From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 700A6AF85 for ; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 10:36:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Apr 2014 01:36:14 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,862,1389772800"; d="scan'208";a="493177903" Received: from irsmsx102.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.155]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Apr 2014 01:35:36 -0700 Received: from irsmsx152.ger.corp.intel.com (163.33.192.66) by IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com (163.33.3.155) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 09:33:59 +0100 Received: from irsmsx104.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.2]) by IRSMSX152.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.6.180]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 09:33:59 +0100 From: "Burakov, Anatoly" To: Thomas Monjalon Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] remove RTE_EAL_UNBIND_PORTS related code Thread-Index: AQHPV+BhM3vrbSriC0ydfuq/aandUZsREsuwgAAFyQCAABFfkIABG1yAgAAVAWA= Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 08:33:59 +0000 Message-ID: References: <534BEE72.4070205@6wind.com> <4976678.CMXOgFkiV5@xps13> In-Reply-To: <4976678.CMXOgFkiV5@xps13> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.181] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] remove RTE_EAL_UNBIND_PORTS related code X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 08:36:14 -0000 Hi Thomas, David, Thanks for your detailed explanations and insights, I now have a better pic= ture. I still have to do a lot of catch up on dpdk.org tree and ecosystem, = so please forgive my ignorance about some dpdk.org-related subjects at time= s :-) > Do you agree that the David's version is a good step in the right directi= on as it > allows to remove RTE_EAL_UNBIND_PORTS? > If so, could you ack these patches, please? > Then we could discuss what are the next steps. Yes. I'll ack and rebase my patch once David's patch makes it into the tree= then. Best regards, Anatoly Burakov DPDK SW Engineer -------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Shannon Limited Registered in Ireland Registered Office: Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare Registered Number: 308263 Business address: Dromore House, East Park, Shannon, Co. Clare