DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dumitrescu, Cristian" <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
To: Suanming Mou <suanmingm@mellanox.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "amo@semihalf.com" <amo@semihalf.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] bitmap: add create bitmap with all bits set
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 14:16:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BYAPR11MB2935240226457827BDF30A1EEBC10@BYAPR11MB2935.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1586315145-6633-2-git-send-email-suanmingm@mellanox.com>

Hi Sunaming,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Suanming Mou <suanmingm@mellanox.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2020 4:06 AM
> To: Dumitrescu, Cristian <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; amo@semihalf.com
> Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] bitmap: add create bitmap with all bits set
> 
> Currently, in the case to use bitmap as resource allocator, after
> bitmap creation, all the bitmap bits should be set to indicate the
> bit available. Every time when allocate one bit, search for the set
> bits and clear it to make it in use.
> 
> Add a new rte_bitmap_init_with_all_set() function to have a quick
> fill up the bitmap bits.
> 
> Comparing with the case create the bitmap as empty and set the bitmap
> one by one, the new function costs less cycles.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suanming Mou <suanmingm@mellanox.com>
> ---
>  lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_bitmap.h | 113
> ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 85 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_bitmap.h
> b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_bitmap.h
> index 6b846f2..740076b 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_bitmap.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_bitmap.h
> @@ -136,6 +136,40 @@ struct rte_bitmap {
>  	bmp->go2 = 0;
>  }
> 
> +static inline struct rte_bitmap *
> +__rte_bitmap_init(uint32_t n_bits, uint8_t *mem, uint32_t mem_size)
> +{
> +	struct rte_bitmap *bmp;
> +	uint32_t array1_byte_offset, array1_slabs;
> +	uint32_t array2_byte_offset, array2_slabs;
> +	uint32_t size;
> +
> +	/* Check input arguments */
> +	if (n_bits == 0)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	if ((mem == NULL) || (((uintptr_t) mem) &
> RTE_CACHE_LINE_MASK))
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	size = __rte_bitmap_get_memory_footprint(n_bits,
> +		&array1_byte_offset, &array1_slabs,
> +		&array2_byte_offset, &array2_slabs);
> +	if (size < mem_size)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	/* Setup bitmap */
> +	bmp = (struct rte_bitmap *) mem;
> +
> +	bmp->array1 = (uint64_t *) &mem[array1_byte_offset];
> +	bmp->array1_size = array1_slabs;
> +	bmp->array2 = (uint64_t *) &mem[array2_byte_offset];
> +	bmp->array2_size = array2_slabs;
> +
> +	__rte_bitmap_scan_init(bmp);
> +
> +	return bmp;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * Bitmap memory footprint calculation
>   *
> @@ -170,36 +204,12 @@ struct rte_bitmap {
>  rte_bitmap_init(uint32_t n_bits, uint8_t *mem, uint32_t mem_size)
>  {
>  	struct rte_bitmap *bmp;
> -	uint32_t array1_byte_offset, array1_slabs, array2_byte_offset,
> array2_slabs;
> -	uint32_t size;
> 
> -	/* Check input arguments */
> -	if (n_bits == 0) {
> -		return NULL;
> -	}
> -
> -	if ((mem == NULL) || (((uintptr_t) mem) &
> RTE_CACHE_LINE_MASK)) {
> -		return NULL;
> -	}
> -
> -	size = __rte_bitmap_get_memory_footprint(n_bits,
> -		&array1_byte_offset, &array1_slabs,
> -		&array2_byte_offset, &array2_slabs);
> -	if (size < mem_size) {
> +	bmp = __rte_bitmap_init(n_bits, mem, mem_size);
> +	if (!bmp)
>  		return NULL;
> -	}
> -
> -	/* Setup bitmap */
> -	memset(mem, 0, size);
> -	bmp = (struct rte_bitmap *) mem;
> -
> -	bmp->array1 = (uint64_t *) &mem[array1_byte_offset];
> -	bmp->array1_size = array1_slabs;
> -	bmp->array2 = (uint64_t *) &mem[array2_byte_offset];
> -	bmp->array2_size = array2_slabs;
> -
> -	__rte_bitmap_scan_init(bmp);
> -
> +	memset(bmp->array1, 0, bmp->array1_size * sizeof(uint64_t));
> +	memset(bmp->array2, 0, bmp->array2_size * sizeof(uint64_t));
>  	return bmp;
>  }
> 

Can we please leave the function rte_bitmap_init() unmodified and put all changes in the new function rte_bitmap_init_with_all_set(). I realize this means duplicating a few lines of code between the two init functions, but IMO easier to maintain going forward.

> @@ -483,6 +493,53 @@ struct rte_bitmap {
>  	return 0;
>  }
> 
> +/**
> + * Bitmap initialization with all bits set
> + *
> + * @param n_bits
> + *   Number of pre-allocated bits in array2.
> + * @param mem
> + *   Base address of array1 and array2.
> + * @param mem_size
> + *   Minimum expected size of bitmap.
> + * @return
> + *   Handle to bitmap instance.
> + */
> +static inline struct rte_bitmap *
> +rte_bitmap_init_with_all_set(uint32_t n_bits, uint8_t *mem, uint32_t
> mem_size)
> +{
> +	uint32_t i;
> +	uint32_t slabs, array1_bits;
> +	struct rte_bitmap *bmp;
> +
> +	bmp = __rte_bitmap_init(n_bits, mem, mem_size);
> +	if (!bmp)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	array1_bits = bmp->array2_size >>
> RTE_BITMAP_CL_SLAB_SIZE_LOG2;
> +	/* Fill the arry1 slab aligned bits. */
> +	slabs = array1_bits >> RTE_BITMAP_SLAB_BIT_SIZE_LOG2;
> +	memset(bmp->array1, 0xff, slabs * sizeof(bmp->array1[0]));
> +	/* Clear the array1 left slabs. */
> +	memset(&bmp->array1[slabs], 0, (bmp->array1_size - slabs) *
> +	       sizeof(bmp->array1[0]));
> +	/* Fill the array1 middle not full set slab. */
> +	for (i = 0; i < (array1_bits & RTE_BITMAP_SLAB_BIT_MASK); i++)
> +		bmp->array1[slabs] |= 1llu << i;
> +
> +	/* Fill the arry2 slab aligned bits. */
> +	slabs = n_bits >> RTE_BITMAP_SLAB_BIT_SIZE_LOG2;
> +	memset(bmp->array2, 0xff, slabs * sizeof(bmp->array2[0]));
> +	/* Clear the array2 left slabs. */
> +	memset(&bmp->array2[slabs], 0, (bmp->array2_size - slabs) *
> +	       sizeof(bmp->array2[0]));
> +	/* Fill the array2 middle not full set slab. */
> +	for (i = 0; i < (n_bits & RTE_BITMAP_SLAB_BIT_MASK); i++)
> +		bmp->array2[slabs] |= 1llu << i;
> +
> +	return bmp;
> +}
> +
>  #ifdef __cplusplus
>  }
>  #endif
> --
> 1.8.3.1

This code is not that easy to read. This function is tricky to implement, as we basically need to correct some overhead bits in array1 and array2.

What I suggest for the layout of this function:
-call essentially the same code as rte_bitmap_init(), with the change that we set ALL the bits in array1 and array2 to 1 instead of 0
-call a new helper function to correct (set to 0) all the array2 bits  from position (index2, offset2) to the end
-call a new helper function to correct (set to 0) all the array1 bits from position (index1, offset1) to the end

What do you think?

Thanks,
Cristian

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-09 14:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-10  8:21 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] " Suanming Mou
2020-03-10  8:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] " Suanming Mou
2020-04-03 14:49   ` Andrzej Ostruszka
2020-04-07  6:19     ` Suanming Mou
2020-04-07 15:00       ` Suanming Mou
2020-04-07 17:48   ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2020-04-08  2:57     ` Suanming Mou
2020-03-10  8:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] test/bitmap: add bitmap create with all bits set case Suanming Mou
2020-03-25 13:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] bitmap: add create bitmap with all bits set Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-02 13:44   ` Suanming Mou
2020-04-08  3:05 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " Suanming Mou
2020-04-08  3:05   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] " Suanming Mou
2020-04-09 14:16     ` Dumitrescu, Cristian [this message]
2020-04-10 10:34       ` Suanming Mou
2020-04-10 11:21         ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2020-04-10 12:30           ` Suanming Mou
2020-04-08  3:05   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] test/bitmap: add bitmap create with all bits set case Suanming Mou
2020-04-10 12:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] bitmap: add create bitmap with all bits set Suanming Mou
2020-04-10 12:46   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] " Suanming Mou
2020-04-10 16:04     ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2020-04-10 12:46   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] test/bitmap: add bitmap create with all bits set case Suanming Mou
2020-04-15 14:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] bitmap: add init with all bits set Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-15 14:22   ` Suanming Mou
2020-04-15 14:42     ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BYAPR11MB2935240226457827BDF30A1EEBC10@BYAPR11MB2935.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \
    --cc=amo@semihalf.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=suanmingm@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).