DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>
To: "Van Haaren, Harry" <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>,
	"Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran" <jerinj@marvell.com>,
	"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	"Wang, Yipeng1" <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>,
	"Gobriel, Sameh" <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>,
	"Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] hash: unify crc32 API header for x86 and ARM
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 09:27:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BYAPR18MB251812A9D2C3A4FAB465D032DEAA0@BYAPR18MB2518.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR11MB3143086F6AE7AB27EB48E130D7AA0@BYAPR11MB3143.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dev <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of
>pbhagavatula@marvell.com
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2020 7:05 PM
>> To: jerinj@marvell.com; thomas@monjalon.net; Wang, Yipeng1
>> <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>; Gobriel, Sameh
><sameh.gobriel@intel.com>;
>> Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson@intel.com>; Ruifeng Wang
>> <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>
>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] hash: unify crc32 API header for x86 and
>ARM
>>
>> From: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>
>>
>> Merge crc32 hash calculation public API headers for x86 and ARM,
>> split implementations of x86 and ARM into their respective private
>> headers.
>> This reduces the ifdef code clutter while keeping current ABI intact.
>>
>> Although we install `rte_crc_arm64.h` it is not used in any of the lib or
>> drivers layers. All the libs and drivers use `rte_hash_crc.h` which falls
>> back to SW crc32 calculation for ARM platform.
>
><snip lots of stuff, to focus on meson install header change>
>
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_hash/meson.build b/lib/librte_hash/meson.build
>> index 6ab46ae9d..90a180bc8 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_hash/meson.build
>> +++ b/lib/librte_hash/meson.build
>> @@ -1,8 +1,7 @@
>>  # SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
>>  # Copyright(c) 2017 Intel Corporation
>>
>> -headers = files('rte_crc_arm64.h',
>> -	'rte_fbk_hash.h',
>> +headers = files('rte_fbk_hash.h',
>>  	'rte_hash_crc.h',
>>  	'rte_hash.h',
>>  	'rte_jhash.h',
>
>Am I right in that previously an application could #include
><rte_crc_arm64.h>  and hence if we no
>longer install that file, this will cause a compilation failure on that
>application? Applications shouldn't
>include arch specific headers... but we shouldn't knowingly remove
>publicly accessible includes either.
>
>Perhaps consider just installing a dummy header file if the code cleanup
>in the rest of the patch is desired?

Sure we could either symlink `rte_hash_crc.h` as `rte_crc_arm64.h` or
Just include rte_hash_crc.h in rte_crc_arm64.h for now and remove
rte_crc_arm64.h later with a deprecation notice? 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-30  9:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-29 18:05 pbhagavatula
2020-04-30  9:14 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2020-04-30  9:27   ` Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula [this message]
2020-05-06 22:02 ` Wang, Yipeng1
2020-05-10 22:49   ` Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2020-05-08 12:55 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-05-10 22:53   ` Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2020-05-11  9:46     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-05-11 10:23       ` Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2020-05-11 10:27         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-05-11 10:57           ` Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2020-05-11 12:10             ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-05-11 12:32               ` Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2020-05-12 20:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC v2] " pbhagavatula
2020-05-13  3:04   ` Ruifeng Wang
2020-05-13 13:22     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-10-03 23:00   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] hash: split x86 and SW hash CRC intrinsics pbhagavatula
2021-10-03 23:00     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] hash: unify crc32 selection for x86 and Arm pbhagavatula
2021-10-04  5:52     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] hash: split x86 and SW hash CRC intrinsics pbhagavatula
2021-10-04  5:52       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] hash: unify crc32 selection for x86 and Arm pbhagavatula
2021-10-18  9:21         ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-11-05 10:10       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] hash: split x86 and SW hash CRC intrinsics pbhagavatula
2021-11-05 10:10         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] hash: unify crc32 selection for x86 and Arm pbhagavatula
2022-01-04  9:12           ` Ruifeng Wang
2022-04-08  9:16             ` David Marchand
2021-11-16 14:57         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] hash: split x86 and SW hash CRC intrinsics David Marchand
2022-04-27 13:35         ` [PATCH v6 " Pavan Nikhilesh
2022-04-27 13:35           ` [PATCH v6 2/2] hash: unify crc32 selection for x86 and Arm Pavan Nikhilesh
2022-04-27 15:22           ` [PATCH v7 1/2] hash: split x86 and SW hash CRC intrinsics Pavan Nikhilesh
2022-04-27 15:22             ` [PATCH v7 2/2] hash: unify crc32 selection for x86 and Arm Pavan Nikhilesh
2022-04-29  7:19               ` Ruifeng Wang
2022-04-29  7:18             ` [PATCH v7 1/2] hash: split x86 and SW hash CRC intrinsics Ruifeng Wang
2022-04-29 13:29             ` David Marchand
2022-04-29 15:56               ` [EXT] " Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2022-04-29 16:16             ` [PATCH v8 " Pavan Nikhilesh
2022-04-29 16:17               ` [PATCH v8 2/2] hash: unify crc32 selection for x86 and Arm Pavan Nikhilesh
2022-05-03 14:33                 ` David Marchand
2022-05-04  2:53                 ` Wang, Yipeng1
2022-05-11 14:23                   ` David Marchand
2022-05-04  2:19               ` [PATCH v8 1/2] hash: split x86 and SW hash CRC intrinsics Wang, Yipeng1
2022-05-13 18:27               ` [PATCH v9 " pbhagavatula
2022-05-13 18:27                 ` [PATCH v9 2/2] hash: unify crc32 selection for x86 and Arm pbhagavatula
2022-05-19 14:20                   ` David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BYAPR18MB251812A9D2C3A4FAB465D032DEAA0@BYAPR18MB2518.namprd18.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=pbhagavatula@marvell.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
    --cc=sameh.gobriel@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=yipeng1.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).