From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <huawei.xie@intel.com>
Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BE322C65
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue,  8 Mar 2016 02:39:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29])
 by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Mar 2016 17:39:11 -0800
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,554,1449561600"; d="scan'208";a="665521949"
Received: from fmsmsx106.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.204])
 by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Mar 2016 17:39:11 -0800
Received: from fmsmsx117.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.17) by
 FMSMSX106.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
 id 14.3.248.2; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 17:39:11 -0800
Received: from shsmsx152.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.6.52) by
 fmsmsx117.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
 id 14.3.248.2; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 17:39:11 -0800
Received: from shsmsx101.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.136]) by
 SHSMSX152.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.6.42]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002;
 Tue, 8 Mar 2016 09:38:40 +0800
From: "Xie, Huawei" <huawei.xie@intel.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] virtio: Tx performance improvements
Thread-Index: AdFHkIEcLZU+WrxzTSqdZam/b6/SDg==
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 01:38:39 +0000
Message-ID: <C37D651A908B024F974696C65296B57B4C63DD0A@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
References: <1445231772-17467-1-git-send-email-stephen@networkplumber.org>
 <C37D651A908B024F974696C65296B57B4B143019@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <C37D651A908B024F974696C65296B57B4C574EFA@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <2330408.2AHZ8BdDek@xps13>
 <C37D651A908B024F974696C65296B57B4C590196@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <C37D651A908B024F974696C65296B57B4C629CA5@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <20160304101732.144d8901@xeon-e3>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] virtio: Tx performance improvements
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 01:39:13 -0000

On 3/5/2016 2:17 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:=0A=
> Resending them now. I don't understand the issue with merge-able header.=
=0A=
> Virtio negotiation is symmetric, if receiver is using merge-able header=
=0A=
> then the transmitter needs to send it also.=0A=
=0A=
Yes, both receiver and transmitter use the same format of header though=0A=
merge-able is actually only meaningful in RX path.=0A=