DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ilya Matveychikov <matvejchikov@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] mbuf: reset nb_segs of chained packet
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 23:15:18 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BE4BD981-E63D-48F6-A19E-873FB22ECBA1@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171116090155.31419fe3@xeon-e3>


> On Nov 16, 2017, at 9:01 PM, Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 18:05:35 +0400
> Ilya Matveychikov <matvejchikov@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Fixes: 139debc42dc0 ("mbuf: move chaining from ip_frag library")
>> Cc: simon.kagstrom@netinsight.net
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Ilya V. Matveychikov <matvejchikov@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 5 ++++-
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
>> index ce8a05ddf..2126dc94b 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
>> +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
>> @@ -1828,9 +1828,12 @@ static inline int rte_pktmbuf_chain(struct rte_mbuf *head, struct rte_mbuf *tail
>> 	head->nb_segs += tail->nb_segs;
>> 	head->pkt_len += tail->pkt_len;
>> 
>> -	/* pkt_len is only set in the head */
>> +	/* nb_segs and pkt_len are only set in the head */
>> +	tail->nb_segs = 1;
>> 	tail->pkt_len = tail->data_len;
>> 
>> +	__rte_mbuf_sanity_check(head, 1);
>> +
>> 	return 0;
>> }
> 
> My understanding is that nb_segs and pkt_len are only valid
> in head. For other packets in the chain nb_segs and pkt_len
> can be anything.

So why not to keep them in consistency with multi-seg logic?
I mean that pkt_len/nb_segs for the head always have meaning but for
the rest of chain pkt_len is the same as data_len and nb_segs := 1

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-16 19:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-16 14:05 Ilya Matveychikov
2017-11-16 17:01 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-11-16 19:15   ` Ilya Matveychikov [this message]
2017-12-01 16:37     ` Olivier MATZ

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BE4BD981-E63D-48F6-A19E-873FB22ECBA1@gmail.com \
    --to=matvejchikov@gmail.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).