From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB2D6A00BE; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 20:32:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26CA01E86E; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 20:32:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-174.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-174.mimecast.com [216.205.24.174]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41B1D1E863 for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 20:32:16 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=idirect.net; s=mimecast20190311; t=1572636735; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+SAA0cvDTHbY3uPCiVilBRoDEzXLCs9C9qK49nNLxRU=; b=h5XHuJTWLt6V1WMF0YmQE7z/DVEdz2Nzw2gLBym3ci52Th0s7htCPQd4LJZdavu2qHucAK M9WSug/CMl4omJT2C2z3Ba8nD3pcsSZzcRRBIVh4euUNw7IYX4iukapt8pbFEtUz+GoM5j qCLTdU7a8sHyna1P4yzdnoT5dke9x8E= Received: from NAM05-DM3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm3nam05lp2056.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.49.56]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-245-SXIBtMKgN4ahE8gwDMp00A-1; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 15:32:12 -0400 Received: from BN6PR22MB0771.namprd22.prod.outlook.com (10.171.179.141) by BN6PR22MB0017.namprd22.prod.outlook.com (10.168.254.150) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2387.24; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 19:32:11 +0000 Received: from BN6PR22MB0771.namprd22.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::fcc7:afd0:88ff:5c5e]) by BN6PR22MB0771.namprd22.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::fcc7:afd0:88ff:5c5e%10]) with mapi id 15.20.2408.024; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 19:32:11 +0000 From: "Gladchun, Glenn" To: "Singh, Jasvinder" , "dev@dpdk.org" CC: "Dumitrescu, Cristian" , "Yigit, Ferruh" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] DPDK QoS scheduler changes, are we there yet? Thread-Index: AQHVj1DEH5H+I7vZlkCm+W8yq3Z9mKd03P4AgAAqPQCAAa+5eQ== Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2019 19:32:11 +0000 Message-ID: References: <3FD7CF4F-3FEA-4557-9D5C-3D30A6A8331E@idirect.net> <25abaaf3-9a92-a3a5-c2a1-3015ef809546@intel.com>, <54CBAA185211B4429112C315DA58FF6D3FE5D002@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <54CBAA185211B4429112C315DA58FF6D3FE5D002@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [198.180.159.2] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 5baf9505-fe98-4abd-fb9e-08d75f023118 x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN6PR22MB0017: x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 1 x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508; x-forefront-prvs: 020877E0CB x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(39850400004)(396003)(366004)(346002)(136003)(376002)(189003)(13464003)(199004)(4326008)(102836004)(7736002)(52536014)(256004)(110136005)(74316002)(55016002)(71200400001)(71190400001)(14444005)(316002)(86362001)(99286004)(66066001)(54896002)(6306002)(236005)(6246003)(2501003)(9686003)(25786009)(66446008)(64756008)(6436002)(26005)(3846002)(81166006)(81156014)(186003)(5660300002)(476003)(8676002)(8936002)(66946007)(486006)(2906002)(606006)(6506007)(53546011)(11346002)(66556008)(66476007)(54906003)(229853002)(508600001)(446003)(76176011)(7696005)(6116002)(76116006)(14454004)(33656002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BN6PR22MB0017; H:BN6PR22MB0771.namprd22.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: GcG7Xy4rqVKnt4T3AADO45NTQjFVFsFq3OLt7eltReH+GBrbC10YRw8sJI+RadHKJ6F4borPO6jpJDBHpkQq/L3Z/oy2bETEFqbuqj3faTufT8SaeSbEhWdJqdhPdv6nibX7mTmURErrV1wa+TADiKhn9hbhJOz8wQomRkw1kR8ghW9uCOzZkh1ZUyiVQdrkc1fxhvxd/1paMq/t7oho4tzlq1ED9TXx8pHqFGvBi4YOABP4pZPT3VuCSQU/QIZGvsB4PYYu1Y334tChC39zW3oXQlhZqF7AwkwlBYTQCu/YCKkyFkBTcXnIn5KSuKLRhmQTiZO8UBjCRGhvw/9N1VeQrTmYq2EjLwMuOX3kE98WhbAj3YujTP1TSJ1kvkLTSu+630/I2Gfxyc2l83s/xK3QKv+m/ab/ID7lJrkiymNPO/udl0jHXAt4gasYNUqigWwM0Qc2jMDonCsL6twxqjTVzyOqk8QfkpfQZg6rU3I= x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: idirect.net X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 5baf9505-fe98-4abd-fb9e-08d75f023118 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 01 Nov 2019 19:32:11.2449 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 6bf0cd58-ceef-4562-b1b7-c1602ea60d67 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: P6L4ZQ6HK/dtbd3YOYCDNYsmYC3IQFiyZlz3nEGv/E1fcfzVdBWCuLyXFZAnFyYgg9lmGGB4BHbDOZ5J+z1hvw== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN6PR22MB0017 X-MC-Unique: SXIBtMKgN4ahE8gwDMp00A-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK QoS scheduler changes, are we there yet? X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Jasvinder, Thanks! Got confused by outdated documentation that still references old de= sign... Glenn Sent from iPad ________________________________ From: Singh, Jasvinder Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 1:45 PM To: Gladchun, Glenn; dev@dpdk.org Cc: Dumitrescu, Cristian; Yigit, Ferruh Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] DPDK QoS scheduler changes, are we there yet? ***WARNING! THIS EMAIL ORIGINATES FROM OUTSIDE ST ENGINEERING IDIRECT.*** > -----Original Message----- > From: Yigit, Ferruh > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 3:14 PM > To: Gladchun, Glenn ; dev@dpdk.org > Cc: Singh, Jasvinder ; Dumitrescu, Cristian > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK QoS scheduler changes, are we there yet? > > On 10/30/2019 6:35 PM, Gladchun, Glenn wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > I stumbled upon this 11 month old post (https://narkive.com/ZwBXg4Xe) > that goes over future enhancements to the scheduler. All of them are vita= l, > and I am especially interested in 16 TCs per pipe=E2=80=A6 Christian and/= or Jasvinder, > is the future here yet in some tangible shape or form? > > cc'ed Jasvinder & Cristian. > > > Hi Glenn, The DPDK sched library has been modified to increase the number of traffic = classes per pipe, please refer source code available on dpdk master to see = the changes. Thanks, Jasvinder This electronic message and any files transmitted with it contains informat= ion from iDirect, which may be privileged, proprietary and/or confidential.= It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they= are addressed.=20 If you are not the original recipient or the person responsible for deliver= ing the email to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received = this email in error, and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing,= or copying of=20 this email is strictly prohibited. If you received this email in error, ple= ase delete it and immediately notify the sender.