From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>,
"Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
"Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
"Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>,
Lukasz Wojciechowski <l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] ip_frag: ensure minimum v6 fragmentation length
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 15:43:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BYAPR11MB3301E3DAF35071B4447A34769AD40@BYAPR11MB3301.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f7tpnc2rxfa.fsf@dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com>
> >> In addition, do a formal parameter check.
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Lukasz Wojciechowski <l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
> >> ---
> >> lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv6_fragmentation.c | 9 +++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv6_fragmentation.c b/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv6_fragmentation.c
> >> index 43449970e5..ee984aed82 100644
> >> --- a/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv6_fragmentation.c
> >> +++ b/lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv6_fragmentation.c
> >> @@ -79,6 +79,15 @@ rte_ipv6_fragment_packet(struct rte_mbuf *pkt_in,
> >> uint16_t fragment_offset, frag_size;
> >> uint64_t frag_bytes_remaining;
> >>
> >> + /*
> >> + * Formal parameter checking.
> >> + */
> >> + if (unlikely(pkt_in == NULL) || unlikely(pkts_out == NULL) ||
> >> + unlikely(nb_pkts_out == 0) ||
> >> + unlikely(pool_direct == NULL) || unlikely(pool_indirect == NULL) ||
> >> + unlikely(mtu_size < 1280))
> >
> > Same as for ipv4 - LGTM in general, but please avoid hard-coded constants for MTU values.
> > Here I couldn't find an existing macro ro min ipv6 mtu, so probably worth to add a new one
> > in librte_net/.
>
> I plan to add it in rte_ip.h as RTE_IPV6_MIN_MTU since it seems to fit
> there.
Sounds ok to me.
Thanks
Konstantin
I don't think it looks right to add RTE_ETHER_IPV6_MIN_MTU in
> the rte_ether.h file (but if you think it looks better I will change to
> that).
>
> > With that nit fixed:
> > Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
>
> Thanks!
>
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >> +
> >> /*
> >> * Ensure the IP payload length of all fragments (except the
> >> * the last fragment) are a multiple of 8 bytes per RFC2460.
> >> --
> >> 2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-20 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-31 16:07 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] ip_frag: add a unit test for fragmentation Aaron Conole
2020-03-31 16:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] ip_frag: ensure minimum v4 fragmentation length Aaron Conole
2020-03-31 16:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] ip_frag: ensure minimum v6 " Aaron Conole
2020-03-31 16:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] ip_frag: ipv6 fragments must not be resubmitted to fragmentation Aaron Conole
2020-03-31 16:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] ipfrag: add unit test case Aaron Conole
[not found] ` <20200331200715.13751-1-robot@bytheb.org>
2020-03-31 21:12 ` [dpdk-dev] |WARNING| pw67494 " Aaron Conole
2020-04-01 13:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] ip_frag: add a unit test for fragmentation Aaron Conole
2020-04-01 13:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] ip_frag: ensure minimum v4 fragmentation length Aaron Conole
2020-04-01 13:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] ip_frag: ensure minimum v6 " Aaron Conole
2020-04-01 13:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] ip_frag: ipv6 fragments must not be resubmitted to fragmentation Aaron Conole
2020-04-01 13:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] ipfrag: add unit test case Aaron Conole
2020-04-01 18:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] ip_frag: add a unit test for fragmentation Aaron Conole
2020-04-01 18:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] ip_frag: ensure minimum v4 fragmentation length Aaron Conole
2020-04-07 11:10 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-07 12:52 ` Aaron Conole
2020-04-07 14:14 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-07 18:41 ` Aaron Conole
2020-04-08 12:37 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-08 15:45 ` Aaron Conole
2020-04-01 18:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] ip_frag: ensure minimum v6 " Aaron Conole
2020-04-07 10:48 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-01 18:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] ip_frag: ipv6 fragments must not be resubmitted to fragmentation Aaron Conole
2020-04-07 10:43 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-07 12:40 ` Aaron Conole
2020-04-01 18:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] ipfrag: add unit test case Aaron Conole
2020-04-04 15:58 ` Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2020-04-15 17:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] ip_frag: add a unit test for fragmentation Aaron Conole
2020-04-15 17:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] ip_frag: ensure minimum v4 fragmentation length Aaron Conole
2020-04-17 11:52 ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-04-15 17:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] ip_frag: ensure minimum v6 " Aaron Conole
2020-04-17 11:52 ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-04-15 17:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] ipfrag: add unit test case Aaron Conole
2020-04-16 15:30 ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-04-16 18:52 ` Aaron Conole
2020-04-17 13:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/3] ip_frag: add a unit test for fragmentation Aaron Conole
2020-04-17 13:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] ip_frag: ensure minimum v4 fragmentation length Aaron Conole
2020-04-20 12:50 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-20 15:24 ` Aaron Conole
2020-04-17 13:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] ip_frag: ensure minimum v6 " Aaron Conole
2020-04-20 12:53 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-04-20 15:26 ` Aaron Conole
2020-04-20 15:43 ` Ananyev, Konstantin [this message]
2020-04-17 13:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] ipfrag: add unit test case Aaron Conole
2020-04-17 14:14 ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-04-20 16:03 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2020-04-20 17:34 ` Aaron Conole
2020-04-25 12:18 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-20 19:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/3] ip_frag: add a unit test for fragmentation Aaron Conole
2020-04-20 19:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/3] ip_frag: ensure minimum v4 fragmentation length Aaron Conole
2020-04-21 11:04 ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-04-20 19:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/3] ip_frag: ensure minimum v6 " Aaron Conole
2020-04-21 11:04 ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-04-20 19:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/3] ipfrag: add unit test case Aaron Conole
2020-04-21 11:03 ` Lukasz Wojciechowski
2020-04-25 13:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/3] ip_frag: add a unit test for fragmentation Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BYAPR11MB3301E3DAF35071B4447A34769AD40@BYAPR11MB3301.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com \
--cc=pbhagavatula@marvell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).