From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACE78A00B8; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 02:37:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15CBA1BF08; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 02:37:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E592F1BF07 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 02:37:15 +0100 (CET) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Oct 2019 18:37:15 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.68,238,1569308400"; d="scan'208";a="203142491" Received: from fmsmsx103.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.201]) by orsmga006.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Oct 2019 18:37:14 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx161.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.125.9) by FMSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 18:37:14 -0700 Received: from shsmsx106.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.159) by FMSMSX161.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.125.9) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Sun, 27 Oct 2019 18:37:14 -0700 Received: from shsmsx101.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.213]) by SHSMSX106.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.10.248]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 09:37:12 +0800 From: "Yu, Jin" To: Thomas Monjalon CC: "dev@dpdk.org" , Maxime Coquelin , "Liu, Changpeng" , "Bie, Tiwei" , "Wang, Zhihong" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 0/9] vhost: support inflight share memory protocol feature Thread-Index: AQHVfqJCr/WneHbn6U+uLJjKt8DrHqdcobMAgA4TUQCAAAELAIAA1roAgAPWEnA= Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 01:37:12 +0000 Message-ID: References: <2725250.B7rqpDpDae@xps> <1910956.GYvDuqMpf4@xps> In-Reply-To: <1910956.GYvDuqMpf4@xps> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiNjQ1NjZjN2EtYTYzNS00NjJlLWEyMzQtMjJmN2NkYTZmM2MwIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX05UIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE3LjEwLjE4MDQuNDkiLCJUcnVzdGVkTGFiZWxIYXNoIjoiemRVYTEwR1JURHBsYkpzUnhnXC9uTU93aXVaeldoajFvMEpTV2EwaFJTSHJ2WjJSa1I5VDZWZTlGd203c1N5NFQifQ== x-ctpclassification: CTP_NT dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.2.0.6 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 0/9] vhost: support inflight share memory protocol feature X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net] > Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2019 7:01 AM > To: Yu, Jin > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Maxime Coquelin ; Liu, > Changpeng ; Bie, Tiwei ; > Wang, Zhihong > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v11 0/9] vhost: support inflight share > memory protocol feature >=20 > 25/10/2019 12:12, Maxime Coquelin: > > On 10/25/19 12:08 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > 16/10/2019 13:12, Maxime Coquelin: > > >> On 10/9/19 10:48 PM, Jin Yu wrote: > > >>> Jin Yu (9): > > >>> vhost: add the inflight description > > >>> vhost: add packed ring > > >>> vhost: add the inflight structure > > >>> vhost: add two new messages to support a shared buffer > > >>> vhost: checkout the resubmit inflight information > > >>> vhost: add the APIs to operate inflight ring > > >>> vhost: add APIs for user getting inflight ring > > >>> vhost: add vring functions packed ring support > > >>> vhost: add vhost-user-blk example which support inflight > > >> > > >> Applied to dpdk-next-virtio/master. > > > > > > Sorry I have to drop the last patch, adding a new example, for 2 reas= ons: > > > > OK, > > > > > - I really would like to see the techboard approving one more example= . > > > > Just FYI, it is a replacement for vhost-scsi, which is removed in this > > release. > > > > > - The compilation was probably not tested enough because the example > > > is not added in meson and make "all examples". > > > > I'll let Jin Yu to submit again last patch with fixing its build. > > Then techboard can decide if it is accepted. Got it. >=20 > While fixing this patch, please add a section in MAINTAINERS. >=20 Got it. Thank.