From: Tal Shnaiderman <talshn@nvidia.com>
To: Narcisa Ana Maria Vasile <navasile@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"pallavi.kadam@intel.com" <pallavi.kadam@intel.com>,
"dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com" <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>,
"ranjit.menon@intel.com" <ranjit.menon@intel.com>,
"harini.ramakrishnan@microsoft.com"
<harini.ramakrishnan@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] bus/pci: support segment value as address domain on Windows
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 07:30:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BY5PR12MB4323E9BFD579BD644F03B66CA4270@BY5PR12MB4323.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200909232121.GB13311@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] bus/pci: support segment value as address domain on
> Windows
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 02:43:16PM +0300, Tal Shnaiderman wrote:
> > Set the domain value for rte_pci_addr probing on Windows to the value
> > of the PCI segment returned by SPDRP_BUSNUMBER.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tal Shnaiderman <talshn@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/bus/pci/windows/pci.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/bus/pci/windows/pci.c
> > b/drivers/bus/pci/windows/pci.c index 489aa7902a..a40acec609 100644
> > --- a/drivers/bus/pci/windows/pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/bus/pci/windows/pci.c
> > @@ -195,8 +195,8 @@ get_device_pci_address(HDEVINFO dev_info,
> > return -1;
> > }
> >
> > - addr->domain = 0;
> > - addr->bus = bus_num;
> > + addr->domain = bus_num >> 8;
> > + addr->bus = bus_num & 0xff;
> > addr->devid = dev_and_func >> 16;
> > addr->function = dev_and_func & 0xffff;
> > return 0;
> > --
> Is this needed to avoid collision of devices with the same B:D:F?
Right, it can happen in virtualization setups when several virtual functions can have the same BDF, e.g.:
PS > Get-NetAdapterHardwareInfo
Name Segment Bus Device Function Slot NumaNode PcieLinkSpeed
---- ------- --- ------ -------- ---- -------- -------------
Ethernet 0 0 10 0 Unknown
Ethernet 4 58601 0 2 0 0 Unknown
Ethernet 5 52956 0 2 0 0 Unknown
DPDK currently can detect either Ethernet 4 or ethernet 5 if only BDF is checked.
Unix uses the Domain value, the equivalent value for Windows is Segment.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-10 7:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-25 11:43 Tal Shnaiderman
2020-09-09 23:21 ` Narcisa Ana Maria Vasile
2020-09-10 7:30 ` Tal Shnaiderman [this message]
2020-09-10 17:21 ` Menon, Ranjit
2020-09-13 14:50 ` Tal Shnaiderman
2020-09-10 17:57 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2020-09-13 14:54 ` Tal Shnaiderman
2020-09-16 18:32 ` Ranjit Menon
2020-10-14 9:01 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BY5PR12MB4323E9BFD579BD644F03B66CA4270@BY5PR12MB4323.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
--to=talshn@nvidia.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com \
--cc=harini.ramakrishnan@microsoft.com \
--cc=navasile@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=pallavi.kadam@intel.com \
--cc=ranjit.menon@intel.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).