From: "Ding, Xuan" <xuan.ding@intel.com>
To: "Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>,
"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
"andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru" <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"stephen@networkplumber.org" <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
"mb@smartsharesystems.com" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>,
"viacheslavo@nvidia.com" <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>,
"Yu, Ping" <ping.yu@intel.com>,
"Wu, WenxuanX" <wenxuanx.wu@intel.com>,
"Wang, YuanX" <yuanx.wang@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC,v2 1/3] ethdev: introduce protocol type based header split
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 07:43:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BN9PR11MB5513A6CFEBEADD87AC638D5BE7179@BN9PR11MB5513.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7912b7c67946402186fd8e318715d5a0@intel.com>
Hi Qi,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2022 3:14 PM
> To: Ding, Xuan <xuan.ding@intel.com>; thomas@monjalon.net; Yigit, Ferruh
> <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>; andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; stephen@networkplumber.org;
> mb@smartsharesystems.com; viacheslavo@nvidia.com; Yu, Ping
> <ping.yu@intel.com>; Wu, WenxuanX <wenxuanx.wu@intel.com>; Wang,
> YuanX <yuanx.wang@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [RFC,v2 1/3] ethdev: introduce protocol type based header split
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ding, Xuan <xuan.ding@intel.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2022 11:56 AM
> > To: thomas@monjalon.net; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>;
> > andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; stephen@networkplumber.org;
> > mb@smartsharesystems.com; viacheslavo@nvidia.com; Zhang, Qi Z
> > <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>; Yu, Ping <ping.yu@intel.com>; Wu, WenxuanX
> > <wenxuanx.wu@intel.com>; Ding, Xuan <xuan.ding@intel.com>; Wang,
> YuanX
> > <yuanx.wang@intel.com>
> > Subject: [RFC,v2 1/3] ethdev: introduce protocol type based header
> > split
> >
> > From: Xuan Ding <xuan.ding@intel.com>
> >
> > Header split consists of splitting a received packet into two separate
> > regions based on the packet content. The split happens after the
> > packet header and before the packet payload. Splitting is usually
> > between the packet header that can be posted to a dedicated buffer and
> > the packet payload that can be posted to a different buffer.
> >
> > Currently, Rx buffer split supports length and offset based packet split.
> > Although header split is a subset of buffer split, configure buffer
> > split based on length and offset is not suitable for NICs that do
> > split based on header protocol types. And tunneling makes the
> > conversion from offset to protocol impossible.
> >
> > This patch extends the current buffer split to support protocol based
> > header split. A new proto field is introduced in the
> > rte_eth_rxseg_split structure reserved field to specify header
> > protocol type. With Rx offload flag RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_HEADER_SPLIT
> > enabled and protocol type configured, PMD will split the ingress packets
> into two separate regions.
> > Currently, both inner and outer L2/L3/L4 level header split can be
> supported.
> >
> > For example, let's suppose we configured the Rx queue with the
> > following
> > segments:
> > seg0 - pool0
> > seg1 - pool1
> >
> > With header split type configured with RTE_ETH_RX_HEADER_SPLIT_UDP,
> > the packet consists of MAC_IP_UDP_PAYLOAD will be split like following:
> > seg0 - pool0, udp_header
> > seg1 - pool1, payload
> >
> > The memory attributes for the split parts may differ either - for
> > example the
> > mempool0 and mempool1 belong to dpdk memory and external memory,
> > respectively.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xuan Ding <xuan.ding@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Yuan Wang <yuanx.wang@intel.com>
> > ---
> > lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c | 24 +++++++++++++----------
> > lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h | 43
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c index
> > 70c850a2f1..49c8fef1c3 100644
> > --- a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> > @@ -1661,6 +1661,7 @@ rte_eth_rx_queue_check_split(const struct
> > rte_eth_rxseg_split *rx_seg, struct rte_mempool *mpl =
> > rx_seg[seg_idx].mp; uint32_t length = rx_seg[seg_idx].length;
> > uint32_t offset = rx_seg[seg_idx].offset;
> > +uint16_t proto = rx_seg[seg_idx].proto;
> >
> > if (mpl == NULL) {
> > RTE_ETHDEV_LOG(ERR, "null mempool pointer\n"); @@ -1692,15
> +1693,17
> > @@ rte_eth_rx_queue_check_split(const struct rte_eth_rxseg_split
> > *rx_seg, (struct rte_pktmbuf_pool_private)); return -ENOSPC; }
> > -offset += seg_idx != 0 ? 0 : RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM; -*mbp_buf_size =
> > rte_pktmbuf_data_room_size(mpl); -length = length != 0 ? length :
> > *mbp_buf_size; -if (*mbp_buf_size < length + offset) {
> > -RTE_ETHDEV_LOG(ERR,
> > - "%s mbuf_data_room_size %u < %u
> > (segment length=%u + segment offset=%u)\n",
> > - mpl->name, *mbp_buf_size,
> > - length + offset, length, offset);
> > -return -EINVAL;
> > +if (proto == 0) {
> > +offset += seg_idx != 0 ? 0 :
> > RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM;
> > +*mbp_buf_size =
> > rte_pktmbuf_data_room_size(mpl);
> > +length = length != 0 ? length : *mbp_buf_size; if (*mbp_buf_size <
> > +length + offset) { RTE_ETHDEV_LOG(ERR, "%s mbuf_data_room_size %u <
> > +%u
> > (segment length=%u + segment offset=%u)\n",
> > +mpl->name, *mbp_buf_size,
> > +length + offset, length, offset);
> > +return -EINVAL;
> > +}
> > }
>
> As the length and proto is exclusive, it better also check the length when
> proto!=0
Thanks for your comments, will fix it in next version.
>
> .....
>
> > @@ -1197,12 +1197,26 @@ struct rte_eth_txmode {
> > * - pool from the last valid element
> > * - the buffer size from this pool
> > * - zero offset
> > + *
> > + * Header split is a subset of buffer split. The split happens after
> > + the
> > + * packet header and before the packet payload. For PMDs that do not
> > + * support header split configuration by length and offset, the
> > + location
> > + * of the split needs to be specified by the header protocol type.
> > + While for
> > + * buffer split, this field should not be configured.
> > + *
> > + * If RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_HEADER_SPLIT flag is set in offloads field,
> > + * the PMD will split the received packets into two separate regions:
> > + * - The header buffer will be allocated from the memory pool,
> > + * specified in the first array element, the second buffer, from the
> > + * pool in the second element.
> > + * - The length and offset do not need to be configured in header split.
>
> We may not necessarily ignore the offset configure for header split as there
> is no confliction, a driver still can support copying a split header to a specific
> mbuf offset And if we support offset with header split, offset boundary check
> can also be considered in rte_eth_rx_queue_check_split
You are right. Only length and proto is exclusive in between buffer split and header split.
Will update in next version.
Thanks,
Xuan
>
> Regards
> Qi
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-22 7:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-03 6:01 [RFC] " xuan.ding
2022-03-03 8:55 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-03-08 7:48 ` Ding, Xuan
2022-03-03 16:15 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-03-04 9:58 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2022-03-04 11:54 ` Morten Brørup
2022-03-04 17:32 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-03-22 3:56 ` [RFC,v2 0/3] " xuan.ding
2022-03-22 3:56 ` [RFC,v2 1/3] " xuan.ding
2022-03-22 7:14 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2022-03-22 7:43 ` Ding, Xuan [this message]
2022-03-22 3:56 ` [RFC,v2 2/3] app/testpmd: add header split configuration xuan.ding
2022-03-22 3:56 ` [RFC,v2 3/3] net/ice: support header split in Rx data path xuan.ding
2022-03-29 6:49 ` [RFC,v3 0/3] ethdev: introduce protocol type based header split xuan.ding
2022-03-29 6:49 ` [RFC,v3 1/3] " xuan.ding
2022-03-29 7:56 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2022-03-29 8:18 ` Ding, Xuan
2022-03-29 6:49 ` [RFC,v3 2/3] app/testpmd: add header split configuration xuan.ding
2022-03-29 6:49 ` [RFC,v3 3/3] net/ice: support header split in Rx data path xuan.ding
2022-04-02 10:41 ` [v4 0/3] ethdev: introduce protocol type based header split wenxuanx.wu
2022-04-02 10:41 ` [v4 1/3] " wenxuanx.wu
2022-04-07 10:47 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-04-12 16:15 ` Ding, Xuan
2022-04-20 15:48 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-04-25 14:57 ` Ding, Xuan
2022-04-21 10:27 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-04-25 15:05 ` Ding, Xuan
2022-04-07 13:26 ` Jerin Jacob
2022-04-12 16:40 ` Ding, Xuan
2022-04-20 14:39 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-04-21 10:36 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-04-25 9:23 ` Ding, Xuan
2022-04-26 11:13 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] ethdev: introduce protocol based buffer split wenxuanx.wu
2022-04-26 11:13 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] lib/ethdev: introduce protocol type " wenxuanx.wu
2022-05-17 21:12 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-05-19 14:40 ` Ding, Xuan
2022-05-26 14:58 ` Ding, Xuan
2022-04-26 11:13 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] app/testpmd: add proto based buffer split config wenxuanx.wu
2022-04-26 11:13 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] net/ice: support proto based buf split in Rx path wenxuanx.wu
2022-04-02 10:41 ` [v4 2/3] app/testpmd: add header split configuration wenxuanx.wu
2022-04-02 10:41 ` [v4 3/3] net/ice: support header split in Rx data path wenxuanx.wu
2022-05-27 7:54 ` [PATCH v6] ethdev: introduce protocol header based buffer split xuan.ding
2022-05-27 8:14 ` [PATCH v6 0/1] ethdev: introduce protocol " xuan.ding
2022-05-27 8:14 ` [PATCH v6 1/1] ethdev: introduce protocol header " xuan.ding
2022-05-30 9:43 ` Ray Kinsella
2022-06-01 13:06 ` [PATCH v7 0/3] ethdev: introduce protocol type based header split wenxuanx.wu
2022-06-01 13:06 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] ethdev: introduce protocol header based buffer split wenxuanx.wu
2022-06-01 13:06 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] net/ice: support buffer split in Rx path wenxuanx.wu
2022-06-01 13:06 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] app/testpmd: add rxhdrs commands and parameters wenxuanx.wu
2022-06-01 13:22 ` [PATCH v7 0/3] ethdev: introduce protocol type based header split wenxuanx.wu
2022-06-01 13:22 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] ethdev: introduce protocol header based buffer split wenxuanx.wu
2022-06-01 13:22 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] net/ice: support buffer split in Rx path wenxuanx.wu
2022-06-01 13:22 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] app/testpmd: add rxhdrs commands and parameters wenxuanx.wu
2022-06-01 13:50 ` [PATCH v8 0/3] ethdev: introduce protocol type based header split wenxuanx.wu
2022-06-01 13:50 ` [PATCH v8 1/3] ethdev: introduce protocol hdr based buffer split wenxuanx.wu
2022-06-02 13:20 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-06-03 16:30 ` Ding, Xuan
2022-06-04 14:25 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-06-07 10:13 ` Ding, Xuan
2022-06-07 10:48 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-06-10 15:04 ` Ding, Xuan
2022-06-01 13:50 ` [PATCH v8 1/3] ethdev: introduce protocol header " wenxuanx.wu
2022-06-02 13:20 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-06-02 13:44 ` Ding, Xuan
2022-06-01 13:50 ` [PATCH v8 2/3] net/ice: support buffer split in Rx path wenxuanx.wu
2022-06-01 13:50 ` [PATCH v8 3/3] app/testpmd: add rxhdrs commands and parameters wenxuanx.wu
2022-06-02 13:20 ` [PATCH v8 0/3] ethdev: introduce protocol type based header split Andrew Rybchenko
2022-06-13 10:25 ` [PATCH v9 0/4] add an api to support proto based buffer split wenxuanx.wu
2022-06-13 10:25 ` [PATCH v9 1/4] ethdev: introduce protocol header API wenxuanx.wu
2022-07-07 9:05 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-08-01 7:09 ` Wang, YuanX
2022-08-01 10:01 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-08-02 10:12 ` Wang, YuanX
2022-07-08 15:00 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-08-01 7:17 ` Wang, YuanX
2022-06-13 10:25 ` [PATCH v9 2/4] ethdev: introduce protocol hdr based buffer split wenxuanx.wu
2022-07-07 9:07 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-07-11 9:54 ` Ding, Xuan
2022-07-11 10:12 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-07-08 15:00 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-07-21 3:24 ` Ding, Xuan
2022-08-01 14:28 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-08-02 7:22 ` Ding, Xuan
2022-06-13 10:25 ` [PATCH v9 3/4] app/testpmd: add rxhdrs commands and parameters wenxuanx.wu
2022-06-13 10:25 ` [PATCH v9 4/4] net/ice: support buffer split in Rx path wenxuanx.wu
2022-06-21 8:56 ` [PATCH v9 0/4] add an api to support proto based buffer split Ding, Xuan
2022-07-07 9:10 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-07-11 10:08 ` Ding, Xuan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BN9PR11MB5513A6CFEBEADD87AC638D5BE7179@BN9PR11MB5513.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=xuan.ding@intel.com \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=ping.yu@intel.com \
--cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
--cc=wenxuanx.wu@intel.com \
--cc=yuanx.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).