg_walk(type1_map, &vfio_container_fd);
> }
>
> +#ifdef RTE_ARCH_PPC_64
> static int
> vfio_spapr_dma_do_map(int vfio_container_fd, uint64_t vaddr, uint64_t iova,
> uint64_t len, int do_map)
> @@ -1357,14 +1373,6 @@ vfio_spapr_dma_do_map(int vfio_container_fd, uint64_t vaddr, uint64_t iova,
> }
>
> } else {
> - ret = ioctl(vfio_container_fd,
> - VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_UNREGISTER_MEMORY, ®);
> - if (ret) {
> - RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, " cannot unregister vaddr for IOMMU, error %i (%s)\n",
> - errno, strerror(errno));
> - return -1;
> - }
> -
> memset(&dma_unmap, 0, sizeof(dma_unmap));
> dma_unmap.argsz = sizeof(struct vfio_iommu_type1_dma_unmap);
> dma_unmap.size = len;
> @@ -1377,24 +1385,50 @@ vfio_spapr_dma_do_map(int vfio_container_fd, uint64_t vaddr, uint64_t iova,
> errno, strerror(errno));
> return -1;
> }
> +
> + ret = ioctl(vfio_container_fd,
> + VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_UNREGISTER_MEMORY, ®);
> + if (ret) {
> + RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, " cannot unregister vaddr for IOMMU, error %i (%s)\n",
> + errno, strerror(errno));
> + return -1;
> + }
> }
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> +struct spapr_remap_walk_param {
> + int vfio_container_fd;
> + uint64_t window_size;
> +};
> +
> static int
> vfio_spapr_map_walk(const struct rte_memseg_list *msl,
> const struct rte_memseg *ms, void *arg)
> {
> - int *vfio_container_fd = arg;
> + struct spapr_remap_walk_param *p = arg;
>
> - if (msl->external)
> + if (msl->external || ms->iova >= p->window_size)
> return 0;
>
> - return vfio_spapr_dma_do_map(*vfio_container_fd, ms->addr_64, ms->iova,
> + return vfio_spapr_dma_do_map(p->vfio_container_fd, ms->addr_64, ms->iova,
> ms->len, 1);
> }
>
> +static int
> +vfio_spapr_unmap_walk(const struct rte_memseg_list *msl,
> + const struct rte_memseg *ms, void *arg)
> +{
> + struct spapr_remap_walk_param *p = arg;
> +
> + if (msl->external || ms->iova >= p->window_size)
> + return 0;
> +
> + return vfio_spapr_dma_do_map(p->vfio_container_fd, ms->addr_64, ms->iova,
> + ms->len, 0);
> +}
> +
> struct spapr_walk_param {
> uint64_t window_size;
> uint64_t hugepage_sz;
> @@ -1481,14 +1515,13 @@ vfio_spapr_create_new_dma_window(int vfio_container_fd,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static struct vfio_iommu_spapr_tce_create prev_create;
> +
> static int
> vfio_spapr_dma_mem_map(int vfio_container_fd, uint64_t vaddr, uint64_t iova,
> uint64_t len, int do_map)
> {
> - struct spapr_walk_param param;
> - struct vfio_iommu_spapr_tce_create create = {
> - .argsz = sizeof(create),
> - };
> + struct vfio_iommu_spapr_tce_create create;
> struct vfio_config *vfio_cfg;
> struct user_mem_maps *user_mem_maps;
> int i, ret = 0;
> @@ -1502,43 +1535,59 @@ vfio_spapr_dma_mem_map(int vfio_container_fd, uint64_t vaddr, uint64_t iova,
> user_mem_maps = &vfio_cfg->mem_maps;
> rte_spinlock_recursive_lock(&user_mem_maps->lock);
>
> - /* check if window size needs to be adjusted */
> - memset(¶m, 0, sizeof(param));
> -
> - /* we're inside a callback so use thread-unsafe version */
> - if (rte_memseg_walk_thread_unsafe(vfio_spapr_window_size_walk,
> - ¶m) < 0) {
> - RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Could not get window size\n");
> - ret = -1;
> - goto out;
> - }
> + memcpy(&create, &prev_create, sizeof(create));
>
> /* also check user maps */
> for (i = 0; i < user_mem_maps->n_maps; i++) {
> - uint64_t max = user_mem_maps->maps[i].iova +
> - user_mem_maps->maps[i].len;
> - create.window_size = RTE_MAX(create.window_size, max);
> + struct user_mem_map *map = &user_mem_maps->maps[i];
> +
> + if (vaddr == map->addr && len == map->len)
> + continue;
> + create.window_size = RTE_MAX(create.window_size, map->iova + map->len);
> }
>
> /* sPAPR requires window size to be a power of 2 */
> - create.window_size = rte_align64pow2(param.window_size);
> - create.page_shift = __builtin_ctzll(param.hugepage_sz);
> - create.levels = 1;
> + create.window_size = rte_align64pow2(create.window_size);
>
> if (do_map) {
> - void *addr;
> /* re-create window and remap the entire memory */
> - if (iova > create.window_size) {
> + if (iova + len > create.window_size) {
> + struct spapr_remap_walk_param param = {
> + .vfio_container_fd = vfio_container_fd,
> + .window_size = create.window_size,
> + };
> +
> + /* we're inside a callback, so use thread-unsafe version
> + */
> + rte_memseg_walk_thread_unsafe(vfio_spapr_unmap_walk,
> + ¶m);
> + /* destruct all user maps */
> + for (i = 0; i < user_mem_maps->n_maps; i++) {
> + struct user_mem_map *map =
> + &user_mem_maps->maps[i];
> + if (vaddr == map->addr && len == map->len)
> + continue;
> + if (vfio_spapr_dma_do_map(vfio_container_fd,
> + map->addr, map->iova, map->len,
> + 0)) {
> + RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Could not destruct user DMA maps\n");
> + ret = -1;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + create.window_size = rte_align64pow2(iova + len);
> if (vfio_spapr_create_new_dma_window(vfio_container_fd,
> &create) < 0) {
> RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Could not create new DMA window\n");
> ret = -1;
> goto out;
> }
> + memcpy(&prev_create, &create, sizeof(create));
> /* we're inside a callback, so use thread-unsafe version
> */
> if (rte_memseg_walk_thread_unsafe(vfio_spapr_map_walk,
> - &vfio_container_fd) < 0) {
> + ¶m) < 0) {
> RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Could not recreate DMA maps\n");
> ret = -1;
> goto out;
> @@ -1547,6 +1596,8 @@ vfio_spapr_dma_mem_map(int vfio_container_fd, uint64_t vaddr, uint64_t iova,
> for (i = 0; i < user_mem_maps->n_maps; i++) {
> struct user_mem_map *map =
> &user_mem_maps->maps[i];
> + if (vaddr == map->addr && len == map->len)
> + continue;
> if (vfio_spapr_dma_do_map(vfio_container_fd,
> map->addr, map->iova, map->len,
> 1)) {
> @@ -1556,23 +1607,8 @@ vfio_spapr_dma_mem_map(int vfio_container_fd, uint64_t vaddr, uint64_t iova,
> }
> }
> }
> -
> - /* now that we've remapped all of the memory that was present
> - * before, map the segment that we were requested to map.
> - *
> - * however, if we were called by the callback, the memory we
> - * were called with was already in the memseg list, so previous
> - * mapping should've mapped that segment already.
> - *
> - * virt2memseg_list is a relatively cheap check, so use that. if
> - * memory is within any memseg list, it's a memseg, so it's
> - * already mapped.
> - */
> - addr = (void *)(uintptr_t)vaddr;
> - if (rte_mem_virt2memseg_list(addr) == NULL &&
> - vfio_spapr_dma_do_map(vfio_container_fd,
> - vaddr, iova, len, 1) < 0) {
> - RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Could not map segment\n");
> + if (vfio_spapr_dma_do_map(vfio_container_fd, vaddr, iova, len, 1)) {
> + RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Failed to map DMA\n");
> ret = -1;
> goto out;
> }
> @@ -1613,6 +1649,7 @@ vfio_spapr_dma_map(int vfio_container_fd)
> RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Could not create new DMA window\n");
> return -1;
> }
> + memcpy(&prev_create, &create, sizeof(create));
>
> /* map all DPDK segments for DMA. use 1:1 PA to IOVA mapping */
> if (rte_memseg_walk(vfio_spapr_map_walk, &vfio_container_fd) < 0)
> @@ -1620,6 +1657,21 @@ vfio_spapr_dma_map(int vfio_container_fd)
>
> return 0;
> }
> +#else
> +static int
> +vfio_spapr_dma_mem_map(int __rte_unused vfio_container_fd,
> + uint64_t __rte_unused vaddr,
> + uint64_t __rte_unused iova, uint64_t __rte_unused len,
> + int __rte_unused do_map)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +static int
> +vfio_spapr_dma_map(int __rte_unused vfio_container_fd)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
>
> static int
> vfio_noiommu_dma_map(int __rte_unused vfio_container_fd)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-18 2:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-12 6:33 Takeshi Yoshimura
2019-06-12 14:06 ` Aaron Conole
2019-06-13 2:22 ` Takeshi Yoshimura
2019-06-13 17:37 ` David Christensen
2019-06-14 7:34 ` David Marchand
2019-06-14 7:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Takeshi Yoshimura
2019-07-13 1:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Takeshi Yoshimura
2019-07-16 0:20 ` David Christensen
2019-07-16 10:56 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-06-18 2:37 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Mo, YufengX
2019-06-18 2:39 ` Mo, YufengX [this message]
2019-06-26 9:43 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-06-28 11:38 ` Takeshi T Yoshimura
2019-06-28 13:47 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-06-28 14:04 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-06-13 2:30 ` Takeshi T Yoshimura
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=B8B15C44A3F2C044966E545C7B7371153E7FDFC2@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=yufengx.mo@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=drc@ibm.com \
--cc=pradeep@us.ibm.com \
--cc=tyos@jp.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).