From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0621E2BAB for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 07:18:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 Mar 2016 22:18:20 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,535,1449561600"; d="scan'208";a="663632739" Received: from fmsmsx105.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.203]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 Mar 2016 22:18:19 -0800 Received: from fmsmsx118.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.18) by FMSMSX105.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 22:18:19 -0800 Received: from shsmsx103.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.69) by fmsmsx118.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 22:18:19 -0800 Received: from shsmsx101.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.136]) by SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.4.24]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 14:18:17 +0800 From: "Xie, Huawei" To: Thomas Monjalon , Stephen Hemminger Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] virtio: Tx performance improvements Thread-Index: AdFHkIEcLZU+WrxzTSqdZam/b6/SDg== Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 06:18:17 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1445231772-17467-1-git-send-email-stephen@networkplumber.org> <2330408.2AHZ8BdDek@xps13> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] virtio: Tx performance improvements X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 06:18:21 -0000 On 1/14/2016 9:49 PM, Xie, Huawei wrote:=0A= > On 1/6/2016 8:04 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:=0A= >> 2016-01-05 08:10, Xie, Huawei:=0A= >>> On 10/26/2015 10:06 PM, Xie, Huawei wrote:=0A= >>>> On 10/19/2015 1:16 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:=0A= >>>>> This is a tested version of the virtio Tx performance improvements=0A= >>>>> that I posted earlier on the list, and described at the DPDK Userspac= e=0A= >>>>> meeting in Dublin. Together they get a 25% performance improvement fo= r=0A= >>>>> both small packet and large multi-segment packet case when testing=0A= >>>>> from DPDK guest application to Linux KVM host.=0A= >>>>>=0A= >>>>> Stephen Hemminger (5):=0A= >>>>> virtio: clean up space checks on xmit=0A= >>>>> virtio: don't use unlikely for normal tx stuff=0A= >>>>> virtio: use indirect ring elements=0A= >>>>> virtio: use any layout on transmit=0A= >>>>> virtio: optimize transmit enqueue=0A= >>>> There is one open why merge-able header is used in tx path. Since old= =0A= >>>> implementation is also using the merge-able header in tx path if this= =0A= >>>> feature is negotiated, i choose to ack the patch and address this late= r=0A= >>>> if not now.=0A= >>>>=0A= >>>> Acked-by: Huawei Xie =0A= >>> Thomas:=0A= >>> This patch isn't in the patchwork. Does Stephen need to send a new one?= =0A= >> Yes please, I cannot find them in patchwork.=0A= > ping=0A= =0A= Ping.=0A= =0A= =0A= >=0A= =0A=