From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0745559A
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 11:42:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27])
 by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Jul 2016 02:42:15 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,433,1464678000"; d="scan'208";a="855078556"
Received: from irsmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.3])
 by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Jul 2016 02:42:15 -0700
Received: from irsmsx109.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.13.24]) by
 IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.11.71]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002;
 Thu, 28 Jul 2016 10:42:13 +0100
From: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>, Alex Williamson
 <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
CC: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [bug] dpdk-vfio: Invalid region/index assumption
Thread-Index: AQHR6FRXcfTy345rD0CiNe6mtg9Il6AtWGkAgAA/RiA=
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 09:42:13 +0000
Message-ID: <C6ECDF3AB251BE4894318F4E451236978214572C@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com>
References: <20160727161457.7992c756@t450s.home> <2860054.FZ01Xh8IR9@xps13>
In-Reply-To: <2860054.FZ01Xh8IR9@xps13>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-ctpclassification: CTP_IC
x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiZDRmNWIwZmItYzVlMC00OGUzLWE3NjYtNTI1ZDA0YjA4ZGI2IiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX0lDIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE1LjkuNi42IiwiVHJ1c3RlZExhYmVsSGFzaCI6Ijg3NldIOHVBUEpwN2RENVI3WVBjVFlYaU0waDQ3UzJkdWdMTVVEOXBRejQ9In0=
x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.182]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [bug] dpdk-vfio: Invalid region/index assumption
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 09:42:17 -0000

> Hi,
>=20
> 2016-07-27 16:14, Alex Williamson:
> > I took a quick look at the dpdk vfio code and spotted an invalid
> > assumption that should probably be corrected ASAP.
>=20
> It can theoretically be a bug but the value may never change in the kerne=
l,
> right?
> So when you say ASAP, I feel it can wait the next DPDK release (we plan t=
o
> release today).
> Do you agree?

Unless there are imminent plans to change this in the kernel, I think it ca=
n wait for next release.

Thanks,
Anatoly