DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] devtools: add tracepoint check in checkpatch
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 06:03:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BY1PR18MB6109673745FF9FBA4BADA052DD7F2@BY1PR18MB6109.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241007174049.30e25d59@hermes.local>



>-----Original Message-----
>From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
>Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2024 6:11 AM
>To: Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com>
>Cc: dev@dpdk.org; thomas@monjalon.net; Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>
>Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] devtools: add tracepoint check in
>checkpatch
>
>On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 12: 09: 53 +0000 Ankur Dwivedi
><adwivedi@ marvell. com> wrote: > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Ankur
>Dwivedi <adwivedi@ marvell. com> > >Sent: Friday, December 15, 2023 12: 14
>PM > >To: 
>On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 12:09:53 +0000
>Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com> wrote:
>
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com>
>> >Sent: Friday, December 15, 2023 12:14 PM
>> >To: dev@dpdk.org
>> >Cc: thomas@monjalon.net; Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
>> ><jerinj@marvell.com>; Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com>
>> >Subject: [PATCH v6 0/2] devtools: add tracepoint check in checkpatch
>> >
>> >This patch series adds a validation in checkpatch tool to check if
>> >tracepoint is present in any new function added in ethdev, eventdev
>> >cryptodev and mempool library.
>>
>> Please let me know if this patch series can be merged in DPDK or if there are
>any comments.
>
>Not sure why the patch got ignored.
>Perhaps if check-tracepoint was run first against existing code; add to check-
>patch later.

check-tracepoint reads a patch and checks if a newly added function in a library has the trace in it or not. 
For existing code trace can be added manually. Trace was added for existing functions in 23.03 release.
>
>And the skip list is empty, is that right?
Yes. 
If trace is not required for a new library function, the function name can be added in skiplist.
The checkpatch will ignore trace check for that function.
> is all of existing cryptodev ethdev ... ok
>now?

No, it's not completely ok. Few functions does not have trace added.  Majority have trace added.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-09  6:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-12  9:23 [PATCH] " Ankur Dwivedi
2022-10-12 11:45 ` [PATCH v2] " Ankur Dwivedi
2022-10-12 13:08   ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-10-12 15:16     ` [EXT] " Ankur Dwivedi
2022-10-12 16:19       ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-10-15 12:58   ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Ankur Dwivedi
2022-10-15 12:58     ` [PATCH v3 1/2] devtools: move build symbol map function Ankur Dwivedi
2022-10-15 12:58     ` [PATCH v3 2/2] devtools: add tracepoint check in checkpatch Ankur Dwivedi
2022-11-02  4:08     ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-03-03 15:58     ` [PATCH v4 " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-03-03 15:58       ` [PATCH v4 1/2] devtools: move build symbol map function Ankur Dwivedi
2023-03-03 15:58       ` [PATCH v4 2/2] devtools: add tracepoint check in checkpatch Ankur Dwivedi
2023-03-07 12:05       ` [PATCH v5 0/1] " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-03-07 12:05         ` [PATCH v5 1/1] " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-05-18 13:45           ` Ankur Dwivedi
2023-05-18 15:33             ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-08-21 13:53               ` [EXT] " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-08-21 14:46                 ` Morten Brørup
2023-08-30 16:23                   ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-08-30 18:38                     ` Morten Brørup
2023-09-01  2:32                       ` Jerin Jacob
2023-09-01  7:28                         ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-11-14 13:15                           ` Ankur Dwivedi
2023-11-28 13:18         ` [PATCH v5 0/1] " Thomas Monjalon
2023-11-28 14:07           ` [EXT] " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-11-28 15:55             ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-11-30  5:56               ` Ankur Dwivedi
2023-11-30  8:40                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-11-30 13:16                   ` Ankur Dwivedi
2023-12-15  6:43         ` [PATCH v6 0/2] " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-12-15  6:43           ` [PATCH v6 1/2] devtools: move build map changes function Ankur Dwivedi
2023-12-15  6:43           ` [PATCH v6 2/2] devtools: add tracepoint check in checkpatch Ankur Dwivedi
2024-07-17 12:09           ` [PATCH v6 0/2] " Ankur Dwivedi
2024-10-08  0:40             ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-10-09  6:03               ` Ankur Dwivedi [this message]
2024-10-09 15:05                 ` [EXTERNAL] " Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BY1PR18MB6109673745FF9FBA4BADA052DD7F2@BY1PR18MB6109.namprd18.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=adwivedi@marvell.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).