From: "Dybkowski, AdamX" <adamx.dybkowski@intel.com>
To: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com" <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>,
"Doherty, Declan" <declan.doherty@intel.com>,
"asomalap@amd.com" <asomalap@amd.com>,
"anoobj@marvell.com" <anoobj@marvell.com>,
"Zhang, Roy Fan" <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>,
"Trahe, Fiona" <fiona.trahe@intel.com>,
"tdu@semihalf.com" <tdu@semihalf.com>,
"rnagadheeraj@marvell.com" <rnagadheeraj@marvell.com>,
"adwivedi@marvell.com" <adwivedi@marvell.com>,
"G.Singh@nxp.com" <G.Singh@nxp.com>,
"hemant.agrawal@nxp.com" <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
"jianjay.zhou@huawei.com" <jianjay.zhou@huawei.com>,
"De Lara Guarch, Pablo" <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/9] test/crypto: code cleanup
Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 14:11:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BY5PR11MB3910FA6F0133550B17D7432EEDA70@BY5PR11MB3910.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200504215811.15951-1-akhil.goyal@nxp.com>
Hi Akhil.
I checked these PMDs work properly after applying this patch series:
QAT, SW_ZUC, SW_SNOW3G, SCHEDULER, NULL
But there is a problem with OpenSSL PMD - it fails in one test now:
+ TestCase [15] : test_stats failed
As it is software-only PMD, you can verify this also on your side. Please do.
Adam Dybkowski
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Akhil Goyal
> Sent: Monday, 4 May, 2020 23:58
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com; Doherty, Declan <declan.doherty@intel.com>;
> asomalap@amd.com; anoobj@marvell.com; Zhang, Roy Fan
> <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>; Trahe, Fiona <fiona.trahe@intel.com>;
> tdu@semihalf.com; rnagadheeraj@marvell.com; adwivedi@marvell.com;
> G.Singh@nxp.com; hemant.agrawal@nxp.com; jianjay.zhou@huawei.com;
> De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>; Akhil Goyal
> <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/9] test/crypto: code cleanup
>
> Certain cases were put in PMD specific checks which should be avoided.
> Appropriate capability/supported feature flag should be checked before
> executing the test case.
> Added 1 missing feature flag for non-byte aligned data Enabled it for
> SNOW/ZUC/KASUMI PMDs.
> All the PMD owners are requested to verify these changes and let me know
> in case there are some issues.
>
> Also removed PMD specific testsuite for dpaa_sec and dpaa2_sec.
> It is requested to all PMD owners to remove their PMD specific suites and
> move to generic testsuite.
>
> Akhil Goyal (9):
> cryptodev: add feature flag for non-byte aligned data
> test/crypto: skip unsupported non-byte aligned cases
> test/crypto: skip unsupported SG cases
> test/crypto: skip unsupported sessionless cases
> test/crypto: skip unsupported session
> test/crypto: run PDCP cases if supported
> test/crypto: remove dpaaX_sec specific testsuites
> test/crypto: remove QAT specific check
> test/crypto: remove unused variable
>
> app/test/test_cryptodev.c | 845 +++++----------------
> doc/guides/cryptodevs/features/default.ini | 1 +
> doc/guides/cryptodevs/features/kasumi.ini | 1 +
> doc/guides/cryptodevs/features/snow3g.ini | 1 +
> doc/guides/cryptodevs/features/zuc.ini | 1 +
> drivers/crypto/kasumi/rte_kasumi_pmd.c | 1 +
> drivers/crypto/snow3g/rte_snow3g_pmd.c | 1 +
> drivers/crypto/zuc/rte_zuc_pmd.c | 1 +
> lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c | 2 +
> lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h | 2 +
> 10 files changed, 194 insertions(+), 662 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-05 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-04 21:58 Akhil Goyal
2020-05-04 21:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/9] cryptodev: add feature flag for non-byte aligned data Akhil Goyal
2020-05-05 9:57 ` Trahe, Fiona
2020-05-05 10:12 ` Akhil Goyal
2020-05-05 12:04 ` Trahe, Fiona
2020-05-04 21:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/9] test/crypto: skip unsupported non-byte aligned cases Akhil Goyal
2020-05-04 21:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/9] test/crypto: skip unsupported SG cases Akhil Goyal
2020-05-04 21:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/9] test/crypto: skip unsupported sessionless cases Akhil Goyal
2020-05-04 21:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/9] test/crypto: skip unsupported session Akhil Goyal
2020-05-04 21:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/9] test/crypto: run PDCP cases if supported Akhil Goyal
2020-05-04 21:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 7/9] test/crypto: remove dpaaX_sec specific testsuites Akhil Goyal
2020-05-04 21:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 8/9] test/crypto: remove QAT specific check Akhil Goyal
2020-05-04 21:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 9/9] test/crypto: remove unused variable Akhil Goyal
2020-05-05 14:11 ` Dybkowski, AdamX [this message]
2020-05-08 8:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/9] test/crypto: code cleanup Ruifeng Wang
2020-05-09 23:57 ` Akhil Goyal
2020-05-09 23:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " Akhil Goyal
2020-05-09 23:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/9] cryptodev: add feature flag for non-byte aligned data Akhil Goyal
2020-05-11 9:29 ` Dybkowski, AdamX
2020-05-11 10:10 ` Akhil Goyal
2020-05-11 9:54 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2020-05-11 10:05 ` Akhil Goyal
2020-05-11 14:40 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2020-05-09 23:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/9] test/crypto: skip unsupported non-byte aligned cases Akhil Goyal
2020-05-09 23:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/9] test/crypto: skip unsupported SG cases Akhil Goyal
2020-05-09 23:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/9] test/crypto: skip unsupported sessionless cases Akhil Goyal
2020-05-09 23:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/9] test/crypto: skip unsupported session Akhil Goyal
2020-05-09 23:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 6/9] test/crypto: run PDCP cases if supported Akhil Goyal
2020-05-09 23:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 7/9] test/crypto: remove dpaaX_sec specific testsuites Akhil Goyal
2020-05-09 23:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 8/9] test/crypto: remove QAT specific check Akhil Goyal
2020-05-09 23:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 9/9] test/crypto: remove unused variable Akhil Goyal
2020-05-11 8:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] [PATCH v2 0/9] test/crypto: code cleanup Anoob Joseph
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BY5PR11MB3910FA6F0133550B17D7432EEDA70@BY5PR11MB3910.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=adamx.dybkowski@intel.com \
--cc=G.Singh@nxp.com \
--cc=Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com \
--cc=adwivedi@marvell.com \
--cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
--cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
--cc=asomalap@amd.com \
--cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=fiona.trahe@intel.com \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=jianjay.zhou@huawei.com \
--cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
--cc=rnagadheeraj@marvell.com \
--cc=roy.fan.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=tdu@semihalf.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).