Hi Ferruh,

Thanks for your comments.
Yes, you’re right.
After I sent v2 of my patches, I got an error mail saying unable to merge.
New patches from Junfeng pushed to the repo for net/gve.
Anyway I have done requested on patchwork and superseded these v2 patch set.
Sorry for the inconvenience.

Best,
Levend

> On 17 Feb 2023, at 15:43, Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com> wrote:
> 
> On 2/16/2023 6:10 PM, Levend Sayar wrote:
>> Google Virtual NIC is not doing IPv4 checksummimg.
>> Removed that capability from PMD.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Levend Sayar <levendsayar@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/gve/gve_ethdev.c | 1 -
>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/gve/gve_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/gve/gve_ethdev.c
>> index 97781f0ed3..e357f16e16 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/gve/gve_ethdev.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/gve/gve_ethdev.c
>> @@ -282,7 +282,6 @@ gve_dev_info_get(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, struct rte_eth_dev_info *dev_info)
>> 	dev_info->rx_offload_capa = 0;
>> 	dev_info->tx_offload_capa =
>> 		RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_MULTI_SEGS	|
>> -		RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_IPV4_CKSUM	|
>> 		RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM	|
>> 		RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM	|
>> 		RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_SCTP_CKSUM	|
> 
> Hi Levend,
> 
> 
> there are multiple version of same patch, it is confusing for reviewers
> and maintainers.
> 
> Can you please:
> 
> - User versions tag, and keep increasing it. Like this one has v2, which
> is good, but next one sent after this doesn't have any version tag.
> 
> - Use git send-email '--in-reply-to' parameter to keep all versions in
> same email thread. More details on documentation:
> https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/contributing/patches.html#sending-patches
> 
> - Clean patchwork after a new version sent by marking old version
> appropriately (most of times as 'superseded')
> https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?submitter=1813
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> ferruh