From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54175A0577; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 10:49:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30FC31C243; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 10:49:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3E5D1C194 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 10:49:49 +0200 (CEST) IronPort-SDR: NZGsuUFuRXPushHPHl0xQ1UWugdPIdhwPD0eC1ARDzE+tl36oAsPiSYCB+P4TA5YheusHWg5Zt ibZG7XV7NBEA== X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Apr 2020 01:49:48 -0700 IronPort-SDR: F+w6z1rkeshYnePLipPazAdX0W+P/CQLgkJYbemBrtn94D8MIQgzPKwF9i6aFvgtZs3il4VoId rDZ8xgFtF9tg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.72,382,1580803200"; d="scan'208";a="288156009" Received: from orsmsx101.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.225.128]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Apr 2020 01:49:48 -0700 Received: from orsmsx603.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.229.16) by ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.225.128) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 01:49:48 -0700 Received: from orsmsx603.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.229.16) by ORSMSX603.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.229.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 01:49:47 -0700 Received: from ORSEDG002.ED.cps.intel.com (10.7.248.5) by orsmsx603.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.229.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 01:49:47 -0700 Received: from NAM11-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (104.47.56.169) by edgegateway.intel.com (134.134.137.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 01:49:47 -0700 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=JLuXHdK9R/rmHrkm55M11uEbLASFHGHpqV9pyES/KUcT2n66weiNGt0fjlUBTMdqnhLY3Y+pSj2XEIP7asRC2TCZzLACVnG1SQ3PJJlPeVs3DkWC/Ln14Ir26bHZv/jd1MKYw597EqtSPQGYGrggk4fz2giQ4L0WLfTzngkRwXCGlWj/rzzLjW/S2GpD9oOHZZ+DnOiq1md/45Bua4fYcqfhra6bHI2zHpPZ2yFZ5/Tbi9xf8gbx+BZ8RLBzOl5+ERMe7tQh9pB0/BWAQ79QFpWF/Q/NBlykq3y/bNJsBb2Ja7adtcOcOYHtKOlUnXESLVzvEDO4DQ901ZcP7okRAQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=cX5JKJiPwLSCgQzHEl9mHMCqRG4Njf8ti3MY/LrCwnY=; b=VLujY9bQRNN15DKaf4ry5Yonmo1o8fOSgqgKw1FqjpWR/gE7xLM094SsDFx2tS0MpI2QF1zMqdZ25x5eMavUQz8PBRMsdaDfFdqhGNKlqfa2htpiYtNCNHhyCnoWNzDMfpFR53939TQMF7jVlzBjn9vWG6/dC2H4zKbU2N5zeTrkv7L+AL9DNQqfFv3fxprL61UEqJ+IUik0KCBFWNgdDw0NeNkCAjeDWa6v3Lqs6GFt1mi04mrycOLxT4ry3IfiwkLAq8FsLzMuXRXX9Yu9iHPFGZk2URyRQYHJ5hxr+C81tNS55wDCKHFxfixAm6VmG5ssJQ+x8vE+JBsYnNnLdw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=intel.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-intel-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=cX5JKJiPwLSCgQzHEl9mHMCqRG4Njf8ti3MY/LrCwnY=; b=G1CEDCXH2SY142KfIX7x4H4xUgas4YfXrcgCljLLd+3KiZ2eQBOT1WYzP/dM51RMlke6E1nm5pMU3JwxR5XhwU6IOlW0/nPljK+vi9GRYV0GQPz/so6maIgnEC6vpKQiPudIj/SQBd4rbYoKtsGXasNPZ1zYkONJ7kA/28ALYVQ= Received: from BL0PR11MB3090.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:74::23) by BL0PR11MB3524.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:73::21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2900.28; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 08:49:44 +0000 Received: from BL0PR11MB3090.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::f1da:6bd0:7fe4:53ce]) by BL0PR11MB3090.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::f1da:6bd0:7fe4:53ce%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2900.026; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 08:49:44 +0000 From: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" To: Thomas Monjalon , "dev@dpdk.org" , "akhil.goyal@nxp.com" CC: "O'loingsigh, Mairtin" , "Doherty, Declan" , "Dybkowski, AdamX" , "Trahe, Fiona" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] test/crypto: Add AES-256 DOCSIS test vectors Thread-Index: AQHWEOmi+hLlkUwVPkKyZFn0b4fNSqh4UGBA Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 08:49:44 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1586354671-25703-1-git-send-email-mairtin.oloingsigh@intel.com> <1586531010-32279-2-git-send-email-mairtin.oloingsigh@intel.com> <9210853.NyiUUSuA9g@thomas> In-Reply-To: <9210853.NyiUUSuA9g@thomas> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-reaction: no-action dlp-version: 11.2.0.6 authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com; x-originating-ip: [192.198.151.164] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 24627925-f050-4174-a2f1-08d7e050c7ad x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BL0PR11MB3524: x-ld-processed: 46c98d88-e344-4ed4-8496-4ed7712e255d,ExtAddr x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508; x-forefront-prvs: 0373D94D15 x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BL0PR11MB3090.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(10019020)(376002)(136003)(346002)(366004)(396003)(39860400002)(66946007)(66446008)(107886003)(5660300002)(64756008)(66556008)(66476007)(316002)(9686003)(110136005)(55016002)(478600001)(4326008)(52536014)(76116006)(54906003)(7696005)(71200400001)(2906002)(86362001)(26005)(33656002)(81156014)(186003)(6506007)(8936002)(53546011); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: XDXMHeFqbk3qfKhWLJgUV21ouwjfCuVPw3R+Eih3rbTG0jRN5dD4jVbyuNbOYdohKQWeyG1Octx8GWN3j6SN2TSJIlQOQOpEqgWpvhgIarSH/JCpUq6oAO7kiosDerNtCejEfnnhInuQ7Nxg175iHSsp3Spd0AXpI5o09BVLP+TZOc54zVXJA/uSPQ2DFilw9XuAIriNzEGXkEYs2ZuBVj/q4uVSzyebsG44JMmn/NOtI1xCvHENP5Rv4mDhGtaiFRHp76diIyksTtEiJVGjitEAZn6CFxt3X++Dd5pZWqXmOpzCksC0YINran2YPabaLSfpLRxUh1bi+QjFfXKLe2fvhqA5meBAg8tEcXIVegS+yRDX+lHshcqogJDhvxEyYhEkoAebsxFKCaiYIZjGABrhomvHL2/A87aIS10XRE7nljYNIdvOkNzYQJWNKeXA x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: TVSl9Ml57e1bG2B1Dt8h8Y6KW5L74psasCKvvxqaoOvw8A1r8WKefU3Zlsu0QVC4TLOQ76vII9l9lETu+KAXsZFxd2bGDDFLcKrl8KFrhcpa7zKCkvBaCpCAdojAtNwXHY+kVBT3nEMQT9GBKwO1Ig== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 24627925-f050-4174-a2f1-08d7e050c7ad X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 14 Apr 2020 08:49:44.6866 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 46c98d88-e344-4ed4-8496-4ed7712e255d X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: PW/8d7iLnUrn7SEufxxQzSjf5R7dniTgQm7HvMtgdYAMrrLLxCANs4A41cVjxERmF8A0ZOGOOg/+XWxY6bjtHaWfHgpZD6jXlLsYAIvUm9g= X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BL0PR11MB3524 X-OriginatorOrg: intel.com Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] test/crypto: Add AES-256 DOCSIS test vectors X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi Thomas, > -----Original Message----- > From: dev On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon > Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2020 5:44 PM > To: dev@dpdk.org; akhil.goyal@nxp.com > Cc: De Lara Guarch, Pablo ; O'loingsigh, > Mairtin ; Doherty, Declan > ; Dybkowski, AdamX > ; Trahe, Fiona > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] test/crypto: Add AES-256 DOCSIS te= st > vectors >=20 > 10/04/2020 17:03, Mairtin o Loingsigh: > > This patch adds test vectors for AES-256 and sets AESNI-MB as the > > target PMD >=20 > There is really something wrong in the cryptodev API. > Why the PMD must be selected in the tests? > Isn't there some capabilities in cryptodev? > Whitelisting PMD in the test prevents testing capabilities API. >=20 > It looks the required refactoring is not progressing enough. > I suggest blocking all crypto-related patches until is is fixed. >=20 You are right, but Mairtin was following the same approach as it was taken = previously. I agree that this approach is not the best one and we are currently working on a better solution. Thanks, Pablo