DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / Atom feed
From: "Kinsella, Ray" <ray.kinsella@intel.com>
To: "Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>, dev <dev@dpdk.org>,
	Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] version: 20.02-rc0
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2019 15:43:03 +0000
Message-ID: <BN6PR11MB4145831B521AF97F2024DCD290430@BN6PR11MB4145.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191202154012.GA34@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com>

QQ.

What do you plan to do then, when you go for longer periods of ABI stability?

Ray K

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> Sent: Monday 2 December 2019 15:40
> To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>; dev <dev@dpdk.org>; Neil
> Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>; Kinsella, Ray <ray.kinsella@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] version: 20.02-rc0
> 
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 04:29:06PM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 3:57 PM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Start a new release cycle with empty release notes.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > I would prefer increasing the ABI version to 20.2 for an easy
> > > mapping with code version:
> > >         DPDK 19.11 = ABI 20
> > >         libs 19.11 = .so.20.0
> > >         DPDK 20.02 = ABI 20
> > >         libs 20.02 = .so.20.2
> > >         DPDK 20.05 = ABI 20
> > >         libs 20.05 = .so.20.5
> > >         DPDK 20.08 = ABI 20
> > >         libs 20.08 = .so.20.8
> > >
> > > Opinions?
> >
> > +1 but no strong opinion.
> >
> I like that idea too, though again no strong opinion either way.

  reply index

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-02 14:57 Thomas Monjalon
2019-12-02 15:29 ` David Marchand
2019-12-02 15:40   ` Bruce Richardson
2019-12-02 15:43     ` Kinsella, Ray [this message]
2019-12-02 16:13       ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-12-02 16:27         ` Kinsella, Ray
2019-12-03 10:10   ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BN6PR11MB4145831B521AF97F2024DCD290430@BN6PR11MB4145.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=ray.kinsella@intel.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK patches and discussions

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
		dev@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index dev


Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.dev


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox