DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dkozlyuk@nvidia.com>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>,
	Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1 2/6] app/test: add allocator performance benchmark
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 21:12:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BN8PR12MB2899B9D08D2A2A599648C9E8B9599@BN8PR12MB2899.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YeWQcZ0azt3fGtpK@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com>

> From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> [...]
> > What is the expected running time of this test? When I tried it out
> on my
> > machine it appears to hang after the following output:
> > [...]

It always runs within 50 seconds on my machine (E5-1650 v3 @ 3.50GHz).
Judging by the output, it runs faster than yours
(203 vs 811 total microseconds in 1M allocation case):

USER1: Reference: memset
USER1: Result: 14.557848.3 GiB/s <=> 67.08 us/MiB
USER1: 
USER1: Performance: rte_malloc
USER1:     Size (B)    Runs  Alloc (us)   Free (us)  Total (us)      memset (us)
USER1:           64   10000        0.09        0.04        0.13             0.01
USER1:          128   10000        0.09        0.04        0.13             0.01
USER1:         1024   10000        0.12        0.09        0.21             0.11
USER1:         4096   10000        0.15        0.40        0.55             0.27
USER1:        65536   10000        0.16        4.37        4.53             4.25
USER1:      1048576   10000       73.85      129.23      203.07            67.26
USER1:      2097152    7154      148.98      259.42      408.39           134.34
USER1:      4194304    3570      298.28      519.76      818.04           268.65
USER1:     16777216     882     1206.85     2093.46     3300.30          1074.25
USER1:   1073741824       6   188765.01   206544.04   395309.06         68739.83
[...]

Note that to see --huge-unlink effect you must run it twice:
the first run creates and leaves the files, the second reuses them.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-19 21:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-30 14:37 [RFC PATCH 0/6] Fast restart with many hugepages Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-12-30 14:37 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] doc: add hugepage mapping details Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-12-30 14:37 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] mem: add dirty malloc element support Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-12-30 14:37 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] eal: refactor --huge-unlink storage Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-12-30 14:37 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] eal/linux: allow hugepage file reuse Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-12-30 14:48 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] eal: allow hugepage file reuse with --huge-unlink Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-12-30 14:49 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] app/test: add allocator performance benchmark Dmitry Kozlyuk
2022-01-17  8:07 ` [PATCH v1 0/6] Fast restart with many hugepages Dmitry Kozlyuk
2022-01-17  8:07   ` [PATCH v1 1/6] doc: add hugepage mapping details Dmitry Kozlyuk
2022-01-17  9:20     ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-01-17  8:07   ` [PATCH v1 2/6] app/test: add allocator performance benchmark Dmitry Kozlyuk
2022-01-17 15:47     ` Bruce Richardson
2022-01-17 15:51       ` Bruce Richardson
2022-01-19 21:12         ` Dmitry Kozlyuk [this message]
2022-01-20  9:04           ` Bruce Richardson
2022-01-17 16:06     ` Aaron Conole
2022-01-17  8:07   ` [PATCH v1 3/6] mem: add dirty malloc element support Dmitry Kozlyuk
2022-01-17 14:07     ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-01-17  8:07   ` [PATCH v1 4/6] eal: refactor --huge-unlink storage Dmitry Kozlyuk
2022-01-17 14:10     ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-01-17  8:14   ` [PATCH v1 5/6] eal/linux: allow hugepage file reuse Dmitry Kozlyuk
2022-01-17 14:24     ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-01-17  8:14   ` [PATCH v1 6/6] eal: extend --huge-unlink for " Dmitry Kozlyuk
2022-01-17 14:27     ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-01-17 16:40   ` [PATCH v1 0/6] Fast restart with many hugepages Bruce Richardson
2022-01-19 21:12     ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2022-01-20  9:05       ` Bruce Richardson
2022-01-19 21:09   ` [PATCH v2 " Dmitry Kozlyuk
2022-01-19 21:09     ` [PATCH v2 1/6] doc: add hugepage mapping details Dmitry Kozlyuk
2022-01-27 13:59       ` Bruce Richardson
2022-01-19 21:09     ` [PATCH v2 2/6] app/test: add allocator performance benchmark Dmitry Kozlyuk
2022-01-19 21:09     ` [PATCH v2 3/6] mem: add dirty malloc element support Dmitry Kozlyuk
2022-01-19 21:09     ` [PATCH v2 4/6] eal: refactor --huge-unlink storage Dmitry Kozlyuk
2022-01-19 21:11     ` [PATCH v2 5/6] eal/linux: allow hugepage file reuse Dmitry Kozlyuk
2022-01-19 21:11       ` [PATCH v2 6/6] eal: extend --huge-unlink for " Dmitry Kozlyuk
2022-01-27 12:07     ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Fast restart with many hugepages Bruce Richardson
2022-02-02 14:12     ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-02-02 21:54     ` David Marchand
2022-02-03 10:26       ` David Marchand
2022-02-03 18:13     ` [PATCH v3 " Dmitry Kozlyuk
2022-02-03 18:13       ` [PATCH v3 1/6] doc: add hugepage mapping details Dmitry Kozlyuk
2022-02-08 15:28         ` Burakov, Anatoly
2022-02-03 18:13       ` [PATCH v3 2/6] app/test: add allocator performance benchmark Dmitry Kozlyuk
2022-02-08 16:20         ` Burakov, Anatoly
2022-02-03 18:13       ` [PATCH v3 3/6] mem: add dirty malloc element support Dmitry Kozlyuk
2022-02-08 16:36         ` Burakov, Anatoly
2022-02-03 18:13       ` [PATCH v3 4/6] eal: refactor --huge-unlink storage Dmitry Kozlyuk
2022-02-08 16:39         ` Burakov, Anatoly
2022-02-03 18:13       ` [PATCH v3 5/6] eal/linux: allow hugepage file reuse Dmitry Kozlyuk
2022-02-08 17:05         ` Burakov, Anatoly
2022-02-03 18:13       ` [PATCH v3 6/6] eal: extend --huge-unlink for " Dmitry Kozlyuk
2022-02-08 17:14         ` Burakov, Anatoly
2022-02-08 20:40       ` [PATCH v3 0/6] Fast restart with many hugepages David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BN8PR12MB2899B9D08D2A2A599648C9E8B9599@BN8PR12MB2899.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=dkozlyuk@nvidia.com \
    --cc=aconole@redhat.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).