DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jiang, YuX" <yux.jiang@intel.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: "dev (dev@dpdk.org)" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"Kovacevic, Marko" <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>,
	"Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>,
	"Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@xilinx.com>,
	Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>,
	mattias.ronnblom <mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com>
Subject: RE: release candidate 23.03-rc1
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2023 10:41:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BYAPR11MB2711D068691DC509836EC487FEB39@BYAPR11MB2711.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8x3G=n86UrqRQtXYqesSs9tkrYnNff5wQrxv4X0YW=dZA@mail.gmail.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> Sent: Friday, March 3, 2023 3:59 PM
> To: Jiang, YuX <yux.jiang@intel.com>; Thomas Monjalon
> <thomas@monjalon.net>
> Cc: dev (dev@dpdk.org) <dev@dpdk.org>; Kovacevic, Marko
> <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>; Mcnamara, John <john.mcnamara@intel.com>;
> Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson@intel.com>; Ferruh Yigit
> <ferruh.yigit@xilinx.com>; Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>;
> mattias.ronnblom <mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com>
> Subject: Re: release candidate 23.03-rc1
> 
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 12:16 PM David Marchand
> <david.marchand@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 9:26 AM David Marchand
> <david.marchand@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 8:38 AM Jiang, YuX <yux.jiang@intel.com> wrote:
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Jiang, YuX
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2023 4:39 PM
> > > > > To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>; dev (dev@dpdk.org)
> > > > > <dev@dpdk.org>
> > > > > Cc: Kovacevic, Marko <Marko.Kovacevic@intel.com>; Mcnamara, John
> > > > > <john.mcnamara@intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce
> > > > > <bruce.richardson@intel.com>; Ferruh Yigit
> > > > > <ferruh.yigit@xilinx.com>
> > > > > Subject: RE: release candidate 23.03-rc1
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2023 12:49 AM
> > > > > > To: announce@dpdk.org
> > > > > > Subject: release candidate 23.03-rc1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > A new DPDK release candidate is ready for testing:
> > > > > >     https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/tag/?id=v23.03-rc1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There are 566 new patches in this snapshot.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Release notes:
> > > > > >     https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/rel_notes/release_23_03.html
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Highlights of 23.03-rc1:
> > > > > >     - lock annotations
> > > > > >     - ARM power management monitor/wakeup
> > > > > >     - queue mapping of aggregated ports
> > > > > >     - flow quota
> > > > > >     - more flow matching (ICMPv6, IPv6 routing extension)
> > > > > >     - more flow actions (flex modify, congestion management)
> > > > > >     - SHAKE hash algorithm for crypto
> > > > > >     - LZ4 algorithm for compression
> > > > > >     - more telemetry endpoints
> > > > > >     - more tracepoints
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please test and report issues on bugs.dpdk.org.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > DPDK 23.03-rc2 is expected in two weeks.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thank you everyone
> > > > > >
> > > > > Update the test status for Intel part. Till now dpdk23.03-rc1
> > > > > test execution rate is 70%. No critical issue is found.
> > > > > # Basic Intel(R) NIC testing
> > > > > * Build or compile:
> > > > >  *Build: cover the build test combination with latest GCC/Clang
> > > > > version and the popular OS revision such as Ubuntu20.04.5,
> > > > > Ubuntu22.04.1, Fedora37,
> > > > > RHEL8.6/9.1 etc.
> > > > >   - All test passed.
> > > > >  *Compile: cover the CFLAGES(O0/O1/O2/O3) with popular OS such
> > > > > as
> > > > > Ubuntu22.04.1 and RHEL8.6.
> > > > >   - All test passed with latest dpdk.
> > > > > * Meson test & Asan test:
> > > > >     new issue:
> > > > >       - https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1162 [dpdk-
> > > > > 23.03][asan]ERROR: AddressSanitizer: global-buffer-overflow on
> > > > > address
> > > > > 0x000014eff508 at pc 0x00000173c234 bp 0x7fff7993bdd0 sp
> > > > > 0x7fff7993bdc8
> > > > >
> > > > >     known issue:
> > > > >       - https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1107
> > > > > [22.11-rc1][meson test] seqlock_autotest test failed
> > > > >       - https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1123
> > > > > [dpdk-22.11][asan] the stack-buffer-overflow was found when quit
> > > > > testpmd in Redhat9
> > > > > * PF/VF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including PF/VF-
> > > > > RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc.
> > > > >       - Execution rate is 90%.
> > > > >       - Find 1 new bug:
> > > > >           [dpdk-23.03] generic_flow_api/fdir_for_ipv6: packets
> > > > > of match rule cannot be allocated to the specified queue. -> Intel dev is
> under investigating.
> > > > > * PF/VF(ice): test scenarios including Switch features/Package
> > > > > Management/Flow Director/Advanced Tx/Advanced
> > > > > RSS/ACL/DCF/Flexible Descriptor, etc.
> > > > >       - Execution rate is 80%. No new issue is found.
> > > > > * Intel NIC single core/NIC performance: test scenarios
> > > > > including PF/VF single core performance test, RFC2544 Zero packet loss
> performance test, etc.
> > > > >       - Execution rate is 80%.
> > > > >       - Find 1 performance drop issue, bad commit is 4f8259df5 (net/iavf:
> > > > > enable Tx outer checksum offload on AVX512).
> > > > >       new fix patch link:
> > > > > https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20230222081311.744
> > > > > 88-1-
> > > > > zhichaox.zeng@intel.com/
> > > > > * Power and IPsec:
> > > > >  * Power: test scenarios including bi-direction/Telemetry/Empty
> > > > > Poll Lib/Priority Base Frequency, etc.
> > > > >       - Execution rate is 50%. No new issue is found.
> > > > >  * IPsec: test scenarios including ipsec/ipsec-gw/ipsec library
> > > > > basic test - QAT&SW/FIB library, etc.
> > > > >       - Execution rate is 50%. No new issue is found.
> > > > > # Basic cryptodev and virtio testing
> > > > > * Virtio: both function and performance test are covered. Such
> > > > > as PVP/Virtio_loopback/virtio-user loopback/virtio-net VM2VM
> > > > > perf testing/VMAWARE ESXI 8.0, etc.
> > > > >       - Execution rate is 80%. No new issue is found.
> > > > > * Cryptodev:
> > > > >  *Function test: test scenarios including Cryptodev API
> > > > > testing/CompressDev ISA-L/QAT/ZLIB PMD Testing/FIPS, etc.
> > > > >       - Execution rate is 50%. No new issue is found.
> > > > >  *Performance test: test scenarios including Throughput
> > > > > Performance /Cryptodev Latency, etc.
> > > > >       - Execution rate is 50%. No performance drop.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > Yu Jiang
> > > >
> > > > Update the test status for Intel part. Till now dpdk23.03-rc1 test is almost
> finished. No critical issue is found.
> > > > # Basic Intel(R) NIC testing
> > > > * Build or compile:
> > > >  *Build: cover the build test combination with latest GCC/Clang version
> and the popular OS revision such as Ubuntu20.04.5, Ubuntu22.04.1, Fedora37,
> RHEL8.6/9.1 etc.
> > > >   - All test passed.
> > > >  *Compile: cover the CFLAGES(O0/O1/O2/O3) with popular OS such as
> Ubuntu22.04.1 and RHEL8.6.
> > > >   - All test passed with latest dpdk.
> > > > * Meson test & Asan test:
> > > >     new issue:
> > > >         - https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1162 [dpdk23.03-
> rc1][asan]ERROR: AddressSanitizer: global-buffer-overflow on address
> 0x000014eff508 at pc 0x00000173c234 bp 0x7fff7993bdd0 sp 0x7fff7993bdc8
> > > >         - https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1166 [dpdk-
> 23.03][asan]vf_smoke/vf_tx_rx_queue: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow
> error when quit testpmd
> > > >                 - Still no response from dpdk community, hope it can be fixed
> asap, since it blocks our asan test.
> > >
> > > I marked it as a duplicate of https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1123.
> > >
> > > >         - https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1123
> > > > [dpdk-22.11][asan] the stack-buffer-overflow was found when quit
> > > > testpmd in Redhat9
> > >
> > > This ASan backtrace is strange.
> > >
> > > I can't replicate with clang built binaries.
> > > Please double check with clang and report back in the bz.
> > > I'll try to have a look once I hear back.
> >
> > This backtrace was ringing a bell... I finally realised it was
> > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=823 that I had opened last year.
> > The key point seems to be compiling with gcc *and* -O0 to get the ASan splat.
> >
> > Here is my reproducer:
> > $ rm -rf build-mini; CC='ccache gcc' meson setup build-mini
> > -Ddisable_libs=* -Denable_drivers=net/null -Denable_apps=test-pmd
> > -Dtests=false -Db_sanitize=address -Dbuildtype=debug && ninja -C
> > build-mini && ./devtools/test-null.sh build-mini
> >
> > For now, Intel QE might want to disable the sigaltstack mangling in
> > ASan, that will unblock further testing with ASan.
> > Like:
> > $ ASAN_OPTIONS=use_sigaltstack=0 ./devtools/test-null.sh build-mini
> 
> I put more details in the 823 bugzilla.
> 
> Afaiu, this is a bug in ASan itself.
> clang 15 is not affected.
> gcc 13 libasan also seems fixed.
> 
> I'll close this bugzilla as INVALID since this is an issue external to DPDK.
> A workaround is to disable sigaltstack by setting
> "ASAN_OPTIONS=use_sigaltstack=0" before running your tests.
> 
Thanks David.
Bz-1166 & bz-1123 disappear when set ASAN_OPTIONS=use_sigaltstack=0.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> --
> David Marchand


  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-03 10:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-20 16:48 Thomas Monjalon
2023-02-23  8:39 ` Jiang, YuX
2023-03-01  7:37   ` Jiang, YuX
2023-03-01  8:26     ` David Marchand
2023-03-01 11:16       ` David Marchand
2023-03-03  7:59         ` David Marchand
2023-03-03 10:41           ` Jiang, YuX [this message]
2023-03-08 22:09 ` Thinh Tran

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BYAPR11MB2711D068691DC509836EC487FEB39@BYAPR11MB2711.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=yux.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@xilinx.com \
    --cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
    --cc=ktraynor@redhat.com \
    --cc=marko.kovacevic@intel.com \
    --cc=mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).