From: "Zhang, Roy Fan" <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>
To: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>, Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>,
"Nicolau, Radu" <radu.nicolau@intel.com>,
"Doherty, Declan" <declan.doherty@intel.com>,
"hemant.agrawal@nxp.com" <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
"Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"asomalap@amd.com" <asomalap@amd.com>,
"ruifeng.wang@arm.com" <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>,
"ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com" <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>,
"De Lara Guarch, Pablo" <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>,
"Trahe, Fiona" <fiona.trahe@intel.com>,
Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com>,
Michael Shamis <michaelsh@marvell.com>,
Nagadheeraj Rottela <rnagadheeraj@marvell.com>,
"jianjay.zhou@huawei.com" <jianjay.zhou@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] examples/fips_validation: remove illegal usage of APIs
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 20:27:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BL0PR11MB304307BB60A44D1D98567E3FB8CB9@BL0PR11MB3043.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CO6PR18MB448446244999273F48F4F48BD8F89@CO6PR18MB4484.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2021 9:20 AM
> To: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>; Nicolau, Radu
> <radu.nicolau@intel.com>; Doherty, Declan <declan.doherty@intel.com>;
> hemant.agrawal@nxp.com; Ananyev, Konstantin
> <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>; NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon
> <thomas@monjalon.net>; Zhang, Roy Fan <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>;
> asomalap@amd.com; ruifeng.wang@arm.com;
> ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
> <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>; Trahe, Fiona <fiona.trahe@intel.com>;
> Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com>; Michael Shamis
> <michaelsh@marvell.com>; Nagadheeraj Rottela
> <rnagadheeraj@marvell.com>; jianjay.zhou@huawei.com
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 3/4] examples/fips_validation: remove illegal usage of
> APIs
>
> >
> > From: Akhil Goyal
> > > Some of the cryptodev APIs are not allowed to be used by application
> > > directly. Hence removing the usage of 1. queue_pair_release: it is not
> > > required, as configure
> > > of queue pair release the previous queue pairs and the
> > > dev is not directly exposed to application, hence cannot
> > > use its ops from app.
> > > 2. rte_cryptodev_stop: it can be used directly without
> > > checking if the device is started or not.
> > > 3. rte_cryptodev_pmd_destroy: application should use
> > > rte_cryptodev_close instead.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
> >
> > Look's like it should be backported to stable releases with a Fixes reference.
> > What do you think?
> >
> > Besides,
> > Acked-by: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>
> >
> Yes, Agreed.
> I wanted to get opinion from the Maintainer of fips app first if the changes
> are
> Correct or not.
Hi Akhil,
FIPS requirement is upon failure of running self-test the device memory
shall be destroyed completely and not visible by the application at all -
rte_cryptodev_close does not provide this functionality.
In this case we may need new API rte_cryptodev_destroy() to replace
rte_cryptodev_pmd_destroy().
Regards,
Fan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-30 20:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-05 20:02 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] cryptodev: expose driver interface as internal Akhil Goyal
2021-08-05 20:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] test/crypto: remove illegal header include Akhil Goyal
2021-08-30 20:16 ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2021-08-05 20:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] cryptodev: change valid dev API Akhil Goyal
2021-08-30 20:16 ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2021-08-05 20:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] examples/fips_validation: remove illegal usage of APIs Akhil Goyal
2021-08-05 20:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] cryptodev: expose driver interface as internal Akhil Goyal
2021-08-10 19:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] " Akhil Goyal
2021-08-10 19:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] test/crypto: remove illegal header include Akhil Goyal
2021-08-11 6:52 ` Matan Azrad
2021-08-10 19:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] cryptodev: change valid dev API Akhil Goyal
2021-08-11 6:54 ` Matan Azrad
2021-08-11 8:12 ` Akhil Goyal
2021-08-10 19:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] examples/fips_validation: remove illegal usage of APIs Akhil Goyal
2021-08-11 6:56 ` Matan Azrad
2021-08-11 8:19 ` Akhil Goyal
2021-08-30 20:27 ` Zhang, Roy Fan [this message]
2021-08-31 7:03 ` Akhil Goyal
2021-08-31 8:38 ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2021-08-10 19:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] cryptodev: expose driver interface as internal Akhil Goyal
2021-08-11 7:00 ` Matan Azrad
2021-08-11 8:20 ` Akhil Goyal
2021-08-30 20:30 ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2021-09-07 19:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] " Akhil Goyal
2021-09-07 19:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] test/crypto: remove illegal header include Akhil Goyal
2021-09-07 19:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] cryptodev: change valid dev API Akhil Goyal
2021-09-07 19:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] examples/fips_validation: remove illegal usage of APIs Akhil Goyal
2021-09-07 19:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] cryptodev: expose driver interface as internal Akhil Goyal
2021-09-07 19:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/4] " Akhil Goyal
2021-09-07 19:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/4] test/crypto: remove illegal header include Akhil Goyal
2021-09-08 6:38 ` Hemant Agrawal
2021-09-08 8:05 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2021-09-07 19:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/4] cryptodev: change valid dev API Akhil Goyal
2021-09-08 15:16 ` Akhil Goyal
2021-09-07 19:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/4] examples/fips_validation: remove illegal usage of APIs Akhil Goyal
2021-09-07 19:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/4] cryptodev: expose driver interface as internal Akhil Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BL0PR11MB304307BB60A44D1D98567E3FB8CB9@BL0PR11MB3043.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=roy.fan.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=adwivedi@marvell.com \
--cc=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
--cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
--cc=asomalap@amd.com \
--cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=fiona.trahe@intel.com \
--cc=gakhil@marvell.com \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=jianjay.zhou@huawei.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=matan@nvidia.com \
--cc=michaelsh@marvell.com \
--cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
--cc=radu.nicolau@intel.com \
--cc=rnagadheeraj@marvell.com \
--cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).